Utopia Talk / Politics / Brown University Killings

Cherub Cow rank	Mon Dec 15 18:28:14 (Fox News clip) http://x.com/saras76/status/2000245166591115418 USA Today timeline: http://www...ts-through-monday/87772926007/ NYT says, "2 students killed and 9 injured" https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/12/13/us/brown-shooting
Cherub Cow rank	Mon Dec 15 18:28:20 Posters point out that one of the killed was VP of Brown University’s Republican Club: http://x.com/EndWokeness/status/2000395938976932191 UK Independent says the other victim was Mukhammad Aziz Umurzokov of Uzbekistan: https://ww...rzokov-ella-cook-b2884517.html Since one of the killed was a Republican, posters are suspicious that this was targeted like Charlie Kirk, Iryna Zarutska, Trump, Covenant School, and Tim Pool's home; but "9 injured" sounds like random firing into the classroom. Per Steve Sailor's law (states that high numbers of injured and few killed usually indicates a black shooter) and some bad footage of the shooter's back ( https://x.com/search?q=brown%20shooting&src=typed_query ), this is likely a black shooter. A conspiracy is that the shooter was activated by jewish crisis actors to stage pretexts for further gun grabs, which is similar to what's happening following the Bondi Beach shooting: http://x.com/MJTruthUltra/status/2000596769080570355
Paramount rank	Mon Dec 15 22:32:46 Was the shooter jewish?
murder rank	Tue Dec 16 04:55:55 A light skin negro? https://im...dedee0989f9?w=1200&h=675&f=jpg
Cherub Cow rank	Tue Dec 16 15:31:39 Oh wow, yeah. Must be a White leftist then? Does tumbletard have an alibi? This is a corrected link for the shooter's back, btw: http://x.com/C_3C_3/status/2000055847309791603
murder rank	Tue Dec 16 15:56:51 Most like scenario is a failed student. -
murder rank	Tue Dec 16 15:57:59 most likely*
Sam Adams rank	Tue Dec 16 22:41:50 A fat tranny who attends Brown matches the description of the shooter and it's internet pages are being quietly scrubbed.
Sam Adams rank	Tue Dec 16 22:52:30 Also muslim name with terrorist/far left sympathies.
tumbleweed rank	Wed Dec 17 00:13:58 looks kinda fat to be a muslim terrorist plus the crack sleuths on Twitter (including sitting congressmen) have determined this was an assassination of 1 minor insignificant Republican... & all the others shot were collateral damage... so not really muslim terrorist mo
Pillz rank	Wed Dec 17 00:20:48 You need to be institutionalized
Sam Adams rank	Wed Dec 17 01:56:10 "Brown University is mass deleting a series of celebratory articles on its website relating to Mustapha Kharbouch, a foreign born Palestinian student in its Middle East studies dept. Mustapha participated in the Hamas encampments at Brown & wrote in article declaring the need for a rebellion against the U.S. and Israel.”
tumbleweed rank	Wed Dec 17 02:31:40 (Pillz also believes it's "probable" that the insignificant Republican was the target... not crazy at all...)
Pillz rank	Wed Dec 17 03:00:14 Yeah, sure, because a fucking Palestinian woman is going to shoot up one of the most liberal universities in the United States for no reason, just to kill random people. Of course, the fact that the Republican student Association President happened to be one of those dead is, obviously, just random chance. You dumbfuck.
Forwyn rank	Wed Dec 17 05:14:51 Ludicrous to ignore the possibility of a grudge / specific desire to kill your "local nazis". Kirk tents are not a one-off; they are standard fare at large campuses. If this chick was a pretty good debater there's a high probability that a deranged troon sought out conflict and got embarrassed, and probably called a man.
Sam Adams rank	Wed Dec 17 05:41:27 The trantifa could have been attacking the econ class too. Socialists hate econ.
Sam Adams rank	Wed Dec 17 05:51:34 A random MIT professor was shot to death in his home. Same troon?
tumbleweed rank	Wed Dec 17 05:56:23 so when the motive isn't to get that one woman because she was in a republican club... as is 99.9999999% likely (if you aren't deranged), what will you say... given Kirk is the sole example you are working off of, with 0 other shootings having had that motive... & Kirk a national figure & leader of the Trumpler Youth org & whose every friend was a member of this administration (judging by his funeral/fireworks show), being vastly different from this woman nobody knows... even CC, though dumb enough to even mention the theory, still recognized it as unlikely in OP post
Sam Adams rank	Wed Dec 17 06:04:20 "with 0 other shootings having had that motive...” Wait what
tumbleweed rank	Wed Dec 17 06:40:18 what random member of a republican club has been shot ever anywhere (because they were a member of a republican club)? & with the suspect not even identified, & nobody saying the girl seemed targeted, is there sufficient evidence to believe that's the 'probable' motive here (according to Pillz), or the definite motive according to an Ohio congressman (& probably many others)? 11 people get shot at a university, & it is -so- unlikely that any of them could have a connection to Republicans, that it -has- to be the motive... (w/ 0 other instances of that occurring... afaik... Kirk not a mass shooting & extremely different in every other aspect as well)
Pillz rank	Wed Dec 17 08:30:37 What the fuck drugs are you on tw
Cherub Cow rank	Wed Dec 17 08:43:18 [tumblefag]: "an assassination of 1 minor insignificant Republican" [Pillz]: "You need to be institutionalized" [Forwyn]: "Ludicrous to ignore the possibility of a grudge / specific desire to kill your "local nazis"." Tumblefag really is legitimately insane and would have been in Arkham Asylum in a functioning society. He's claiming that this is an "insignificant Republican", which is tunnel-vision retardation. It's part of his low-IQ inability to generate a theory-of-mind for anyone outside of his early-in-the-Celebration-Parallax agitprop stream, since if someone has an IQ over 90 then they can see that psycho leftists really do operate in a specific way. And I explained this back in 2024 that political violence in 2025 would escalate to a "Troubles" format where people who want to attack "Nazis" would realize that they are economically limited from exacting political violence against national targets and would therefore just look for the highest-level local targets. This fits with Antifa's own stated practices (which Andy Ngo has catalogued) wherein psychosis leftists organize local cells and shut down any Right-wing political figures opportunistically. So as far as theory-of-mind goes: imagine you're a tumblefag type in Providence, Rhode Island. You want to have sex with or kill Trump (which is tumblefag's nature), but when would Trump visit Providence? So instead you go to the local bulletin boards or the University club listing, see the Republican leaders of the club, see their listed majors, find their classes / study groups, and do this. Reddit memes have told these psychosis types that if there is "one nazi" anywhere near you then you're "a nazi" too (i.e., so allow none to exist near you), and separate Reddit memes tell psychosis leftists that "Republicans are literally nazis" and to "punch a nazi" and to "kill baby Hitler", so the ideology is murderous by default. They're acting in accordance with their NPC programming, and they're doing it locally since "acting locally" is literally their Rules for Radicals praxis. And this has been the case with most political violence lately: - the 2017 Scalise shooter lived in Virginia in the months before the D.C. shooting - Crooks was local to the Butler rally and seized the opportunity - the Mar-a-Lago attempted killer was local to Florida - Zarutska's killer just stabbed a White woman who happened to be next to him - the Covenant shooter was a former student still in the area - Luigi Mangione was a bus ride away from where the CEO was a publicly listed and easily searched participant - Charlie Kirk's killer drove about 90 minutes - Where do we suppose the Tim Pool house-shooter lives? Virginia? Maryland? - Where will they find the Brown University shooter? Rhode Island? Massachusetts? The format of the Troubles is pure opportunism. Psychosis leftists simply wait for a threshold moment where a target of a high *enough* profile is *available* for them, then they use their available means to take action. Some retard like tumblefag during the Irish Troubles might have said some retard take like, "[I don't even know this local politician! It couldn't have been political!]" whereas, no, you fucking retard, random checkpoints were being bombed because they were down the street. Random council members were executed because someone recognized them. Fear the moment. [tumblefag]: "with 0 other shootings having had that motive" Zero? You are a liar. [tumblefaggot]: "what random member of a republican club has been shot ever anywhere (because they were a member of a republican club)?" Weak and pathetic goalpost move, you pathetic faggot. Next will you say that they specifically have to be a 19-year-old female Republican living in the Northeast to qualify as an example of a relevant shooting? Any bad things happening to you in your life are not enough. [tumblefag]: "so when the motive isn't to get that one woman because she was in a republican club... as is 99.9999999% likely (if you aren't deranged), what will you say..." [tumblefag]: "even CC, though dumb enough to even mention the theory, still recognized it as unlikely in OP post" Your percentage is as retarded as you are retarded. And it is hilarious that you think I am "dumb" for mentioning the theory, when in no comparison between us could you *ever* be anywhere near my intelligence. You are an actual fucking retard, so any insult of my intelligence by *you* is you insulting your own intelligence in the very comparison. Even when I gave you the chronological narrative of Critical Race Theory directly from a Critical Theory textbook, you *still* were too retarded to accept that the textbook's own historical narrative existed and you — to this day — stupidly believe that these definitions (from the left's own university-used textbook!) are not true. This is because as far as psychosis leftists go, you are too stupid even to know the nature of your position as a useful idiot. You are too stupid to know how fucking stupid you are. And my own evaluation of probability figured Sailor's Law was at work, but we now know that this was likely a frumpy White person. I am leaning towards a leftist who knew that his target was in that classroom and was too panicked, inexperienced, and pathetic to clearly define his target and therefore sprayed faggotly into the crowd as adrenaline took hold of him. His successful kills probably identify where he was initially aiming, in which case I would bet that this Republican woman was in the center of the kill zone and that the injured people and the other person killed were around her. This happens with inexperienced shooters because the reality of the moment takes over their small minds, and they hope that choices that they already made will guide them. Similar outcomes happened in the attempted killings by the Russian nihilists. We're talking about people who were often too pathetic to maintain self-control and butchered their own plans. Even the Kirk killer panicked in his exit plan and made a dozen mistakes after fleeing the roof. And even if this just turns out to be some random who in 2025 remarkably has zero political leanings, it is completely and 100% comprehensible why people would *reasonably* figure that the psychosis left would indeed be targeting Republicans at all levels. They have stated this as their actual goal, they have done it many times already, and they were not sufficiently punished after Kirk. They must be punished.
Cherub Cow rank	Wed Dec 17 13:19:59 Regarding collateral damage, a thought exercise for the left occured to me: Who was the target of the Butler shooting? Can we say for sure that it was Trump? After all, Corey Comperatore died and two other people were injured by gunfire. Trump was only grazed. Perhaps Crooks was aiming for Corey Comperatore and the other people were accidental? Perhaps all of the hits were accidental and he wasn't aiming for anyone at all? Obviously this is a retarded inquiry. Trump was the target, but Crooks did not care who was around Trump or behind him. He just kept shooting at his primary target. It is not definitive that this *did* happen at Brown, but the argument that [other people were hit so it couldn't have been targeted] is obviously retarded.
	show deleted posts

Your Name:
Your Password:
Your Message: