Utopia Talk / Politics / The jewish Question (Thread #1 of 110)

Cherub Cow rank	Mon Jan 19 20:45:58 The jew is the enemy of mankind and seeks to enslave the world. Let us examine the nature of the jew so that we might answer the question of millennia.
Cherub Cow rank	Mon Jan 19 20:46:09 "Inside the New York Town Invaded by Welfare-Addicted Jews..." [Tyler Oliveira; January 15th, 2026] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nd17ZGaoZ58
Cherub Cow rank	Mon Jan 19 21:08:36 "Attorney General Pam Bondi, after being introduced by Miriam Adelson, tells the Israeli-American Council how the DOJ is working for them by suing anti-Israel protesters under the FACE Act for "the first time," and extracting giant "anti-Semitism" settlements out of universities." http://x.com/infolibnews/status/2013033776675230034 The jew tells the lie of "anti-Semitism" and "hate speech" so that their slaves will consider them sacred and inviolable. jewish slaves will use the FACE act to protect the jew, but will we see prosecutions against the jewish bioweapons who stormed a Church yesterday? Perhaps. Even then, we must ask why it is that the jew is protected while White people are systematically murdered by jewish golems.
murder rank	Mon Jan 19 21:13:57 So what do you propose for a final solution? -
Pillz rank	Mon Jan 19 21:18:44 Elect AfD in Germany and give them a few decades. Germans could finally do something good for humanity using their innate irresistible urge to destroy. Dunno why we stopped them early last time. Once the Germans are done we exterminate the Germans. With neither Jews nor Germans, humanity can enter into a prosperous new era and beat back the eastern hordes.
Cherub Cow rank	Mon Jan 19 22:06:30 [murfag]: "So what do you propose for a final solution?" Indeed we will also discuss how jewish programming has made mindless people such as yourself immediately believe that any talk of the jew must necessarily accelerate to thought-terminating clichés. Notable, of course, is that totalitarian thought reform's use of thought-terminating clichés began with the jew. Their one god is Memnoch the Devil, and it is his nature to devour the world; this is a totalizing mantra which birthed totalitarianism itself. And why would the jew's thought reform matter for we Free Westerners? We in the West believe in the separation of state and synagogue, do we not? The values of the jew should not dictate our own futures. [pillz]: "Once the Germans are done we exterminate the Germans." Why would you subjugate Noble Germany thusly? With leftists disenfranchised in Germany, perhaps they could recover the losses inflicted upon them by the international jewish Bolsheviks. It was, after all, Germanic tribes who cleansed Rome when the jew destroyed Rome with "multiculturalism". If the jew survives your scenario, who could renew the world again? Perhaps many others fighters could emerge as we know that fighters today exist outside of Germany, but certainly it makes no sense to deprive ourselves of those who resist the jew's totalitarian designs. Ultra-Violence is our Great Gift to the world, which ever looms should the world need to be cleansed of enslavers. .... "Daniel Schueftan, Israeli security expert - Jung & Naiv: Episode 377" [September 2018] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNTM_xmFdZE (Daniel Schueftan is a jewish advisor to the "Israeli" security council. He spends his time game-boarding jewish global imperatives.) Here we see a repeat of a common jewish theme (particularly after 1:45:00): the jew, when not concerned with performing ideological consistency for his slaves, will outright tell you what he thinks of the formation of collectives. (We see the same theme in the jewish work "Dialectic of Enlightenment" (1947), wherein the jew strategized how to defeat the remaining West following Germany's defeat at the hands of the international Bolshevik jews). The jew denies all collectivism for the enemies that he seeks to destroy, hence, the jew encourages "Global South" collectives, and White collectives are discouraged today in the same way that German collectives were discouraged before WWI. Germany was considered by the jew to be too defiant of jewish international Bolshevism — they were at that time the most unwilling to be enslaved, thus the jew eroded their nation with "multiculturalism", and, when Sacred Germany's living imperative reasserted itself, the jew used their infiltration of world governance to turn the world against Germany. The jew thus evaluates enemies as Schueftan illustrates concisely within about ten minutes: if the result of a particular people coming together as a collective is that this people opposes jewish messianic totalitarianism, then the jew considers them an evil that must be destroyed. The criteria of this are very simple: • Do these people accept enslavement to the jew or not? • Will these people destroy the jew's greater enemies or not? If a people does not accept jewish enslavement, then at some point the jew intends to destroy them. But, if the jew has greater enemies, then these people will be manipulated into killing the jew's greater enemies. When this people invariably displaces the jew's greater enemies to become one of the jew's top rivals, then they too will be destroyed by the next greater of the jew's enemies. This is the jewish cycle of annihilation which occurs whenever jews gain power (i.e., this is the jew's own collectivized nature: global genocide, global enslavement). Some call this the "Fourth Turning" in a pretense that it is a natural development of any society, whereas this is a development only of societies infiltrated by the jew; the "Turning" does not occur in the absence of the jew. In the video, Schueftan only specifically identifies the Irish and the Swedish as particular *Western* enemies when it comes to this criteria of defiance when collectivized (around 1:57:00), but this is a limitation of their discussion going in other directions rather than being a complete list. (Note that of the non-Western enemies he, of course, lists Middle Eastern enemies not favorable to the jew: Iran, Syria, and the other nations that these United States have attacked on behalf of the jew.) What is interesting is thus that he spoke of this in 2018, and we see how the jewish plan of "sustainability" has captured those nations since this time, with Sweden ranking 4th in the world as having governance infiltration favorable to the jew and Ireland ranking at 9th per worldeconomics (an accredited ESG ranking agency). Most of the Nordic nations were targeted for "sustainability" likely because *if* collectivized they could resist the jew, but sustainability has eroded their ability to do so. These nations (the nations top-in-the-world for jewish "sustainability") are now all run by jewish slaves, with the general populace being propagandized to oppose the rise of any Right-wing faction that could save them. The capture of these nations by jews has, of course, resulted in mass-migration from the "Global South" to liquidate Western collectivization. We see the same strategy playing out in all Western nations under the management of the jew, with Minneapolis being a pertinent city-level example in the news of late. Minneapolis, is, of course, managed by the jewish Bolshevik Jacob Frey, who is leading a coalition of "Global South" slaves in a slave revolt in morality against White Americans. Much of the jew's displeasure with ICE comes from this desire to end White collectivization in these United States by forcing the lie of "multiculturalism", since, as their slogan goes, "Diversity is [the jew's] strength". In short, the theme of collectivization is one that shows which direction jewish schemes of world genocide are going. The lesson that jewish agitprop of the 20th century enforced upon the minds of their boomer slaves was that "never again" meant that no White people could every collectivize again because "[muh holly, muh shoah]". The absurdity of this cannot be overstated. In the Frankfurt School of the 1940s, jews had already decided that the entire White West was their next project for genocide and liquidation, and they were already speaking about it purely from a logistical standpoint (i.e., in terms of infiltration and the time required for subversion). While German women and children were still being raped by their slave armies from the East, they were planning how to make slave armies that would destroy these United States and England. They did not care that White Westerners from these United States or England had "saved" the jews from a "shoah" because the jew sees no distinction between a White German and a White American; all are to them their "Edom" (enemy that must be destroyed). The concept of giving "thanks" to those who "saved" them is not a part of their dogma because they believe that it is the nature of their slaves to serve them as masters.
Pillz rank	Mon Jan 19 22:16:22 2/10 ragebait A valiant effort, though. But Germans are a blight on this earth. They did not save Rome. They ruined it. And they ruined Christianity. And they ruined philosophy. And they ruined the social contract. If you think Germans saved Rome from Jews, you really have fallen too far. But why don't you offer a single other example of Germans contributing something of note to civilization, besides gnawing away at it every opportunity they get
Pillz rank	Mon Jan 19 22:26:43 Germans never had the benefit of cultural enrichment that other barbarians had. They've no foundation beneath them but that which they destroyed Rome with. Godless, moralless animals in the bodies of humans, who seek just to destroy whatever structure stand before them, out of a fear of loss of their so-called individuality. Never before in human history has a people so clearly lacked an internal compass as the Germans. Nothing is natural to them except the need to ruin what they find or are given. Every other people in Europe can be characterized by their culture, traditions, the spirit of their pasts. Germans just have autism and a need to poison and dismantle.
Cherub Cow rank	Mon Jan 19 22:40:14 [pillz (probable faggot)]: "But Germans are a blight on this earth." Very faggoty and not worth obliterating such an unsubstantiated opinion in more than a paragraph or two: the world has long known that the German is an excellent pairing of mind and heart, hence for centuries it is Germans who were contracted when any project of liberty needed to be begun in the West. The American project itself courted Germans to its shores since as a simple fact of historical reality they were the most likely to champion the earning of liberty through their Good Works and the most likely to fight for these ends. In the early history of these United States, England and these United States both sought to attract Germans to their causes for this recognition of their Great Gift of Ultra-Violence and their Great Nature towards liberty. Even today these United States possess a heavy contribution within its White ancestry via Germans. So your faggoty attempt to distort this flies in the face of history and is best left for whatever degenerate acts one must assume that you were falling into while you were supposed to be obliterating the falsehoods of millennia. Even your faggoty comment about Rome is some low-IQ agnosia which fails to reconcile the stages of Rome and the facts of its multicultural fall. If removed from your pathetic fall into ego, could you even realize that were these United States to become a brown horde of Somalians and Mexicans, that Germans annihilating these brown peoples would indeed be a renewal? Would that truth hurt your ego as well? "Saved Rome from Jews"! Laughable misrepresentation akin to the faggotry of sebgul. This thread will march on despite the musings of the ignorant. ........ "Sam Harris: Right-wing conspiracy theorists—including Elon Musk—think Jews pushed open borders/mass immigration. Judea Pearl: "We were the arrowhead pressing for open borders ... that's true."" http://x.com/infolibnews/status/2012321889046196601 We see here an example of how the jew manages himself with the Celebration Parallax ("That's not happening and it's good that it is!"). The jewish Sam Harris holds the early position in the Parallax, claiming that it is merely "conspiracy theory" that jews pushed for mass-immigration to the West ("It's not happening"), while a more honest jew tells Harris that, actually, yes, "that's true"; the jew was indeed behind the push for mass-immigration to the West ("it's good that it is [happening]!"). This strategy of forcing multiculturalism upon the West is the jew's fantasy of messianic totalitarianism. There are several levels to this messianic totalitarianism from a genetic standpoint, since the jew wears phenotypes as masks from generation to generation (a shapeshifting theme which has emerged in many stories which have told of the nature of the jew for centuries), but the jew intends to rule a kind of Tower of Babel where the world squabbles and can get nothing done within their own factions while the jew rules as the enslaver of a mindless rabble. This is, again, their Anti-Christ goal for the world. Thus, from one standpoint, the jew uses multiculturalism to create what the jew Kalergi called "the race of the future" (a brown bio-mass with no history, no memory, no distinct people; fictionally described as Nietzsche's "Last Man" (first appeared in Nietzsche around 1883) and described shortly afterwards by H. G. Wells as "Eloi" in "The Time Machine" (1895)). A people with no history can be enslaved by the jew if the jew is able to retain his own history. Thus, the jew endlessly deconstructs the histories of all of the world's tribes while claiming that he invented all religion, whereas, in truth, the jew is a plagiarist of mankind. The jew is only a vehicle towards parasitism and power, hence he will tell any lie of his history if it grants him a narrative to enslave the world. This is also what Orwell described in "1984". Notable, of course, is that 1984 was not about Germany but about jewish Bolshevism. All of the processes that Orwell described of this totalitarian government were sampled from jewish imperatives. Winston's job as a destroyer and falsifier of history is how the jew destroys the histories of those it seeks to enslave (which is everyone). We see today that the jew deconstructs the history of the White West the same as he deconstructs the history of Palestine: he does this not from truth but to destroy by falsifying a narrative which justifies annihilation. We must take a moment then to realize that the West's narratives are antithetical to this devil-worshipper narrative. A common theme of the West is to make all peoples of the world un-enslaveable and to hold their histories (as their futures) in their own hands. The jew opposes this. The West breeds defiance. The jew breeds subservience. The tragedy is that in Celebration Parallax the jew openly tells us all of this, but many people, bred or propagandized to be slaves, have simply chosen to accept it.
Pillz rank	Mon Jan 19 22:44:59 Its amusing you think I read your entire post. But my points stand, and you are now exposed as a Germanic whore, fueled not by some epistemological or deontological necessity, but by the urge to break things (and murder Jews)
Cherub Cow rank	Mon Jan 19 23:20:16 [pillz]: "But my points stand, and you are now exposed as a Germanic whore, fueled not by some epistemological or deontological necessity, but by the urge to break things (and murder Jews)" Flagrant and pathetic lies. Your enslavers have programmed you with clichés. [pillz]: "Its amusing you think I read your entire post." Oh, I know that you don't, and I have given no indication here or anywhere that I think otherwise. I have pointed out many times that the slavish will fail to read when they see that their worldview is falling apart. With the most slavish of slaves such as murderfag, tumbletard, sebgul, and williamthebitchfag, this means that they hardly read anything at all. With the less slavish, they will read unless it prosecutes their enslavers, hence Rugian and Sam are suddenly mute on the issue of the jew. You, being a slave on this same hierarchy of self-imposed enslavement, have met your own pet stupidities wherein you off-load your intellect with willful ignorance. I do not write any of this for the pathetic; this is Lightning for those who at least must know that there is an elephant in the room and that they are indeed pathetic for ignoring it, as you are indeed pathetic. This is your conscience tapping you on the shoulder and reminding you that you are a slave and that your ignorance cannot save you from the obliteration that you yourself invite. .......... "Batya Ungar-Sargon: "Only 13% [of Democrats] stand with Israelis against the Palestinians…" "The thing that makes this so appalling is that Jews built the left in this country. We built the labor movement. We wrote the New Deal. 70% of the lawyers who worked on civil rights cases were Jews!" "We've been at the forefront of every liberal and leftist issue in this country!"" [October 28th, 2025] http://x.com/infolibnews/status/1983156803652276506 Here we see another Celebration Parallax moment. For years people have warned the slavish that it is the jew directing this latest (post-2016) slave revolt in morality — as the jew has directed many in the past. This too was dismissed in the "That's not happening" phase of the Parallax. Yet, here we see the jewish Batya Ungar-Sargon proudly proclaiming that this is indeed the case: that jews are at the forefront of slave revolts in the West. And what further evidence must we publish of this fact? An easy place to start would be with the jewish Bolshevik's scheme of "sustainability", which I detailed already in the totalitarians threads but will re-state for the topic: "Sustainability" itself was hatched by the jewish Bolshevik Herbert Marcuse, pushed in the jewish-captured United Nations, formalized in 2004 by jewish asset managers, and pushed in 2008 by the jewish banking scheme wherein jewish bankers (e.g., the jewish-run Lehman Brothers, the jewish-run Bear Stearns) made millions off the collapse of global economies and then "punished" themselves by awarding themselves millions in retirement bonuses and by giving themselves exclusive control of further global economics via, for instance, "Dodd–Frank". Naturally, 2008's Dodd–Frank itself was drafted largely by the jewish Barney Frank, this being similar to the Hart–Celler Act being drafted by the jewish Emanuel Celler (this act opening these United States to foreigners under a "multiculturalism" scheme; one of the single greatest treasons in the history of this nation). Hence, jews caused the problem and then "solved it" by giving themselves more power. And who profited most greatly from Dodd–Frank? Well, the jewish Larry Fink, of course! The jewish Larry Fink's BlackRock just happened to be best positioned to handle the fallout from the collapse of jewish banks, and his scheme just happened to expand control for further jewish asset management. Most unabashedly, Larry Fink's office was called "Little Israel" because it was so thoroughly dominated by jewish bankers. What a proper coincidence! It surely must be because they were denied access to the guilds! Following BlackRock's empowerment under post-2008 "reforms", asset managers had a blank check with which to propagandize the world. All studios no longer had to care about merely slipping-in their agitprop; all of their losses were protected such that jewish morality could be their primary thematic element with no attempt at even entertaining the narratives of Western morality, which was freely deconstructed by resentful nihilists, further provoking a slave revolt. Some (e.g., Tim Pool) have suggested that Occupy Wall Street was derailed via the manufacturing of a slave revolt (the manufacturing of "woke"), but this is not the true chronology. It is true that Occupy Wall Street brought the full attention of left and right populists to the issue of the asset managers, but "woke" had already been manufactured well in advance of these protests. The 2008 collapse merely gave the asset managers more power to fund what they had already been seeding in the universities (e.g., paid protestors, dysgenic leftists given narrative weapons). At any rate, the jewish "sustainability" scheme quickly became an obvious anti-competitive pyramid scheme and protection racket, with any adopters of the scheme "rewarded" with investments *if* their projects supported jewish totalitarianism, and any non-adopters punished through protection racket behaviors such as the liquidation of their boards, forced non-involvement of all adopters, and heavy regulations from jewish-owned regulators. And why did this issue of overt illegality not achieve the attention of the SEC? Why, because the SEC was run by the jewish Gary Gensler, who refused to look at any litigation against the jewish Larry Fink's anti-competitive practices. What Fortune! And when these issues were raised in Congress, who defended this anti-competitive scheme? Well, of course it was defended by a coalition of Democrats, a third of whom were jewish (5 of the 15 defenders of ESG were jewish — what are the odds!). In other words: • 2004 start of ESG begun by jewish asset managers • 2008 collapse caused by jewish asset managers • post-2008 regulations favor jewish asset managers • post-2008 agitprop heavily favors a jewish-led slave revolt in morality • post-2008 criminal activities by jews protected by jews in regulatory agencies • post-2008 bypasses to the regulatory agencies guarded against by a majority of jewish representatives The slave revolt in morality we have experienced most sharply post-2016 ("woke") was funded by jewish asset managers and coordinated and sustained by jews in positions of power. These are undeniable facts, and jews themselves admit that these facts are true. Nevertheless, the slaves of the Celebration Parallax fear that they do not have permission to name their own enslavers.
Pillz rank	Mon Jan 19 23:37:22 Hollow words, repeated into your lonely little void, because you've long since lost the ability to think properly. A tragedy, really, but when handicapped by a feminine mind as you are, it is to be expected. It must be harrowing to know that your ancestors accomplished nothing in almost two millenia except to erode everything Europe has ever built, be it through war or through poisoning intellectualism for the sake of being edgy. You fight not for righteous justice, but because you are driven by the cancerous imperative to tear down anything you envy and replace it with something disastrous. This is, of course, the subconscious motive for your entire 15 years of political and social commentary. It is not that western civilization is worth championing, or the truth worth exposing. These are lies you tell yourself, to self soothe and find solace in some imagined place amongst your civilized peers. But the truth is, if you'd been born a decade earlier, you'd probably be in Minnesota right now yelling at ICE agents.
Cherub Cow rank	Mon Jan 19 23:48:48 [pillz]: "Hollow words, repeated into your lonely little void, because you've long since lost the ability to think properly." Zero substance projection. You are just another slavish leftist. Pathetic. [pillz]: "It must be harrowing to know that your ancestors accomplished nothing" You don't know who my ancestors were, though in your low-IQ stupor you seem to think that I am wholly German. Retarded attempt at inductive reasoning, shitfag. "[Erm, CC is saying true things about the Germans. CC must be German. I am very smrt. Smrt smrt smrt.]" — Fucking retard [pillz]: "You fight not for righteous justice, but because you are driven by the cancerous imperative to tear down anything you envy and replace it with something disastrous." Nope. That's jewish slave morality. Obvious projection and inversion of any of my meanings; I have never elucidated any such disastrous thinking. I have consistently celebrated the West's Glorious Traditions from a specifically American perspective. I wish to tear down nothing but the foreign idols of the "Global South" that were built only recently in scorn to the West. [pillz]: "But the truth is, if you'd been born a decade earlier, you'd probably be in Minnesota right now yelling at ICE agents." Zero foundation for this in any reasoned understanding. I was posting about Ayn Rand in high school, so you haven't got a fucking clue. You have nothing. You're just like williamthebitchfag trying to obstruct. • Hrothfag did the same thing when I started a thread on election litigation. • Duckfaggot did the same when I started talking about Biden's dementia in a thread series on totalitarians • williamthecoward did the same with the Border Treason threads You're just being a disingenuous leftist. It's not convincing. It's pathetic. Grow up.
Cherub Cow rank	Tue Jan 20 01:17:03 We can see a good example here of how the jew Andrew Goldstein deconstructs White identity to effect White genocide: [clipped moment] [December 31st, 2025] http://x.com/f4tr3t4rd/status/2006608207326883889 Full episode here: "I Confront Britain's Biggest RAC*ST" [Andrew Gold; December 29th, 2025] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSuXaBpGlA4 Andrew Goldstein employs a series of notable subversions in this podcast, which, honestly, would take a day to fully list. The very intro is a subversion meant to inform the audience of how to perceive the information, as is common in jewish agitprop (see, for instance, the jewish-hosted and jewish-produced show "60 Minutes", which always narrativizes and deceives with editing). One notable element is something I remarked on a video that clipped the interview: ------------- •"run the clock down" Exactly! They do this constantly. Once you notice it you cannot not notice it, particularly because it is not just limited to in-person debates. The strategy is to keep the conversation from being productive (in any media, including social media and even plain-text Internet forums). It's part of the Celebration Parallax ("That's not happening and it's good that it is!"). They argue both positions simultaneously, but they prefer to keep you in the first position ("It's not happening"). This keeps you from recognizing that there is even a problem for long enough that you are black-pilled into their later position of "It's too late anyways." If they can delay the debate within this zone, then no productive thought can occur. Whereas, if you are not spending more time considering the solutions to the reality, then your own solutions may remain underdeveloped and ineffective. You must move past the delays of deceivers. For in-person debates, this would potentially mean moving forward with your position "as a hypothetical" even as they continue to deny the reality. -------------- This is particularly notable given pillz' meltdowns above and the catalogue of similar obstructions from UP's leftists. These sorts of distractions are designed to impede thought — not explore truth or consider futures. Subversives and disrupters will attempt to stop the Right from even proceeding with the debates on their steel-man terms because they fear a conclusion of which they would not approve. In the case of the intent of this thread, I am currently laying out the facts of the jewish question so that we may understand in later posts how world leaders are contributing to the issue (i.e., aiding the jew), working around the issue (e.g., with parallel societies and non-intervention), facing the issue (e.g., mainstreaming the issue), or dis-empowering the jew (e.g., eroding international support for the jew). Senseless disruptors want none of these issues examined, hence, they do not even want the facts available to facilitate further examination. This is part of the "final solution" propaganda which the propagandized accept (erroneously) as the only solution to the Question. That is, the propagandized assume that anyone speaking of the jewish Question necessarily must want jewish genocide, but this is outright false and even quite stupid. This is a conditioned response from totalitarian thought reform. We will ignore it in these threads. In the case of Goldstein's positions and his own strategy of running down the clock, he has to deconstruct White identity because if people do not even know what White people *are* then the Bolshevik plan of genociding them may continue; the debate can go nowhere. This same strategy is employed with Palestinians and even with women. Palestinians need little explanation, but as a quick note, the jew says that there has never been a Palestinian state because the jew means to destroy the Palestinian state. It is a simple rhetorical deception (an occult self-fulfilling prophecy). In the case of women, Matt Walsh's mock-umentary "What is a Woman?" ironically broaches this point, but the deeper implication is part of a civilization-destroying method: if women themselves are deconstructed, then they too will cease to exist. This is where we must realize the actual scheme, however: the jew is not talking about "women" in general anymore than corrupt UK politicians are concerned with "men" committing rapes when truly it is specifically Pakistani men and various imported foreigners committing the majority of rapes. That is, when the jew deconstructs "women", it is as a means specifically to deconstruct White women. This fact is made available to us through the obvious double standards of the rhetoric (i.e., *who* is deconstructed and *who* is *not*). It is White women who are deconstructed as "birthing persons", LGBTQ2S+, and various inventions. Meanwhile, the same people using these inverted terms will openly discuss the women of the Global South without any issue of definition or deconstruction ailing them. Thus, the women of the Global South will improve Western birth rates, but the White women of the West do not even exist and never have. It is genocidal rhetoric. On the same route, I explain this to a user in the comments shortly after the video aired: --------- You have to understand what's beneath his words. • When he says, "Unfortunately," he does not mean the word itself. His tone is pure apathy and even mockery and gloating. He has this same tone of scoffing repeatedly in his interactions here, especially his frequent interruptions of "Yah, yah." • When he says, "I count myself among them", he is playing a deception. He knows that he is not White, and he knows that his real people will not go extinct. He knows that his people will hide among the new hosts; it is only his White genetics that will be shed. You can tell this fact because in this same interview he deconstructs White identity to be meaningless. He is pretending to be something that he is also pretending does not exist. It is a deception via duplicity. • When he says, "At some point," he is invoking a self-fulfilling prophecy. A person who cannot see your people in the future means to make a future where you do not exist. • When he says that he means some thousand years in the future, it is because he noticed that the near future was shocking, so he is adjusting to try to ease White people into the warm bath of obliteration. He means to destroy White people but wishes that White people would not notice so that they will not fight back. All of these things are available if you pay attention to his facial expression and tone. Regarding self-fulfilling prophecies, this is a common tactic with psychopaths of his type. If they can get you to adopt their vision of the future, then you, as the mark, will pursue the psychopath's vision. The vision is psychopathic because the outcome is your obliteration. Psychopaths playing with these occult self-fulfilling prophecies will hide behind words such as "inevitable", because they are determinists trying to enslave you to their twisted futures. --------- We can see through Goldstein's series of deceptions here to arrive at these firm premises. He claims to be "White" but deconstructs "White" to be meaningless, so he truly does not find himself to be White. In separate admissions he admits that he is indeed jewish above all, and in a separate admission he claims that jews were everywhere before anyone else. This last point is of crucial significance since it speaks to the jew's delusional and international character. If the jew believes that the presence of a single jew in a nation at any point in its history means that jews have a claim to that nation forever, then we see their psychopathy (this is an absurd way of making a claim; it is similar to the claims made by children claiming chairs) and we see their megalomaniacal nature (that they believe that they own the entire world the moment that they touch it with their narcissism). Neither position is defensible from a Western framework (neither psychopathy nor narcissism), but we must recognize these operating principles within the jew. Thus, emergent in the way that the jew Goldstein handled this debate is in what it means for the jewish position. We see above with Schueftan that the jew believes that White people should never be allowed to collectivize (in any nation at all). So the punishment of White people by the jew was not to stop with the punishment of Germany during and after the World Wars; it was a punishment of all White people for the "crime" of their very existence with Germany being a stepping stone for this goal. On a generational level, we can see that the consequence of this ideology is outright genocide by killing and/or genocide via miscegenation (the jew Kalergi's "race of the future"). Hence, Goldstein believes in the jewish position, which is that White people will go extinct. We know further that this extinction is not a mere natural consequence of civilization but an intentional subversion and a direction that is forced by the jew. It is, after all, jews who push for mass-immigration by their own words (e.g., Judea Pearl's statement above). From a rhetorical standpoint, it is a deterministic and materialistic fallacy to believe that the natural consequence of humanity is total and homogenized miscegenation, since humans are not particles dispersed in solution but rather are behavioral beings capable of preferential regulation (e.g., borders between peoples). It is only in an enslaver's fantasy that all peoples except for one's own are dispersed particles without souls while the enslaver alone is distinct, exceptional, and "Chosen". It is, conversely, the West's tradition that all peoples of the world can remain unique while uplifting themselves to become more conscious, more en-souled, more distinct, and more exceptional among themselves by their own values, traditions, and beliefs in a total end to all international enslavement schemes. So we see again how the West is at odds with jewish slave morality. Their formula would make all of humanity into beings without consciousness (the perfect slaves) while our formula would result in every individual in the world having a mind worth absolutely protecting and capable of self-protection as a sovereign (perfectly un-enslaveable). It is this rift and the jew's global messianic totalitarian ambitions which provoke them to genocide White people. A people who insists that the world be composed entirely of slaves will cull those who resist such an enslavement. Thus, we will need to discuss factions within the jew who oppose or support these schemes of global enslavement. Were we to adopt Schueftan's own premise that a people, when collectivized, reveals their nature, then we might conclude that it is the nature of the jew (in general) to enslave other peoples and create subservient animals. But, we must also recognize the sickness in Schueftan's way of thinking. For instance, we know also that it is jewish international policy for a people to be eroded from within via the appointment of slavish leftists into positions of power. Does this arrangement not change the character of the collective? Certainly it does, though we admit also that this is foreign meddling. Schueftan admits this peripherally in his talk of different collectives which display differing degrees of difficulty for the jew. He speaks in particular of Syria and how the natural state of those people is that their leaders must be dictators, since Syria as a nation cannot keep its collective together without that form of leadership. His belief is that Syria must be brutal or else Syria will dissolve. Further, since Syria is brutal and is against the jew, he says that there is no circumstance where Syrians can collectivize while allowing the jew to survive, hence Syria is a jewish enemy in Schueftan's absolute sense; he does not even think that Regime change could ever work. As a pragmatist, he indicates that this means that Syria has been selected by the jew for total extermination. Can we ask this question of collectivization of the jew? That is, what is the structure of jewish internationalism which defines its character? Can its character be changed through leadership? Is there a Regime change which could alter this character? We see already that there are many issues which no jewish leader should support if they are to remain in the West or remain enfranchised. jewish genocide schemes, for instance, are intolerable to the world. No jew should believe that any jew or all jews are "Chosen", since this is a belief which can only propagate enslavement. The list could easily be expanded to reject money-lending / usury, deception as a political practice, social-engineering, totalitarianism, communism, wealth redistribution from one ethnicity to any other ethnicity (e.g., taxation which is designed to take from productive members and give to the non-productive). Could these be abolished and still allow the jew to thrive? We see also that Heinlein's solution has been largely rejected by the oligarchs of the jewish diaspora-collective. Heinlein realized that a silver bullet would be that no one can hold the franchise without earning it through difficult service. The result of this formula would be an immense loss of jewish power in the West. The response from jewish slave armies was to call this formula "fascism". And yet, we see that there is mandatory service in "Israel". The distinction is that this service is not required for enfranchisement, and the collective's interests endure regardless of any such service, so Heinlein's formula is not actually in place in "Israel". But could it be in the West?
murder rank	Tue Jan 20 02:40:52 So apparently Jesus was a devil worshiper.
Cherub Cow rank	Tue Jan 20 03:47:10 [murfag]: "So apparently Jesus was a devil worshiper." Literally the opposite. jews worship Memnoch the Devil, since they followed the child-sacrificing gods and merely stole the idea of a one God when they saw further powers of inversion and destruction. jews were "Chosen" by Satan, since no people is chosen by any other. Christ, meanwhile, was disgusted by the plans of the jew, flipped their tables, and built up a coalition of followers who would oppose the jew and his devil worship. For this the jew executed Christ for betraying them and for betraying their Satan. ....... Tucker Carlson had on Peter Brimelow today, and they spoke about jewish ethnonationalism and the jewish plan to reduce the amount of White people in these United States: [January 19th, 2026] http://x.com/TuckerCarlson/status/2013333159249686706?t=1287 They mention two things which I've discussed in UP previously: 1) It is largely the left-wing Zionist jews who are the most ethno-nationalist [and psychopathic] 2) jews seem to think that eroding White people in their own lands will result in *less* "anti-Semitic" behavior 1) Of the first point, we see this in particular in the jewish leftist atheist Sam Harris, who flippantly reverses all of his arguments the moment it can mean jewish advantage. There is zero sense of symmetry involved, so you can expect these types will become unhinged and deranged when their arguments implicate themselves. This inability to understand the implication of one's own arguments upon the self is from the jewish stereotype of the vampire, which accurately models that the jew cannot see or comprehend his own reflection. Bram Stoker's "Dracula" (1897) was, of course, about the jew (and we can see a theme here with the 1850s to 1900 where much of literature was recognizing this same issue of the jew's infiltration). Thus, in Dracula are themes of the jew bringing plague rats, infection, famine, mass death, parasitism, and enslavement, often on the wings of their gypsy roots (thieves, fraudsters, deceivers, occultists). Even the idea of the jew drinking blood is from their practice of "Metzitzah B'Peh", where they orally suction blood from the penis of the circumcised child. This practice has been known in rabbinical communities to result in sexually transmitted diseases between rabbis and from rabbis to young children, particularly the transmission of herpes. The vampire thus similarly sucks blood and makes his victims sick in the literal sense as well as in the sense of the social parasite making the worker ill from work that no longer sustains his life, sent away as all wealth is to the jewish creditors. Many have examined this concept of the mirror indirectly to comprehend why the jew lacks this self-awareness. Lacan's "mirror stage", for instance, is not particularly convincing when taken as a psychological metaphor, but when understood as an indirect way to comprehend the jew's evasion of his reflection, it makes far more sense, particularly in relation to the vampire. The vampire, for instance, is an ugly, deformed, dysgenic being that seems vaguely human but is not quite of the right time or of the actual people of a society (vampire as the jewish infiltrator). His fashions seem like they are from a robbed corpse, with them missing the evidence that the vampire understands the living moment. For Lacan, this is a loss of subjectivity. The vampire, as the jew, cannot comprehend (or see himself in) the mirror because he lacks the ability to see beyond his narcissism. The vampire fancies himself superior for his powers, yet, being disfigured and horrifying, cannot face his reality as an object of himself when he looks in the mirror. Instead of seeing a tremendous beauty worthy of the respect that he believes he must have as a "Chosen" being, the jew sees instead a ghastly creature that none could love and none would follow. As vampire, the jew instead uses deception and devil's bargains for power, gaining sexual access to young victims who themselves are not allowed to see the image of the vampire without great terror. In other words, how can the jew believe both that he is "Chosen" (which requires that one be worthy of commanding the world) *and* look himself in the mirror and see his horrifying reflection? The jew accomplishes this by avoiding Lacan's mirror stage: he denies that he is an object in the world, denies the reality of himself, and instead insists that he is "the" subject of the world. We see, of course, how this so often backfires for the jew. How could a people that no one wants to see ever stand in the open and lead the world? It is a contradiction which jews often resolve by managing puppets from the shadows. They try to sell their ideology behind the attractive and noble people of their host population, and, if they believe that their ideology has sold, they unmask and take credit, similar to the story of "Cyrano de Bergerac". The problem is that the ideology often sells because people believe that it results in the attractive and noble person, whereas, if an ideology creates the face of the vampire, then people can more readily comprehend its many deformities. Their slave morality is, therefore, more accepted among these deformed peoples, just as Dracula's most loyal ally is the deranged inmate of an asylum. 2) Of the second point, jews often believe too readily in what the jew Steven Spielberg *critiques* in his movie "Minority Report" (2002). The jewish concept explored in this movie is a familiar "Israeli" policy: that even *potential* enemies of the jew must be proactively annihilated before they can even make the decision to harm the jew. It is this kind of psychopathic behavior which *creates* its own enemies, since if a people who are ambivalent, apathetic, or even tolerant towards the jew finds that they are suddenly being annihilated by the jew via policies of subversion, then the jew will have provoked the very response that they feared would exist — a response that would not have existed were the jew to have taken no such action at all. Thus, Carlson points out this obvious contradiction wherein the jew will provoke his own "oppressors" into their very existence. We might rephrase this to say that in an effort to "reduce" "anti-Semitism", the jew will import people who *actively* hate the jew (e.g., Muslims displaced by jewish wars) believing that this will disempower the White people who *might* *someday* dislike the jew, and the result is that anti-jewish Muslims will attack jews, and White people will have been disempowered by the jew and will be left unable to protect the jew from the jew's own anti-White golem. This seeming contradiction is again reconciled between the "seen" and "unseen" forces of the marketplace of the jew. There is a simple graphic which illustrates this point, but left-wing jews in a target nation invite foreign golems, and whenever these golems attack jews, this gives pretext for the erosion of the rights of the original citizens of the target nation. Simultaneously, jews can use domestic sentiments against their golems to justify foreign wars. So, if an Afghan attacks a synagogue in Detroit, then jews in control of the executive can encourage the bombing of Kabul. We saw this same deception after 9/11, where instead of there being a ban on all Saudi immigrants... we invaded Iraq. It is a total non sequitur, but when we see that the jew is merely redirecting angst for his favor, the strategy is very transparent. In the case of jews creating their own enemies, this too must be understood as not just behavioral reaction but a dysgenic strategy. The jew is not completely unaware that whipping a dog could cause the dog to bite; their intent is to breed a dog which can be beat endlessly and never bite.
Pillz rank	Tue Jan 20 14:11:07 Roflmao Wtb tier crash out
Cherub Cow rank	Tue Jan 20 14:57:10 "It seems like every day or week, another politician is at some bizarre Israel/Jewish event groveling for their donors." Nancy Mace: -------- http://x.com/RepNancyMace/status/2013013579142692995 "Psalm 23: "Even though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil, for You are with me." Israel walks through the valley every day. But they do not walk alone. We will ALWAYS stand with Israel and the Jewish community. God Bless America. God Bless Israel." -------- Most of the boomer political class have been ideologically possessed by the lie of "our greatest ally", so they will likely be lost to history. These people often have the same thought-terminating clichés in place as the left, so they are mentally incapable of examining the framework of their enslavement. You could explain that jewish subversives have lied to them about a "Judeo-Christian" tradition (something which does not exist and was falsified in the post-WWII acceleration of Bolshevik subversion of these United States), or you could explain that dispensationalism is a heresy, but they'll just sit there saying some cliché lie such as, "If you bless 'Israel' you will be blessed" (e.g., as said the slave Ted Cruz to Tucker Carlson). You could even tell them that that quotation ("If you bless..") was itself manufactured by works such as the "Scofield Reference Bible" (invented around 1909) or the "Good News Bible" (invented around 1966), and their eyes will glaze over, with their thought-reform returning them to a series of masses wherein their faith leaders lied to them by presenting many such quotations as true and foundational to the moment of Christ's crucifixion. I.e., they will say that these lies are "Biblical" without noting that this "Biblical" teaching was invented to win favor with jews post-1900. As for the heresy, even were Christians to accept the falsified phrase of "blessing Israel" as perhaps being from God's words to Abraham, they still must disregard two key elements: 1) "Israel" is not the jews 2) The Second Covenant requires Good Works Slaves of the jews address point "1)" by claiming that the Bible must have foreseen today's exact iteration of "Israel", which is, of course, an absurdity. The absurdity of this is revealed simply by asking whether or not foreign subversives and destroyers could read the Bible and say, "[Actually, that's about me. I'm Israel.]" And indeed that has taken place and is its own thought-terminating cliché: "Am Yisrael Chai". This particular cliché, of course, was invented in 1965... right before the Good News Bible (purely coincidences afoot, I'm sure). Of the second point, the heresy is far more severe and obvious: dispensationalists and the slaves of the jew make an exception for the "Chosen". That is, the slaves of the jew reckon that the jew must be "blessed" unconditionally, which is an absolute violation of the Second Covenant since this means that jews do not have to do any Good Works; they can do anything they want (including, e.g., pedophilia, rape, torture, lie, infiltrate, destroy, subvert, degrade) and still be "blessed" despite it all. This is egregiously Anti-Christ. Incidentally, this could be why Sam and Rugian, like many slaves of the jew, refuse to answer the question: "Is there any condition that you would impose upon the jew's ambitions?" ( http://uto...hread=95445&time=1767992312018 ). This short circuits the slave's thinking because the question implicates their permissiveness towards all of the jew's grotesque actions. We need not speculate on how this "could" be implemented since we see it in how the slaves of the jew justify the atrocities inflicted not just upon the Palestinians but upon the jew's other Middle East enemies and upon the White West. These slaves are not allowed to celebrate any victories by White people unless these victories are on behalf of their jewish enslavers, hence they bottle-up angst about Somalians domestically while accepting foreign intervention: "[We couldn't possibly deport Ilhan Omar, but we can attack Somalia for "Israel", then receiving even more of Somalia's fraudsters in our nation because of the war refugees that we created for "Israel".]" This essentially amounts to the boomer sportsball viewer being allowed to celebrate the victories of a sportsteam composed entirely of blacks from around the nation who combat other blacks from around the nation, while the sportsball viewer has no team that represents his own people from his own locale. Even his sports are an internationalist's degraded vision of conflict, since the activities are entirely those of paid mercenary armies. He can sometimes champion a White quarterback for a long contract in his city, but that quarterback will change teams if his jewish masters provide the correct financial incentives. This sense of betrayal is immediately replaced with the slave's pondering, "[Well, maybe our team will look good this year with the new guy.]" Similarly, it is White war-fighters who predominantly engage in the jew's wars, but the slave is not allowed to realize why it is that it is predominantly White people who defend their nation and were thus in the ranks for the jew's wars (Where are the slave's black sportsball players? Why are they not in combat?), and he is not allowed to ask why he can celebrate the heroism of the Battle of Mogadishu but is not allowed to consider why it is so unpalatable for there to be a Battle of Minneapolis. Certainly he would prefer that Trump leave Minneapolis alone and attack Mogadishu instead, since it is only abroad that this same ethnic rivalry can benefit the jew. So we see again the utility of Orwell's "1984" warning of the processes of the jewish Bolsheviks in historical revision. The jew can poison even your sacred texts to mean their complete inversions, and when disseminated to the masses of slaves via the jew's infiltration of the "culture industry", this inversion is accepted. Since the slave is ultimately within a collective of conformists, he cannot individually reason outside of this inversion. He simply serves Satan and calls Satan "God". He cannot even think of the simplest proof of this: that his God should want him to live, but Satan wants him to die. And what does the jew prefer happen to his people?
Cherub Cow rank	Tue Jan 20 15:03:49 [pillz (pathetic little boy)]: "Wtb tier crash out" Sam Adams weakly tried this same obvious lie when he compared me to williamthebastard — exclusively because I was speaking of the jew, of course. (You share your slavery in common with him.) But there is no evidence that this is a "crash out". Are my words not measured and considerate? Am I spamming ChatGPT? Am I being unreasonable? The answers are obvious (Yes, I am measured and considerate; no, I am not spamming; yes, I am being reasonable). When williamthebastard has a "crash out", he becomes less and less reasonable or coherent. His mind departs him and he disrupts, desperate to hijack and delay debate from the needs of his sickly narcissism. It is this descent into lies, disruption, and desperate pleas which now define you — not me. You are too pathetic even to accomplish your task since you, like williamthebastard, cannot even read. This is your nature, and you will never overcome it.
Pillz rank	Tue Jan 20 15:38:09 You and wtb share genetics and the illness of Nazi ideology. You are merely more verbose and circular.
Habebe rank	Tue Jan 20 15:42:43 Cc has gone full Nazi now? Gotta admit, Russel Crowe played a likeable Goering
Pillz rank	Tue Jan 20 15:44:42 It is the only explanation for their defense of Germanic filth and immediate default to 'muh leftist'. The truth was always going to come out.
Cherub Cow rank	Tue Jan 20 15:58:11 [pillz]: "You and wtb share genetics" If you could read you would know that this is false and that I addressed your obvious error already. It's pretty pathetic of you to repeat this lie while believing you've uncovered some great truth. You're like a leftist screaming the same refrain at a "protest" because your mind is simply not present. Some have started calling this "looper" behavior (i.e., looping a lie for pathetic disruption rather than discourse). You can't even be spoon-fed since your consciousness has been hijacked into repeating lies rather than examining new information. [Habebe]: "Cc has gone full Nazi now?" This is a pathetic thought-terminating cliché. One of the firewalls against the jewish question is that useful idiots have been propagandized into thinking that even addressing the question must make someone a "nazi", whereas, this is transparently stupid. It is only conformists and low-IQ useful idiots who fall for this deception. Is that your nature? Are you too a slave? Was Winston Churchill a "nazi" for publishing this document? "Zionism versus Bolshevism A Struggle for the Soul of the jewish People" by Winston S. Churchill. http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Zionism_versus_Bolshevism Why have so many people from around the world — outside of Germany! — asked these questions? Were they all "nazis"? Certainly that is the delusion of the slavish left. You might want to consider why you too have been enslaved to this thought reform.
Pillz rank	Tue Jan 20 16:14:38 Reading your posts lost any value years ago as you admittedly do not intend for them to ever be read. The audience should always be the primary consideration of any oration. Besides that, your immediate default to 'muh leftistssssss' in response to being accused of Germanic subhuman heritage is indicative of your inability to engage in debate with anything but an empty text box. Carry on
Cherub Cow rank	Tue Jan 20 16:22:04 [pillz]: "Reading your posts" So you're illiterate, yes, exactly. This explains your many lies. You have to lie as a substitute for engagement and comprehension. There is no such thing as writing text in a forum to an audience that cannot read; the medium eliminates the audience, as you have eliminated your own mind. You are speaking of another medium: TikTok. This illiteracy, impotence, and inefficacy is your inescapable nature. It spreads over the whole of your life. ... "Reminder that every single western leader alive today is infinitely more evil than Hitler as Hitler would never have imported third world immigrants into his own country, the most evil act imaginable" http://x.com/ZoomerHistorian/status/2013583469444477184 Why would jews do what Hitler would not? Are jews worse than Hitler?
Pillz rank	Tue Jan 20 16:28:05 The dishonesty innate to your people continues to shine through as the seams of your mind fray and you becoming increasingly less coherent. Please, continue
Cherub Cow rank	Tue Jan 20 17:58:14 [pillz (lie looper)]: "innate to your people" Ah, so more repetition of a lie from the lie looper. pillz the slave is still too illiterate to overcome his erroneous belief that he is speaking to a German. He will repeat this lie to "run the clock down", as I explained above. The liar's first lie will compel him to invent new lies. And thus do we see how the ideologically possessed useful idiots of Regime thought reform all degrade into the same thought-terminating clichés when their enslavers are opposed? The slavish infiltrators of the Right adopt the exact same tactics as the left because this vital dogma is sourced from their same slave morality. What pillz is attempting here is little different from a leftist entering a college conference room in 2016 to shout down a Right-wing speaker. His attempted insult of "[kill all Germans]" as a proxy for his belief that I am "[German]" is barely any different than williamthecoward talking about murdering all of the "[nazi whores]" — and in fact this archetype of the German is itself sourced from the same jewish agitprop. A century of agitprop that has us accept that our enemy is the jew's enemy! Of the slave's aversion to truth, tumblefaggot has thoroughly shown his resistance to truth and makes a good example, as pillz is demonstrating here likewise. Do we not see how tumblefaggot will always return to a thread to say the same old lies no matter how the facts of a matter have been demonstrated in refutation of his lies? It is the same symptoms: leftists without memories and without conscience must repeat the lies and thought-terminating clichés of the Regime as a substitute for self-examination. We must recall an easy example with Trump and the "fine people" hoax. Regime media likely knew that it was a lie, but it was a lie that to them was worth repeating. In repeating the lie, they could appeal to the conformism of those who wanted to believe the lie (e.g., "[All of these 'experts' and fellow leftists believe that this happened, so I must believe as they do, and this affirms *our* hatred of Trump, so it must be so.]"). This also deceives people who were disengaged when the lie was first litigated and who "[arrive in the middle]" so-to-speak; they may have heard that it was a lie, but if the lie persists then they may conclude that at some point (in their absence from the discourse) the lie became true. ("[An investigation must have taken place. Our 'experts' must have peer-reviewed it. They must have discovered the truth if they are still repeating this talking point]"). Leftists are ultimately conformists, whereas the Right can speak the truth no matter how many people will disagree or fear its utterance. It is in this respect that we see that pillz is just another leftist and conformist. He must repeat this lie because this slave dogma advances the slave revolt's positions, which ultimately favors the jew, his enslaver. Do we not see similar cowardice in UP's more overt leftists? Certainly. Because why, truly, can tumblefaggot not be convinced of even the smallest truths? The biggest barriers are his IQ and his psychosis, and we see these afflicting pillz as well; but perhaps above even these is that the conformist fears knowing something which is incommunicable to his group. What good is the truth if he cannot utter it? This is why the conformist avoids truths which he knows that the group does not already know. The conformist must have it such that his entire memory can be catalogued and downloaded to the hive, but if he has memories that he cannot communicate to the hive, then will they notice gaps in his stories? ("[Exactly what book were you reading this weekend, comrade?]") This is the conformist's ultimate struggle with The jewish Question. He knows, intuitively, that this is ground that he has been taught to fear. This is ground that is incommunicable. He cannot learn these truths and then speak of them at the office water cooler. He fears that he may learn a vocabulary which has no euphemisms, and should he fail to code-switch, he will be found out and made a pariah. He has talked himself into a prison. By knowing nothing he can remain inside. We will move beyond such small persons. These sorts have never moved the wheels of history. They hesitate endlessly. They say always that "tomorrow" they will learn, but they never do. They perceive a library but cannot make out a single title. And at last, all of their daily compromise is swept aside by those who possess Courage and who are determined to seize their destiny. The drone is the foe of all; only the Creator births Victory. We shall have it. ....... Now that we know that the jew is antithetical to the West and is managing its downfall, we will look at the structure of world jewry. This will be done in stages and work towards a useful outline. We know, for instance, that the center of jewish power is not "Israel" but international finance, which the jew unites with his rootless cosmopolitan nature. Even so, despite the jew's international character, he does indeed possess locations in the real world. The City of London is one such infamous location — a place within London proper which holds jewish finance operations such as the infamous Rothschild family building. We know, additionally, that much of our outline has already been examined in the totalitarians threads, since in exposing global totalitarianism we were in fact exposing world jewry. Thus the Octopus model of their operations has already been given to us in their own corporate documents (e.g., the 2004 United Nations document "Who Cares Wins", which shows the Octopus model and how it leverages "sustainability" for global totalitarianism). Additional detailing of operations is catalogued in this video, but this will need to be cleaned up for a proper diagram of their international strategy since this video-maker was merely listing jewish organizations: "Exposing World Jewry - How It All Works" [January 6th, 2026] http://rum...e6-fa6a-4961-a1d1-f5bf669f8973
Pillz rank	Tue Jan 20 18:13:04 Keeping a journal would be better for your mental and cardiac health than writing 800 words that end in some random allusion to a creator, when you're godless, tradition-void, and in an intellectual death spiral.
williamthebastard rank	Tue Jan 20 21:12:41 Hey Cherub Cunt, I was just thinking - since your nazi porn Onlyfans site doesnt seem to have ever taken off and Pillz wants to die, why dont you combine your talents? Both you and Twitch are neo-Nazi worshippers of the pedophile God King. Twitchy, the intermittently homeless meth tweaker according to his posts probably only weighs about 100 lbs, so you could likely dress him up in kids clothes and make him look about 12 years old. Then you could sit on his face making sure to spread your gaping cunt flaps over his face and nose and crush and suffocate him with your 500 lb bodyweight. You might scream “die youse fackn jooz moosluhm libruhl commie baster!!” when you cum over his face just to really get your mentally ill Nazi buddies to really jack their cum all over the screen. This way, youre all happy. Pillz finally gets to die, you get to have sex for the first time in 30 years and your Maga followers will love the pedophile angle. Anyway, think about it!
williamthebastard rank	Tue Jan 20 21:20:52 Not sure what you nazi pedophile worshippers call that kind of stuff - snuff pedo-porn or something? Anyway, you'll know the right branding terminology
Pillz rank	Tue Jan 20 21:23:29 Wtb bestows his professional work history upon us unprompted
Habebe rank	Tue Jan 20 23:32:37 Cc, Your literally using Nazi Terminology. Now that said, I'm one who thinks the Nazis were portrayed worse than they were. Take the holocaust out of the equation and they don't seem so bad.....admittedly that's a big thing to overlook.
murder rank	Wed Jan 21 14:53:50 "Indeed we will also discuss how jewish programming has made mindless people such as yourself immediately believe that any talk of the jew must necessarily accelerate to thought-terminating clichés." Yes, it will accelerate to terminating their thoughts ... and all bodily functions.
murder rank	Wed Jan 21 14:54:44 "Take the holocaust out of the equation and they don't seem so bad.....admittedly that's a big thing to overlook." Monty Python? -
murder rank	Wed Jan 21 15:06:57 Christians who hate Jews make absolutely no sense. Jesus was a Jew. He was born a Jew of a Jewish mother, and he died a Jew. Jesus did not found a new religion. He was supposed to be the fulfillment of Jewish prophesy. He was supposed to be their Messiah. Christianity sprouted up later. Christianity was founded by Jews. Christianity is not separate from Judaism, it is an offshoot. You may (or may not) be a Christian, but Jesus (assuming he still exists) is STILL a Jew. True Christians are just Jews that accept Jesus as their Messiah.
jergul rank	Wed Jan 21 17:03:17 Yepp. So much wool spun from prophet accreditation issues.
Pillz rank	Wed Jan 21 18:50:32 While the bible gives Jews the space and time to repent, they're in no way gods chosen people due to their rejection of Christ. Gods new covenant is not with Jews but with the church (Christians) Christians that hate Jews are just intelligent people. Anyone intelligent can and should hate Jews.
williamthebastard rank	Wed Jan 21 19:15:40 Christ almighty, its like Murder actually thinks these filthy fucks actually are christians rather than white supremacists who use the label christianity as a gang identifier, a code word for American white supremacist. Their Jesus is an infantile, cartoonish Father Christmas from Texas with big muscles, a Hollywood hairdo and AR 15s who kills and imprisons people with dark skin and protects their pedophile God King and isnt even remotely related to the NT
williamthebastard rank	Wed Jan 21 19:18:00 The complete and utter antithesis of the NT
Pillz rank	Wed Jan 21 20:02:22 William 'guzzled more cum than kamala Harris' the bastard, theologian confuses heretical baptists with actual Christians, despite the fact those he described are universally zionists One day you'll make an accurate statement.
Cherub Cow rank	Wed Jan 21 20:09:10 [Habebe]: "Cc, Your literally using Nazi Terminology." No. Be specific or get rekt. Quote me, coward. [murderfag]: "Christians who hate Jews make absolutely no sense. [/] Jesus was a Jew." Do we see how these slaves cannot read? None of them can. They enslave themselves by their own natures. Their ignorance is how they stay enslaved, and they will it upon themselves. ... "President of the Conference of European Rabbis: "The rise of the extreme right in many European countries is a response to the insecurity felt by the old Europeans, 'so-called old Europeans,' regarding the new immigrants... fighting Islamophobia and antisemitism is in interest of both religions."" [January 21st, 2026] http://x.com/disclosetv/status/2013910057965047894 In this case we see the jewish plan laid bare yet again. The jew intends to use Islamic hordes to destroy White Europa. The "old Europeans" are those who have not accepted the masses of displaced Muslims from the jew's war project of Greater Israel. Once again, they displace the "Global South" to burn the lands for their own conquest, then they send those same "Global South" slaves to the West to destroy the nationalism of White nations. So we see the same strategy: 1) Intentionally subvert Western nations so that they attack the enemies of the jew in the Middle East 2) Use subverted leftists in the West to welcome in mass-migration to further destroy Western nations; poison the universities with jewish doctrine while complaining only that these poisoned leftists have not accepted the jew as their master-enslaver 3) Blame the West itself for not accepting its annihilation, thus using international agitprop to convince the "Global South" that it has the mandate of Heaven to destroy the West Do we see again how this reflects the warning of Villeneuve's Dune? In Villeneuve's Dune, it is specifically the jewish Timothée Chalamet who is cast as Paul Atreides. On Arrakis, he makes warriors of a literal "Global South" by going to the "uninhabitable zone" where he finds the "radicals" and "extremists". The cast list of these extremists is a direct reflection of the "Global South" of our real world (that is, as opposed to the Southerners of Herbert's Dune, wherein Chani, for instance, appeared as a White elven type; in Villeneuve's Dune, these Southerners are all brown-skinned). The enemy of this "Global South" is House Harkonnen, who, in Villeneuve's Dune in particular, are an especially White race who celebrate under a "black sun". (This "black sun" did not exist as such in the book; this was added specifically for Villeneuve's Dune.) All of the cast who play these Harkonnen are European or Westerners. Much of their cruelty is even altered from the book to fit a European character for Villeneuve. Using prophecies of "oppression" seeded by the jewish Bene Gesserit (the Bene Gesserit are futuristic jews; a distillation of the mtDNA of the jew), the jewish Paul Atreides provokes a slave revolt in morality among Islamic hordes of the Global South, who perform a mass ethnic cleansing of the last remaining White people of Arrakis — these White people having already purged their own White rivals on behalf of the jewish Bene Gesserit (White House Harkonnen purges White House Atreides due to the emperor listening to jewish Bene Gesserit schemes). And is this a benevolent plan? No. Chani herself is the voice of the "Global South" who knows that this is a deception: "This prophecy is how they enslave us!" Chani knows that the jewish Bene Gesserit have seeded this entire strategy and that her people are being used to destroy the jew's enemies. The jewish Paul Atreides is able to point the way because the jew has once again opened the Gates of Toledo and thus knows which doors are unlocked for the Islamic hordes and the "Global South" radicals. Chani becomes the same warning (tomorrow) within the "Global South" that White Westerners issue (today). We are being used for jewish wars, and our "reward" will be our annihilation and enslavement: The jew Atreides: "If I go south, all my visions lead to horror. Millions of people dead because of me." Gurney Halleck: "Because you lose control?" The jew Atreides: "Because I gain it." "I see a holy war spreading across the universe like an unquenchable fire."
williamthebastard rank	Wed Jan 21 20:37:46 If Jesus was born today he would be deemed a Palestinian, what with Bethlehem being a Palestinian city.
williamthebastard rank	Wed Jan 21 20:40:29 and would probably, once again, have been killed by the israelites. Some things never change
Pillz rank	Wed Jan 21 20:47:53 CC is so defensive and snappy. Here is a clip of what they and habebe could do if CC wasn't so unhinged https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1CfA4jpjBK/
Habebe rank	Wed Jan 21 21:03:46 Cc, "The Jewish question" Idk if the phrase was adopted by the Nazis, but much like we don't call it a charlie Chaplin mustache....you see where I'm going with this.
Cherub Cow rank	Thu Jan 22 00:14:51 [Habebe]: "Idk if the phrase was adopted by the Nazis" Ah, yes, so as I suspected: illiterate retard logic. "Do we see how these slaves cannot read? None of them can. They enslave themselves by their own natures. Their ignorance is how they stay enslaved, and they will it upon themselves."
Pillz rank	Thu Jan 22 01:43:36 Imagine being anti-Jew but then supporting their most faithful tool, the German. Illiterate? No. Retarded.
Pillz rank	Thu Jan 22 01:51:42 To say nothing of your schizophrenic ramblings on Christianity, which you experience and (unwittingly) exhibit cognitive dissonance over A fractured mind trapped in a cave of its own making, unable to turn around and see the light.
Cherub Cow rank	Thu Jan 22 04:06:53 [pillz]: "To say nothing of your schizophrenic ramblings on Christianity, which you experience and (unwittingly) exhibit cognitive dissonance over" We see how the lie-looper continues to loop his lies, as is his nature of impotence, illiteracy, and inefficacy. This is an old talking point of this slave that was already addressed and dismantled thoroughly in another thread ( http://www...hread=95340&time=1765036870617 ). And how, there, did the slave respond? He, in his ignorant stupor, like so many useful idiots, was unable to read! What infamy! And what exactly were his words?: [pillz]: "if CC posted something short enough to bother with." Do we see how the slave repeats these refrains? Do we see the self-deceit and self-degradation within it? "[Oh! I would know the truth if it were fed to me! Oh, but I am a baby, so I will spit out whatever this bothersome airplane attempts to fly into my mouth!]" Again, the illiterate can never be reached with words. Heinlein recognized this of the bio-weapons of the jew in "Starship Troopers". The "juvenile delinquents" — as he recognized that the lies of the social engineers called them — were not some reasoning and enlightened people who simply needed to be told the *reasons* for contributing to a functioning society in order to be rehabilitated. These sorts only respond to force and power. This is why Western society has always thrived when Mind and Hand are one: Force in the hands of those who have the courage to think! We will reach no other type, since this Question is itself only for the Thinking Fighter. [pillz (anti-White retard)]: "Imagine being anti-Jew but then supporting their most faithful tool, the German." Do we see how the slave of the jew can be taught to hate his own people? I can think of very few White people who would deserve my scorn beyond the subverted left of any White nation, and even then I have a hope that with the Right in power that they can be delivered again to the Providence of their own people. Certainly we can look at White nations that are largely composed of subverted leftists and say that these are slaves of jews by such a large metric that we scorn the nation, and of these we could look at perhaps Canada. But do I hate Canadians? No, because I am not an anti-White tool of the jew. Even in the fall of Canada I see a people who has been subverted and who should be loved. Do we deny the benevolence of Avril Lavigne's "Hello Kitty" ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiaYDPRedWQ ). I think not! Were all the poets of Africa assembled for 1,000 years they could not write such bangers. But pillz hates Germans, apparently. He is just another anti-White useful idiot who will watch White people genocided by the international jew's ambitions while, like many such deceived people throughout history, believing that as each of the jew's enemies are destroyed in turn that somehow he is the beneficiary. What self-deceit is held by such corrupted conscience! How could someone proclaim that if the Westfold falls that Gondor will be free to the spoils of all? In that sort of mind, delirium and rancor lives! We have previously catalogued this mistaken belief in suicidal anti-co-belligerence, but we should see how the jew exploits this utility in his bio-weapons: "White Professor's Shocking Comment to Black Students in 1968" [David Hoffman YouTube; July 24th, 2025] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-Knp-Kq1v4 In this old exchange that may well have happened yesterday, a White professor asks of the black bio-weapon what we might today call the "Independence Day" question: — "[Would you, even being a resentful slave, unite with us were we to face an enemy which wishes to destroy us all?]" And how does the slave respond to this question? — "[No.]" The resentment of the slave is such that even as he *too* is to be destroyed in turn by the enslaver of all, that he would rather live to see the death of the animal ahead of him in the chute than to stop the mechanisms of the slaughterhouse. Even as the jew has proclaimed that all White people must die and have any remnant of their DNA be liquidated by his internationalism into a "race of the future", the resentful slave will say, "[But you will first kill the Germans, yes?]" Do we suspect that perhaps the German thought the same of the Russian Kulaks? Only the subverted. Anyone with a mind that can see a single move into the future can see the procession of dominoes. The jew always exploits those who are surprised and delighted by each domino while they stand behind the same cascade. We see an example of this here: --------- "Vincent James (@davincentjames) asks Adam King "If he could get rid of 1 religion, would it be Catholicism or Islam" This caused Gavin McInnes to walk off the debate stage." https://x.com/Kaizerrev/status/1745695765794595032 --------- When asked if the jew would prefer Islam or a faithful jew-serving Christian, the jew tells the Christian Zionists that they are one such domino *ahead* of Islam. Islam does not have the foresight to see dominoes at all, so it is preferable to the jew. It is this prophecy that the jew prefers. Prophecy occurs most readily among those who lack the mind to stop it. The jew's determinism best affects particles in a bottle, and this is the role of the domino. This is the role of the anti-White slave, the Christian Zionist, the Muslim, the "Global South" slave army. "This prophecy is how they enslave us!"
Pillz rank	Fri Jan 23 00:49:04 Don't get confused, you, Cherub Cow, are the only illiterate retard, between the two of us. You can't even recognize the fact that you're incoherent, and have ultimately reduced your position to 'white people > everyone'. This is retarded. It's illiterate. It's typical of someone who is burnt out and deserves to be put down. Continue writing essays about white power or whatever the fuck it is you've reduced your 10+ years of effort to In another 2 or 3 you'll he reduced to what wtb is.
williamthebastard rank	Sat Jan 24 00:08:41 What with fascism being machoism that has gone political, to paraphrase Umberto Eco, female fascists already bear the rotting stench of weirdo daddy issues to begin with. But when they literally worship the most infamous protector and briber of the worlds most infamous pedophile ring - and are also a middle-aged female of the white supremacy brand that lies every minute about family values and staying at home and shitting out white babies but is a childless, middle-aged internet troll - things start getting really weird. I dont think she’s childless and has spent her entire life posting psychotic nazi rants online because of her revolting obesity and hideous ugliness - after all, thats the norm among her american white supremacist peers. Is it because a female, childless, middle-aged pedophile-worshipping neo-nazi sits online for 20 hours a day, she’s actually sitting there waiting for Davy, 9, to respond in the other window to her offer to play with her in the park tomorrow? Maybe play showsie-touchsie? Some daddy issues are more perverse than others
williamthebastard rank	Sat Jan 24 00:11:55 Lmfao, when even Pillz is offended by her psychotic neo-nazism, you know its so off the psycho-charts...
Pillz rank	Sat Jan 24 00:24:58 And yet wtb, you are still more retarded and wrong, amazing
williamthebastard rank	Sat Jan 24 01:01:59 Daddy issues are of course extremely common among the macho-macho-nazi psychotics. Just ask Tweaky whose father had him imprisoned after giving him somewhere to live and being attacked for his kindness a week before Tweaky tried to kill himself lol
williamthebastard rank	Sat Jan 24 01:08:15 But I suppose both the above pedophile worshippers have the same kind of daddy issues. Perhaps, when Tweaky was imprisoned for attacking his father as he describes on UGT, it was because those old memories of him creeping in to his bedroom at 2 am to "tuck him in" came flooding back. Researchers should probably investigate the links between sexual abuse as children and the core of Maga being an obsession with accusing innocents of pedophilia while protecting the most infamous pedophile ring in history. It looks like a lot more than just coincidence.
Cherub Cow rank	Sun Jan 25 03:54:56 [pillz (kikeslave)]: "Don't get confused, you, Cherub Cow, are the only illiterate retard, between the two of us." [pillz (kikeslave)]: "You can't even recognize the fact that you're incoherent," You've openly and repeatedly declared that you have no intent to read my words and are in fact not reading my words, and you have lied repeatedly about several explicit facts which run contrary to your false claims despite my correcting you repeatedly (corrections which, of course, you also did not read, thus enabling your lie-looping). Your claims of my being "incoherent" are worthless when you are not even reading my actual words or citing my actual positions; your straw man fallacies are themselves a result of your illiteracy and therefore have no value. Your projections are impotent and pathetic like your father. ... "Witkoff, Kushner and Josh Gruenbaum meet with Putin at the Kremlin." [January 22nd, 2026] https://x.com/clashreport/status/2014440187682508808 Three jews meet with Putin on behalf of "Trump's" government. Very interesting. It was clear with Biden that jews were present in nearly every governmental position, which represented an astronomical unlikelihood if taken as a pure statistical issue. For instance: • Biden Secretary of State: Antony Blinken • Biden Secretary of the Treasury: Janet Yellen • Director of National Intelligence: Avril Haines • Attorney General: Merrick Garland • Homeland Security Secretary: Alejandro Mayorkas • SEC: Gary Gensler Additional positions (quite a few): http://www...ws-in-the-biden-administration The DNC Border Treason, which was likely the single greatest treason upon these United States, was perpetrated under the jewish Alejandro Mayorkas. Now, under Trump, we see the same cabal of Bolsheviks and a political direction that remains ultimately in the favor of the jew. At best, the jewish Stephen Miller is appealing to Right-wing populism with these necessary mass-deportations, and yet the numbers do not quite seem to be there yet. And at worst, we see jewish handlers brokering deals with other jewish leaders. Putin himself is beholden to the jews of his nation, so it seems purely optics for three jews to be meeting with a jewish puppet rather than with the puppeteers. It could simply be a mirage for the public before that actual meeting takes place. And, of course, as I have said for years now, this conflict between Russia and Ukraine is largely controlled by jews on both sides. The president of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, is, of course, jewish. He, like many jews, was too untalented for complex intrigue but managed to be placed in the propaganda industry as an actor/comedian (see also, Seinfeld, Larry David, Dave Smith, etc.), yet, despite his deficiencies, *was* put in power by the jewish billionaire Ihor Kolomoisky. People should take note that this was very similar to a strategy we almost faced a decade ago in these United States, wherein the comedian/entertainer Jonathan Stuart Leibowitz (also jewish of course), was being groomed by Regime media for a presidential run. He ultimately declined. But, part of the reason that even jewish entertainers are being accelerated for more positions is that they need full coverage now, and they are being forced to draw from their back benches. This is why the incompetent Representative Dan Goldman came to power, for instance; he is not as good of a liar as many of the others, but they needed the position filled. Additionally, it is the jewish Larry Fink who stepped in on behalf of jewish financiers to manage Ukraine's reconstruction. The genocide taking place in Ukraine's forced conscription of its people (i.e., this conflict is prolonged to kill more Ukrainians) is, of course, resulting in an expansion of jewish immigration to Ukraine. jews wish to include Ukraine in their Greater Israel project because it includes jewish holy sites ( https://ww...another-rosh-hashanah-new-year ). Ukraine's utility to the jew also includes its ability to control food production, which allows them to further their anti-competitive internationalist forced-dependency scheme. Do we doubt that the jew would take such cynical actions for their own expansion? Thus, these three jews visiting Putin are merely further coordination occurring for the jewish interests that are managing the entire conflict. Ukrainians are slaughtered to clear lands meant for the jew, and Putin is managed for a planned conflict between BRICS+ and the West. Trump has clearly made deals which he feels are aiding the American position, but the jewish position is not being interrupted at all. Larry Fink's WEF speech seems to indicate very little course-correction for the West; he is pleased with the consolidation of BRICS+ power following the intentional mass-migration of destroyers into the West (this process, of course, preserved BRICS+ power, since they accepted no such immigration). He barely gave lip-service to his Western audience, with his only concession being that he might have been overly optimistic that the Right could be even more controlled and suppressed in target nations. There is no repentance here or adjustment. The plan of the jew to provoke the West into conflict with the "Global South" remains, and the jew is betting on the "Global South" to be the new seat of their power and infiltration for the next 100 years.
williamthebastard rank	Sun Jan 25 06:38:04 The textbook example of projected self-hatred and the disgust these two spitting Nazi mirror images experience when they see their reflections in each other lol…When they are faced with their perfect reflections in each other, they get a glimpse of the same nausea they illicit in the rest of the decent world and lash out toward their mirror images in hatred. Unfortunately I suppose this rules out Tweaky’s live-streamed suicide by gaping cunt :(
Pillz rank	Sun Jan 25 12:42:22 Wtb and (((Cherub Cow))) both wish they were german, and both are blatant Nazis, neither is able to properly articulate themselves without devolving into utter nonsense Lol
Cherub Cow rank	Thu Jan 29 05:24:42 (This comment continuing conversation from the DNC Border Treason thread ( http://uto...hread=95463&time=1769623064522 ) which is actually about this subject) [williamthecoward]: "factually being denoted as Nazis" This is a claim that you still fail to substantiate. Leftists call anyone "nazis" for merely opposing them, so the term is divorced of any impact. By antithesis, it is far more likely that Bolshevism is afoot than "nazism" or "fascism", since the National Socialists and the Italian Fascists were defeated during WWII, but the Bolsheviks were not. Would not the survivors persist over the slain? Yet why do you suppose that such a blind spot exists for the Bolsheviks in the common consciousness? [pillz]: "No, just draw awareness to the fact that you are a pawn of your Jew-Masters, just like your Germans are." The thing is that you really have not offered any substantive argument, and I am actually reading what you're writing while you are (apparently) not reading anything I'm saying, especially if it's longer than a few sentences (so this itself may be futile, but here goes). The closest thing you've given to a steel-man argument there* was sort of hinted at when you said, "your entire 15 years of political and social commentary" ("15 years" is also inaccurate, but let's move on): * (and this requires ignoring your identification of me as an ethnic German, your recent decision to reverse this claim while admitting no fault for your earlier error and pivoting to making a claim that I'm jewish (lulz), and some other outright lies and distortions, such as an obviously erroneous claim that I am speaking "nonsense"; this requires reading between-the-lines to an argument you did not properly elucidate) To the point: The between-the-lines is that you seem to think that approaching the jewish Question is a waste of my years of discourse, which could kind of make sense if you think that I'm here doing some kind of good red-pill work. But even that argument is empty, since not a single leftist here has been convinced of anything ever (there is no red-pilling a psychosis leftist). Even the Right-wing people here, if Zio-Cucks, are immune to reason — on that single issue. So truly, what is the cost of approaching a difficult subject in a place where no one can even be swayed by argument? Clearly, I know that this intellectual stubbornness is present here, so readers should know that the purpose of approaching the subject is a Montaigne strategy of "essay", which is to say examining a subject "to try" to see what truths can be gleaned. It is purely a good-natured examination, since that is my nature. (I love learning and sharing my learning. That is my nature.) As such, I am always open to good-faith reason from others, particularly when it shows remarkable truths, and I am always capable of mentally resetting even when someone such as sebgul momentarily offers it after years of bad faith. This relates to your attempts at insults. You should know that I am immune to those sorts of things. When you speak inaccurately or try to insult me, I do not get emotional, I just see inaccuracies. It's like when williamthecoward tries to suggest that I am unemployed and fat. Neither is true, so I simply feel no relationship to the insult; it has no impact. I know who I am and I run self-diagnostics constantly, so I know what is true of me. So at best those insults are meant to force me into conformism, but I am also not a conformist, so you cannot force me into an opinion through some sort of social dejection. Were I the only person on Earth capable of my opinions, I would still hold them since I arrive at them through deep reasoning. So just as I continued examining.. • 2020 election litigation, • the vaccine-mandate litigation, • Biden's pedophilia, • the global totalitarian Regime • the DNC Border Treason, and • the slave/death climate cult.. ..I was not dissuaded by the attempts at social pressure which permeated those threads. Those techniques only work on conformists, so you are wasting your time attempting them. Hence, I have concluded that wasting my time is one of your only intents here. But *you* can never be a waste of time to me. I am learning from you as well, and I will always appreciate your contributions. ❤️️ If you read none of that, just understand this single metaphor: This thread is "a splinter in your mind" (as per the Matrix). Slightly longer explanation of the metaphor: In Don DeLillo"s "The Falling Man" (2007), in the wake of 9/11 he talks about a "performance artist" (who may or may not have actually existed) who would suspend himself via cables in NYC, recreating the imagery of the "falling man" picture that was taken of someone who jumped to his death during the 9/11 Trade Tower fires. The responses among New Yorkers who saw this display were often disgust, panic, fear, and social contagion. They would demand that police stop the performance, that the man be stopped, that he be punished, that he be exposed, shamed — that the display end. And why? Largely because it was a reminder that the conditions that led to that man jumping are ever-present. Our mortality does not simply recede into immortality just because we have found some comfortable conclusion with which to give ourselves the focus to go about our days. The presence of this performance artist was a reminder that there is an ever-present splinter, something that on some days we suppress better than others. Brought to the jewish Question, we must realize that society has been largely conditioned to treat the Question the same way. In the '90s, movies such as "American History X" (1998) were released as a kind of final "cap" on all examinations of the subversion of our society. "The Matrix" (1999), released less than a year later, foresaw this same malady: a people unable to even say what "The Matrix" *is*. And all of the symptoms are the same: • a truth that is shocking, • a social conformism that demands that we not recognize what bends or breaks the shared delusion, • a truth which, once learned, alienates the knower of this truth; some wish to return to the Matrix, others can no longer taste or see in the same amusing ways... • but others face a truth which gives them the power to change The Cost of a Truth that Cannot Be Faced A truth that the left can never face post-WWII is that peoples around the world are different because they are genetically different, that this genetics informs their culture, that politics is a manifestation of this genetics and culture, and that this politics could only be made completely or sustained by themselves alone. A consequence of not being able to face this truth is that the subverted left become a stream dammed by a giant bolder. They cannot address the bolder, so they must invent a new model of reality which denies a major part of reality. They attempt to flow around the obstruction, but they break apart the ground, they flash-flood, and they damage their own psyche in the process of not being able to say what is simply true. Were they able to dislodge the bolder, they could flow swiftly; but in the presence of the bolder they crash against it and waste themselves in the diversion. Many on the Right have been similarly manipulated. The same totalitarian thought-reform that made far greater gains on the left has afflicted many on the Right. They have been told that the absolute point-of-no-return is to address the jewish Question head-on. They themselves are trapped in the diversions of metaphor. When they face this same Question, they adopt the exact same strategies as the left: • thought-terminating clichés ("nazi!", "fascist!", "anti-Semite!", "transphobe!", "Islamaphobe!", "our greatest ally!") • disruption ("[You can't say that! You shouldn't examine that! You've gone off the deep end!]") • Celebration Parallax ("That's not happening and it's good that it is!") The Splinter and the Relapse Many have remarked on how transparent this conditioning is post-2016, yet many still fall for it today. We saw, post-2016, that the left will truly call anyone a "nazi" for broaching subjects even slightly Right-wing. One would similarly think that the thought-terminating cliché of "nazi" has reached such a crescendo that we might now realize that it is a wall signaling that one must not look beyond its dogma. And yet, the dispensationalist "Right" unironically uses it to refer to those whose curiosity exceeded their own. Their biggest enemies became not just the left but those who realized who, specifically, had been funding the left following 2008 and 2016. The result is that even this dispensationalist "Right" re-inserted the splinter and suppressed it in their minds. You could talk about stopping the left, but you could not talk about stopping the people who empowered them in the first place. In video game logic, it is as though you are allowed to fight the endless enemies generated by a bad-guy-generator, but you cannot attack the generator. So the cost of the splinter is that the dispensationalist "Right" remains incapable of addressing power. The bolder, as the splinter, has re-formed in their relapse, and they must break apart the ground to flow around it. Their ideology is even such that they fortify the bolder so that it will become unassailable in the next left-wing action. Even Trump, who supports their cause by appealing to "Israel", is still not enough for them because jewish power has declared that he is not enough. The dispensationalist "Right" therefore calls for DeSantis, who is even more of a sycophant even than Trump. They laud Ted Cruz for the same. The cost is that they can complain about the left, but at the end of the day they support the people who empower the left against them and their nation. Thus these same dispensationalists alter their ideology for that eventuality, such as in championing a Christianity without borders, wherein White genocide is acceptable so long as the slave armies imported by their enslavers are "Christian"... at least until the rapture, when even these invaders are destroyed or converted in kind. How the Right Has Attempted to Break Free through Metaphor... and Failed And has the Right successfully used metaphor to escape this inability to directly address the Question? No; the splinter remains, since an exception is always granted for these enslavers. • H. G. Wells' "The Time Machine" (1895) is inspired by Nietzsche and brings the jewish Question to its conclusion, imagining the future that the jew intends. The jew conceives of their scheme for enslavement of the world in terms of "Gog and Magog", or Esau (of Edom) and his twin brother Jacob (of Israel). In the jewish conception, the enemies of the jew are "Esau", hence, Rome was "Esau" ("the wicked empire"). By adopting Roman principles, the West has similarly been identified by the jew as today's "Edom", which they intend to enslave and destroy and turn into Kalergi's "race of the future". In "The Time Machine", Wells thus imagines a distant future wherein the jew has achieved this "race of the future", which is the Eloi (a simple slant of "Esau"). The Eloi are a race of "the last man", who are human in shape yet have no consciousness; they are incapable of choice and merely obey. They are controlled by the Morlocks (the jew), who use mind-control to command the obedience of the Eloi. In horror, the Eloi also become the food of the Morlocks. In further despair, the result of this jewish scheme is the total debasement of all life on Earth; the destruction of creatures of choice results in the destruction of life's very preservation, so humanity descends into crab-like creatures, then perishes altogether. The Time-traveler returns in hopes that he can change things, but it seems his word has no effect, so he disappears himself. • This is further examined via "Dracula" (1897) and the vampire, with the metaphor of Dracula being the foreigner from Khazaria or ancestral jewish/gypsy lands who mimics and infiltrates the border lands of the West as a foothold before bringing with him West-destroying enslavement schemes. But, today, even those who accept the horror of Dracula are not allowed to learn its lessons with no exceptions; they grant the single exception for Dracula himself. • In "The Hobbit" (1937) and "Lord of the Rings" (1949), Tolkien speculated over how Churchill's 1920 writings on Zionism and Bolshevism could apply in an optimistic future. He presented the jews as dwarves, and he offered that indeed the West could help these "dwarves" reclaim their homeland. The cost would be an emptying of the East (the enemies of the jew), who would attack the West and the "dwarves". But, in Tolkien's optimism, these "dwarves" would aid the West by sending wealth "down the river" to their Western allies. We have seen how this narrative for a better future was abandoned by the "dwarves", who through schemes such as "sustainability" are funding the East to destroy us. They send wealth not to us but to our enemies, and they mean to stay in the Lonely Mountain while all of their enemies fight each other. There seems no contingent of "ancient Hebrew fighters" available, as Tolkien hoped. How many Stephen Millers exist for that cause? • In Orwell's "1984" (1949), he takes jewish Bolshevism to its conclusion as a warning. He lists all of the thought-terminating clichés and tactics of deception that would be used against the West, and the fate of the West is disfigured and horrible — a warning of the cost of unchecked jewish power. Yet, this book is still taught and has no impact on the left or the co-opted "Right". The left will use the same refrains of the book, such as, "The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears", yet they do this as an inversion, thus they will see what the Party wants them to see, repeat the 1984 refrain, and tell themselves that they are seeing with their own minds (see, for instance, how the left has ignored Pretti's agitations with the ICE officer). Once the left is brought to accept slave morality, they will see only in accordance with its principles. As Yuri Bezmenov later warned, this is "ideological subversion", and there is little hope in a leftist overcoming it once he has fallen to it. The same fate became of 1984's Winston, who accepts the boot. • Heinlein also devised strategies for addressing foreign subversion in the West in "Puppet Masters" (1951). The strategy was that if a foreign agent were to fully occupy all governance, it could be dislodged via its genetic dissimilarity. He was effectively designing DNA-specific bio-weapons. The problem is that a fully occupied government would *also* design such weapons against any unwilling hosts, hence today we see bio-weapons which target specific Western populations. Movies such as "No Time to Die" (2021) even show the futility of this for the White West. The literal plot of the movie is DNA-specific bio-weapons, with the world's nations rushing to gain control of them as a weapon of Mutually Assured Destruction. 007's final act is to destroy such a DNA-weapon facility, but his own DNA is contaminated, and he perishes. This is yet another metaphor of the White Westerner being given a send-off story by jewish agitprop (see also "Logan" (2017)). • Heinlein devised a re-branding of a method which sustained the early Greeks and Romans: that difficult service on behalf of the state alone would earn someone the franchise (Starship Troopers, 1959). This single concept is completely de-personned from jewish power and makes absolute ideological sense in the continuity of the West. But what was the response? The same thought-terminating clichés arrived when the left perceived on behalf of their enslavers that it threatened their power: "fascism!" This simple thought-terminating cliché has achieved monumental power under totalitarian thought reform. • In "Dune" (1965), Herbert speculates that jews could indeed enslave the world, so he uses a metaphor of a far future as a speculation for how that enslavement might be shunted in the near future. Arrakis thus takes the character of the Middle East, with the metaphor being that a White Westerner whose people are genocided might lead Arabic peoples against the armies of the jew. The problem? Billions dead. But his metaphor is that the closer that one gets to totalitarianism, the closer they get to creating their absolute antithesis as an enemy messiah. One messiah begets the messiah of his opposite (Paul Atreides faces Feyd Rautha). Thus, Villeneuve's "Dune" shows that exactly this has occurred: his rendition returns the story to its grounded reality, which is that the jew, as he has done historically (e.g., Gates of Toledo), will be the one who leads the Islamic hordes against the West. Villeneuve thus removes the metaphor for revelation, yet this simple concept has largely eluded the mainstream. • "The Matrix" (1999) adopts this same principle. The messiah of "Neo" faces the anti-messiah of "Smith". And, as the film concludes, "the problem is choice". Each individual has the choice to accept his or her enslavement. Neo too must make this choice; he must decide between being a jewish messiah or a true liberator; if he decides to be a liberator, the anti-messiah of Smith gains power in kind to defeat him (the Samson Option); Neo must overcome the Samson Option to gain leverage over the jew and offer them the same choice of survival. The purpose of the jewish simulation is to make this choice smaller and smaller so that the choice is made more and more *un*-consciously. The more *un*-conscious the choice, the more believable the jewish enslavement scheme's "goodness" becomes. The "remainder" of those who achieve a level of consciousness which brings the choice out of the un-conscious are corralled into "Zion", which is a false liberation meant to identify the conscious and destroy them. After many cycles of this reset, the idea is that 6 generations of the Right-wing have been terminated for achieving this consciousness, so by the time of the first movie in the series, the most Right-wing are what we today would call leftists (e.g.; "Switch", who is a subtle hint at a transgender female; Morpheus, who is a conscious black man; most of the occupants of Zion are themselves Kalergi's "race of the future"). The Wachowskis thus speculated something which is largely in play in today's conscious left: if the principles of the jew are totally adopted, then the slave revolt in morality — even when triggered by jewish oligarchs — can devour even these same jewish oligarchs. This has been a major project of the universities. The "Free Palestine" movement has this in mind. Their idea is to allow the jewish slave revolt while depriving it of its "rightful" masters. There have been two issues, however: one is that this same movement obeys the jewish command to destroy White people, and the second is that jewish oligarchs have seen that this iteration of the left is not accepting them as their masters and has thus already changed its funding structure. The jewish Bill Ackman is one such case. He said nothing when the universities were anti-White, but when they became anti-jew, he leveraged his wealth to intervene, continuing the slave revolt but attempting to guarantee its jewish mastery. We will thus examine additional examines of the jewish Question historically. We can be assured at this point that simply entertaining the Question does not make one a "nazi" because that itself is a thought-terminating cliché. We, as Westerners, can entertain any questions because we are free peoples. No curiosities are beyond us. We do not need to disguise this Question with metaphor when we are merely examining the Question in this Montaigne form. That obfuscation is the task of entertainment, and we see that entertainment has largely failed to penetrate with these principles. Further, the Question long-predates the "nazis", so the claim of "nazis" is historically illiterate. We can thus point out three primary ways that the jewish Question is not some kind of "anti-Semitic" or "nazi" phrase: 1) The Question predates National Socialists not just by centuries but millennia 2) The Question was debated by many nations and many peoples 3) The Question itself was part of the creation of "Israel" (i.e., jews themselves debated the jewish Question, and their final solution was the very creation of "Israel") As a clear example of this, let us look at Martin Luther. Martin Luther lived from 1483 to 1546 and discussed the jewish Question at length. Was he a "nazi"? Of course not. The National Socialist Party formed in 1920, which was 374 years after the death of Luther. As additional context, it is worth noting that Luther's successes came at a moment that most Western high schools still celebrate: the 1440 invention of the printing press. The high-school narrative is that Christianity at this time had been heavily corrupted through practices such as "indulgences", which were a way for the Church to steal wealth by forgiving sin through bribes to clergy. Via the printing press' mass-availability of materials, Luther and many others were able to self-educate and found that the actual teachings of Christ contained no mention of practices such as indulgences. He additionally found a simple truth, which is that Christ was against debt structures and debt enslavement altogether. Debt is, in fact, a heresy and is anti-Christ. This was thus a time when another infiltration of Christianity by the jew was being exposed. Past heresies include the heresy of the "Apostle Paul", who was a jew who inserted jewish debt schemes into Catholicism, but present to Luther were heresies of the Church's intentional distortion under metaphor for false practices (e.g., giving the blessings in unknown languages or languages otherwise intentionally denied the parishioners). {Note: We will separately further examine the issue of Christian slave morality and the massive failure of Christian "universalism", though we can quickly say that Christianity has indeed been an extremely problematic source of jewish infiltration and thus is *not* a long term strategy for the West; any form of universalism can be infiltrated, and most Christianity contains universalism, hence, any Christianity which accepts any jewish heresy will ultimately be undermined. Very few forms of Christianity exist without universalism. Even Lutheranism, branded after Luther himself, was a patchwork attempt to rid itself of jewish infiltration by ridding itself of universalism, but in its attempt it followed the jew's same use of master/slave morality, so it doomed itself to the same jewish destruction schemes. Hence, most practitioners of Lutheranism are today slavish weaklings. Thus, the future of the West is likely in Pagan Imperialism. Christianity offers only a short-term solution, but even that may doom the West to failure.} So we turn to Luther's 1543 work, "On the jews and their Lies". We can find this as a pdf here: http://www...media/pliki/Luther_On_Jews.pdf As an audio book this is available here: http://rum...b3-04b5-494d-b1a5-9eb8ad2e714b Let us examine some pertinent points which remain largely true to this day: • They pervert all scripture to their ends • They are immune to all reason • They embrace the sin of Pride without end • They do not think of the non-jew as even human; they believe that they alone are human (we should note that this is the jew's occult self-fulfilling prophecy from their god, Memnoch the Devil or Baal; they intend to breed a people with no consciousness so that this lie becomes true) • They claim to be "Chosen", yet this itself is a perversion; one can only be Godly through Good Works, but the jew fails to perform Good Works while maintaining that he is "Chosen"; this is anti-Christ; a people who calls itself "Chosen" by birth is only one of the Devil; in Scripture, it is outright stated that even the noblest of birth must prove his worth, and the jew largely fails at this task • They embrace all sins and vices and from their "Chosen" delusion accept these sins as their birthright (we can see this in particular through the fact that jews send their pedophiles to live in "Israel" ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=unPXNF1kND8 ) and also in that the pedophile and human-trafficker Epstein was a jewish supremacist who believed that any abuse he perpetrated upon non-jews was his right as a jew) • They reject Christ the Messiah; where he fails to accept the messiah he is of the Devil • They are blind and shameless; they do not see their evil deeds and cannot comprehend that their constant "persecution" is due to their own ungodly nature • They have been punished for their own misdeeds yet wander the world believing that they deserve reward despite continuing those same misdeeds • Whenever they are defeated by reason in examinations of their actual text, they defer to the distortions of their rabbis; the more their rabbis are pressed, the more wicked they become in their deceptions • They must be left to their wicked nature to let that nature reach its conclusion, alone and outside of all society; only in that test can they be forced to improve and repent • They attempt to deceive even God by attempting to deceive His Laws. Their rabbis distort all laws to serve their vices. (We see this remains particularly true in the practice of "Eruv", where the jew convinces himself that he can break the laws of Sabbath/Shabbat simply by dangling wires in certain areas, thus falsifying the bounds of the "home". This very practice is anti-Christ, yet it is a staple of common jewish life today.) • They call Christ a false idol who was justly killed by themselves; they hate his very name and call him "Jesu" rather than Jesus in order to play a game of Numerology which amounts to calling Jesus "155" or "nothing"/"dead"; they call the Virgin Mary a whore and a "heap of mud" (note that they do today the same game with "Hamas" in their willful mispronunciation and also with "nazis", which they made as a slur for the National Socialists) • They are overcome with avarice (another Deadly Sin); they feel that they are entitled to all the gold in the world (note that this is reflected in the character of the dwarves by Tolkien; Tolkien placed a condition on jews that they should find virtue by giving up this sin) • They have absolute enmity for Christians despite living in the good graces of the same; they resent the very arrangement and hate even those Christians who serve them (this is very true today; the dispensationalists are openly considered expendable by jews; jews simply laugh at the idea that these slaves will die the most easily in the falsified "Rapture"); they curse Christians in secret or openly when they feel emboldened by their power; they believe that their use of usury is a natural arrangement which rightly makes slaves of Christians so that the jew can relax; they enslave others with their own wealth; when others are kind to them they take it as their entitlement and the natural arrangement between master (themselves) and slave (those who reward them) (note of this last detail that this is largely true of scammer societies such as Indians) • They suspend all laws when it comes to non-jews; their laws only protect fellow jews, thus, they can commit any crimes against non-jews; they teach their children the same • They call their diaspora a state of "captivity" among lesser beings and resent the arrangement, yet they perpetually delay any "return" to "Israel"; despite being showered with goods and wealth that are not their own, they still call themselves "captive" and hate those who serve them; they know that were they the only people in "Israel" they would have no one to steal from for their endless debasement through vices (they need a host but hate their host) • Their presence among the nations is always inexplicable, since their entrance is rarely welcomed and they offer no Goodness. • They seek the final and thorough ruin of all non-jews • They largely reject all saving and conversion, and where converted they are only converted cynically so that they can subvert other religions • They howl as though wronged while wronging others • They poison the minds of the poor with their ruinous doctrines • They reject even the teachings of Moses • They lie that they are an economic benefit to the nations; when allowed into nations, they merely steal wealth from the same nations and deceive rulers with portions they gained through their theft • They spit upon Christians (this remains literally true; even Officer Tatum, a dispensationalist Christian YouTuber, went to "Israel" on one of their propaganda trips and related that he was spit upon by jews when they found he was a Christian. Of course, being very obedient, he sold this as a positive, saying that it "only" happened so many times.) • They constantly curse themselves by their own deeds • They steal in particular from those that they seek to destroy • Their messiah is an enslaver and destroyer; he is the very anti-Christ; the Christian's idea of the Second Coming by contrast is one of creation I have previously asked dispensationalist "Christians" (heretical Christians) if there are any conditions that they would place upon the jew for their allegiance. That is, I have asked if the jew can do any wrong. The dispensationalist, having accepted total enslavement, can say nothing and offers no conditions. They themselves adopt the same strategies of becoming more and more wicked if they are pressed to answer for their allegiance. But, we can see from the above list from Luther that there are indeed some core conditions which can and should be imposed upon jews as requirements within Western society. These are, after all, the Glorious Natures of our own society, and we should hold all to our own Laws. Luther himself suggests some of these at the end of his work on their lies, so I have merged many of his thoughts with my own here: • They must reject the belief that they are "Chosen"; it is an absolute certainty that any people that believes that it is "Chosen" is only chosen by the Devil. The proof of this is in the only eventuality available to such a people: they will enslave and debase the world. This is because a people that believes it can do no wrong as "Chosen" can only build a world where that becomes true. This is a world where no conditions are placed upon it and no vice is beneath it. This is the unconditional love of the Devouring Mother, who destroys in the absence of the Father's discipline and calls for improvement. Only slaves and animals can offer unconditional love to a being that has no care for any goodness to the slaves and animals. The Westerner, by opposition, loves animals; the very idea of the "Disney Princess" who is a friend to animals is foreign to the jew, but they must be brought to this virtue. • They must accept the humanity of the world; they must not believe that non-jews are cattle; they must allow the dignity of humanity to flourish • They must earn through Good Works alone; they must reject entitlements or birthrights gained through theft; they must build with their own hands; they must not accept welfare from any other peoples • Any of them who accept conversion must prove it through Works and never through stolen goods or welfare; they must work with sweat and return to the ground; "their laziness must be driven from their back" as Luther states • They must punish their sinners; they must reject the Deadly Sins rather than accept them as their birthright; avarice above all must be stopped • They must accept Christ's lessons and reject debt; they must place no one under their debt • They must never employ usury of any kind (e.g., they must never work in banking/finance, they must never manage the wealth of non-jews) • They must self-reflect; they must comprehend why their former actions brought the hatred of mankind, and they must stop performing these actions • They must hold themselves to reason and not merely distort when they are exposed • They must fight in the armed forces of any nation within which they wish to have power Are these not the Virtuous conditions of our society? Should they not be upheld by any peoples within our lands? Certainly this is so. No exceptions should be given in this respect. None at all. Those who give exception to the jews are poisoned by their worst malevolence. One of our next projects include discussion of the jewish Question in the mid 1700s by English lawmakers, particularly with regards to whether or not jews should be given citizenship in England. The discussion at the time centered around jewish character and whether or not the presumed economic benefits of their banking should be invited. There was a brief period wherein English lawmakers did indeed give jews citizenship under the belief that there would be economic benefits (the "Jew Bill of 1753"), but this was immediately stopped and reversed by public outcry less than a year later. Lawmakers thus re-examined the jewish Question and discussed many of the same exact principles that we see in Martin Luther and which we see today, namely that • the economic benefits are falsifications, since their management of wealth is through theft • their use of usury would be used to enslave Englishmen • they would use their expansion of control to erode the rights and virtues of the English and destroy Christianity • they would form societies within society wherein they would control all trade with themselves for their own benefit while excluding non-jews and even exploiting non-jews who attempted to partake in their closed systems (this refers to "Kosher" trade) These items, I should mention, are explicitly contained in 1700s British Parliamentary documents — not just secondary sources but the parliamentary archives. We can see that these same issues discussed in the 1700s are persistent today. Thus we will subsequently track how these truths were known in the 1700s in England but reversed in later times — even though there still remained public outcry. This relates to what subversions occurred in England at this time and how these subversions fueled the separation of the American colonies from the British (the short version being that England's subversion by central banking resulting in them putting more pressure on the colonies, forcing the conditions of revolution). This is a trend which permeates much of the jewish Question: jewish asset managers have a tendency to gain favor with power and force changes from the top down, eroding societies by controlling their leaders and turning those leaders against their own people to the favor of jews. We will examine this as well with Alexander Solzhenitsyn. This may be the next project, though I have not decided yet between the two (English lawmakers are certainly an easier option, though, since their debate documents are about 100 pages long whereas Solzhenitsyn exceeds 1,000 pages). As a preview, Alexander Solzhenitsyn (1918 – 2008) was a jewish refugee from the Soviet Union who famously wrote "The Gulag Archipelago" (1973). In the Gulag Archipelago, he itemizes the many tyrannical acts of the Bolsheviks and how totalitarianism expanded among the Russians. But, he saves his thoughts on the jewish Question for another work, which is titled "200 Years Together" (2002). Most sensationally, after thorough research he declares that the Bolsheviks were not Russians, and the tyrannies that Russia faced did not come from its own people. He explicitly states that it was the jewish subversion of Russian power which resulted in totalitarian expansion in Russia, and that this fact has largely remained hidden from the public because public media is "in the hands of the perpetrators" (i.e., the jewish press covered up its own crimes). I long ago (several years now) purchased and read portions of the French edition since this was an official translation, but the official English translation is not due until later this year ( http://www...els/two-hundred-years-together ). However, *un*-official English translations have circulated in pdf form. These are taken directly from the official Russian edition, but they have largely been crowd-sourced projects which often amount to bad williamthecoward-tier Google Translate uploads. So, while we await the 2026 release of the official edition, we will use the "most official" version which has been circulating and seems to have the fewest complaints from Russian–English translators. Peter Quiñones is a great source for this, and while I have listened to his discussions of the translation out of order, we will begin now at the introduction to the work.
Pillz rank	Thu Jan 29 05:44:22 Lol
williamthebastard rank	Thu Jan 29 07:17:16 Including her nazi thread, 6,912 words posted by Cherub Filth on Monday, Jan 19. Nobody with employment posts 7,000 words on a workday. Get a job, you disgusting nazi welfare queen.
	show deleted posts

Your Name:
Your Password:
Your Message: