Welcome to the Utopia Forums! Register a new account
The current time is Mon Jun 02 17:39:50 2025
Utopia Talk / Politics / Biden has cancer
Rugian
Member | Sun May 18 16:41:55 . |
mexicant
Member | Sun May 18 16:47:27 Yes. |
Pillz
breaker of wtb | Sun May 18 17:17:59 2025 shaping up to be a great year |
Sam Adams
Member | Sun May 18 18:01:21 I mean biden is like 94% dead at this point so meh. |
obaminated
Member | Sun May 18 18:17:58 He was the pillar of health roughly 9 months ago. Amazing how his doctors never noticed his cancer and alzheimers until trump debated him. Its almost as if the deep state was actively promoting a puppet for its own interest. |
tumbleweed
the wanderer | Sun May 18 22:45:35 Don Jr: " What I want to know is how did Dr. Jill Biden miss stage five metastatic cancer or is this yet another coverup??? " well her doctorate is in education for starters stupid people praised Jr for posting a mature message earlier in the day, obviously he'd return to his sewer |
Pillz
breaker of wtb | Sun May 18 22:54:56 Lmao Please give him another term already |
Pillz
breaker of wtb | Sun May 18 22:56:05 I hope Trump delays his changes to daylight savings until after Biden dies, so he loses an hour. |
Cherub Cow
Member | Mon May 19 00:46:47 [obaminated]: "Its almost as if the deep state was actively promoting a puppet for its own interest." Yup. Matt Walsh pointed this out ( http://x.com/MattWalshBlog/status/1924271950089597162 ), but the retards on the left who were too fucking stupid to realize that the media lied to them about Biden's obvious cognitive decline are now going to be trusting that same liar media to give them talking points about why Biden's cancer diagnosis could not have come sooner. tumbletard is about to become an expert in cancer diagnoses just like he was somehow an expert in documents handling despite never having handled a classified document. These pathetic leftists are nothing if not mindless conformists. |
murder
Member | Mon May 19 06:08:37 "He was the pillar of health roughly 9 months ago. Amazing how his doctors never noticed his cancer and alzheimers until trump debated him. Its almost as if the deep state was actively promoting a puppet for its own interest." Sure. The deep state knew that their puppet was mentally diminished and yet scheduled him for a public debate. I'm sure that makes sense to you. - |
Cherub Cow
Member | Mon May 19 07:02:17 [murder (retarded left-wing dogma bot)]: "The deep state knew that their puppet was mentally diminished and yet scheduled him for a public debate." It does, actually, you fucking retard. When the Regime realized that Biden had not had an open press conference for *the* longest that any president had gone, they were forced to hold one — but they heavily controlled it, feeding him the names of compliant reporters to call on in order, giving him their questions in advance, and giving him pre-prepared answers. He *still* fucked it up. This was in 2021. http://x.com/CherubCow/status/1808362955035070865 They had been juicing him up on amphetamine cocktails for months, trying to get his chemistry just right enough that he could survive public spectacles. They coordinated his schedule around his sun-downing and limited his exposure to the public. Even so, they still made disasters out of even pre-filmed videos and tried to cover it with editing. http://x.com/CherubCow/status/1552309749139521536 (many hard edits in an official 2022 White House Biden speech:) http://x.com/CherubCow/status/1553361561061888000 By the time of the debates, they had extremely delayed the debate with Trump and tried to run the same "hide him in the bunker" routine that "worked" to get their puppet into the White House in the first place. But they knew that they *had* to do a debate since DNC policy was so monumentally failing. They *had* to put him up because people knew what they had been doing. They truly believed that if they put him on enough amphetamines that he could survive this one night. They made every effort that they could to create a venue that would be favorable to Biden, with mic-muting since Biden is too weak to interrupt, complicit cameramen who would control the angles of the candidates, complicit "journalists" asking questions that would favor Biden, and a complicit producer deciding how long a camera would stay on a candidate; but since Biden melted down so thoroughly during the debate they simply could not talk their way out of it. They did not have enough control of the information space to lie about it, since they had lost the Twitter propaganda apparatus. We had known this for years before that debate. We already discussed this in UP in March 2021. Only retards and liars pretended that this was unknowable. You are both categories: a retarded liar. |
mexicant
Member | Mon May 19 07:11:06 *yawn* |
Daemon
Member | Mon May 19 07:52:22 I glad that instead of Biden you now have a young and mentally healthy President. |
Cherub Cow
Member | Mon May 19 08:04:46 That's pathetic, Daemon, you anti-Christian euro-cuck. That's a comment so low-IQ that it compares to dukfag when he returns from his daily Reddit enema. The simple fact is that Trump is actually a thinking individual with no obvious medical issues that keep him from his tasks, whereas the puppet Biden literally had dementia/Parkinson's and terminal cancer. Now go back to Reddit and learn more lame jokes, faggot. |
murder
Member | Mon May 19 08:25:28 "When the Regime realized that Biden had not had an open press conference for *the* longest that any president had gone, they were forced to hold one" Forced by who? Who forced the all powerful deep state to schedule a press conference and a presidential debate? - |
Cherub Cow
Member | Mon May 19 09:09:12 [murder (literal retard; left-wing dogma bot)]: "Forced by who?" You're literally too retarded to understand these concepts, but I'll explain it for the non-retards: Even though the global totalitarian Regime has heavily infiltrated nearly ever level of government, Bolsheviks still rely on propaganda to convince the dictatorship of the proletariat to empower their oligarchs and their puppet governments. This "dictatorship of the proletariat" logic is literally written into the mechanisms of Bolshevik governance: propaganda that guides "our democracy", getting the people to do what the Bolsheviks themselves want to do. This is how the "Vanguard" justifies to itself that they represent the proletariat and are their just enslavers. By the sick logic of the oligarchs, if the people are compliant little weaklings who accepted the propaganda, then it must be that the people want to be slaves. As a useful and quick metaphor for this mechanism, the Matrix pointed this out with the Architect in terms of the unconscious "choice" that all participants in the Matrix have. Participants have to *choose* to accept the programming, and the "house" wins so long as this choice is made «en masse» (i.e., if the popular vote of the useful idiots enables it). This choice is *unconscious* most often because most people do not know the choice they are making — the choice is obfuscated through layers of deceptions. Most people, if flatly told that they are being given the "choice" to be a slave, will reject the decision and be free. This is the plainly given choice Neo makes with the red pill: he does not know every deception (yet), but when offered a plain choice he chooses not to be a slave, which precipitates his awakening. This "choice" obfuscated in the minds of the masses is achieved by propaganda. Bolsheviks "succeeded" with a total monopoly on propaganda. This is the mechanism they used in Russia to kill the kulaks and the tsars. With a propaganda *monopoly*, the choice is given to the proletariat through the thickest layers of deception possible. Under the monopoly, the people are never told upfront that they are to be slaves, but they have accepted a rhetorically deceptive framework wherein they accept a series of small contracts wherein they make a choice which enslaves them. For many leftist useful idiots, this is the choice to have their resentment discharged on their betters (the killing of kulaks and tsars), the choice to destroy everything good in the world, the choice to invert society so that their disgusting natures are elevated, etc. All of these are minor choices which they are given on their path to total enslavement, since all of these choices remove the people who oppose enslavement. Thus, the application of "force" *to* a totalitarian Regime can only happen when alternatives to propaganda exist: counter-propaganda. Because Musk purchased Twitter, the Regime no longer had a monopoly on the choice that people could make, and their layers of lies and obfuscations could be dismantled by their opposition and laid plainly for the masses. Musk acquired Twitter in October 2022, whereas the Biden/Trump debate was in June 2024. In that time, even the most sickly and psychotic left-wing echo chambers on Twitter could no longer ignore Biden's obvious mental decline because the mass-bans of the Right were losing steam. More importantly, though, the masses of the moderate left had been convinced enough by this emerging choice that they were no longer convinced or cowed by the psychosis; the dictatorship of the proletariat would, at the very least, no longer rally to the polls for Biden's win. Thus, the Regime *had* to take bigger risks with its propaganda. They did not *want* to have a debate between Biden and Trump **at all**, and the discourse had been seeded for years that the very act of a debate would be "platforming" and allowing "misinformation" to spread. But, because they did not have a monopoly on this propaganda and on these lies, they had to re-sell Biden to the masses to get them to make the "choice" of enslavement. They failed. Biden could only be given so many amphetamines before the bright lights cooked his brain. Amphetamines can only squeeze so many IQ points out of an invalid. Worse, some of the Bolshevik media itself believed their own lies because the cost of a monopoly on lies is that people within the media are afraid to speak the truth in order to cover it up. That is the cost of doublethink on the Regime apparatchik: simultaneously aware of the lie and the truth but unable to act as though the truth exists. Even now, Jake Tapeworm is running around hawking his book, trying to tell people that someone *else* was deceptive, that no one could have known, that he never had the choice. But these apparatchik had already made the choice to be slaves, they just failed to convince those in the public who had less Faith in Party than themselves. |
mexicant
Member | Mon May 19 09:10:20 *yawn* |
murder
Member | Mon May 19 20:15:10 "Even though the global totalitarian Regime has heavily infiltrated nearly ever level of government, Bolsheviks still rely on propaganda to convince the dictatorship of the proletariat to empower their oligarchs and their puppet governments." Wait, so you're telling me that it's the voters and not the deep state that have been in control all along? - |
Pillz
breaker of wtb | Mon May 19 20:22:30 Wow. The reading comprehension failure there. That's embarrassing. |
williamthebastard
Member | Mon May 19 21:29:16 Dictatorship of the proletariat is one of the most evil phrases ever created. That the people should be in charge of their country is just pure marxism. |
williamthebastard
Member | Mon May 19 21:37:08 This latest example of the neofascists' jawdropping ignorance reminds me of when GaryD proudly stated that the US doesnt have social classes, and that was an evil European thing. Apart from being utterly wrong, he was utterly clueless that he was espousing the ultimate Marxist utopia lol |
williamthebastard
Member | Mon May 19 22:05:09 I bet the poor die-hard conservative is still wondering why his book on conservatism was refused, after obliviously denying probably the absolutely most fundamental tenet of conservatism, that social classes do and must exist, and embracing, blind as a bat, the absolute ultimate goal of Marxism. |
Cherub Cow
Member | Tue May 20 03:37:18 [Pillz]: "Wow. The reading comprehension failure there. [/] That's embarrassing. Lulz yeah, murderfag is literally retarded. That's why I didn't even bother addressing it to him. His failure-to-comprehend produced a straw man that is corrected simply by reading what I already wrote XD Naturally, williamthecoward, who is even more retarded than murderfag, also failed to understand. And this is just more proof that he's a fraud: [williamthecoward]: "Dictatorship of the proletariat is one of the most evil phrases ever created. That the people should be in charge of their country is just pure marxism." Even Reddit-tier leftists who skim Wikipedia wouldn't say that the dictatorship of the proletariat is just "the people should be in charge of their country", which means that williamthecoward didn't even bother doing his usual shtick of skimming Wiki *before* shitting his diaper. All he knows are low-information useful idiot slogans such as "democracy=good thing", "dictatorship of the proletariat=good thing". And this means that he is a fraud because anyone who took even an *introductory* course on Marxism knows that a "dictatorship of the proletariat" is not just some spontaneous worker's agreement to seek self-representation. williamthecoward's definition is what a child would believe. In reality, Marxist literature is well aware that a "dictatorship of the proletariat" is *neither* an end-state of self-representation ("[our democracy hur hur]", "[worker's Utopia, hur hur]") *nor* a spontaneous "grass roots" worker's agreement. The "dictatorship of the proletariat" is *effected* by the Vanguard / intelligentsia (e.g., indoctrinated students, party propagandists, well-funded puppets) and the oligarchs directing the Vanguard. Anyone with any sense of reality and logistics could hear that alone and realize that this means an immense effort to set an ideological standard within a central oligarchy (for the Soviets, this formalized as the Central Committee), capture bureaucracies and education so that that standard is taught to the Vanguard (the march through the universities), and capture propaganda so that the Vanguard can convince the masses on behalf of the oligarchs. This is literally the central dogma of Marxist doctrine: oligarchs to Vanguard to proles (Inner and Outer Party proles). So when looking at the distinctions between Marx' Marxism, Lenin's Marxism (Leninism), Stalin's Marxism (Stalinism), Mao's Marxism (Maoism), etc., the major practical distinction is how they standardize doctrine for the masses of a particular time and nation to communicate the will of the oligarchs to the proles — but all of them address the same questions: • how is Marxism standardized so that it can infiltrate and indoctrinate within this time and this nation? • how can a Vanguard be empowered for the slave revolt but then be replaced afterwards by the oligarchs? • how can the oligarchs retain power over the enslaved proles? A critical mass of Soviets, for instance, were convinced by Bolshevik intellectuals who had seized bureaucracies, promoted the Russian nihilist movement through media capture, provoked the assassination of the tsars, provoked a slave revolt to kill the kulaks, discarded the Vanguard through executions and gulags (for Mao this was the "Down to the Countryside" movement, for the French terror, this was the liquidation of Robespierre's camp and camps that tried to fill the power vacuum), and formalized propaganda under the Party Politburo (via e.g., Glavlit, Goskomizdat). So, in case retards such as williamthecoward still do not get it: the "dictatorship of the proletariat" is absolutely *not* "people ... in charge of their country". That is the mistaken belief of the useful idiots of the Outer Party proletariat and a lie told by the Vanguard to manage the slave revolt. The useful idiot williamthecoward and tumbletard types are promised the discharge of their resentment through the genocide, imprisonment, and enslavement of their betters, but even in "success" they themselves will never see power since they are discarded once the new oligarchy achieves power. The "laptop class" of shitlibs who trusted their university professors will have to be rid of their "bourgeois sensibilities" (actual Bolshevik quotation) in the same way that Anastasia was rid of hers (murdered, raped, disfigured), the kulaks were rid of theirs (murdered, gulags, re-education), and Mao's struggle mobs were rid of theirs (murderered, imprisoned, re-education, sent to the countryside for hard labor). The "revolution" stops at the oligarchy, which maintains its perpetual power through a program of dysgenics to achieve an eternal slave caste. The "dictatorship of the proletariat" merely enables this oligarchy. TLDR: As I have said in UP many times, "our democracy" only ever means "a dictatorship of the proletariat managed by the propaganda of oligarchs". Or even more simply: in a true "democracy", the masses are cowed by groupthink which is standardized by propaganda. Even more simply still: democracies are controlled by the oligarchs who control propaganda. Left-wing anarchists and nihilists fall for this trap the most severely since they always defer to the slave mob and cannot discern the origin of "their" ideas. They are instead totally transfixed by the possibility that their resentment will have catharsis, and they simply do not care that they are being used and that they are slaves. [williamthecoward]: "GaryD proudly stated that the US doesnt have social classes, and that was an evil European thing. Apart from being utterly wrong, he was utterly clueless that he was espousing the ultimate Marxist utopia" This is another great example that williamthecoward is an absolute fraud. He skirts a similarly mistaken argument when he stupidly pretends that a dysgenic freak such as himself is genetically superior to the American — wholly unaware of the projects of eugenics and dysgenics which invalidate his delusion. It would take too long to explain in words small enough for williamthecoward to comprehend, but the rejection of British class structure in these United States is absolutely not "espousing the ultimate Marxist utopia". "Marxist Utopia" is dysgenic and enables totalitarian enslavement, whereas these United States wanted to secure uplift and liberty for themselves. George III was literally provoking slave revolts to apply dysgenics to the colonies (literally listed in the Declaration of Independence), so the thought at the time was that British class structure was failing at its job of Western «noblesse oblige». Works from the era such as Milton's Paradise Lost were examining this issue of how nobility could separate from a tyrant without themselves adopting a slave's morality. Even Jane Austen was talking about British class structure (at the time) preventing "improvement" (uplift) by not allowing nobility to re-wild. Rejecting British class structure was not "[muh Marxism]" but a rejection of Britain's own adoption of Marxist/enslavement principles. You are retarded. |
The Zero Identity
Member | Tue May 20 04:39:56 *yawn* |
Cherub Cow
Member | Tue May 20 05:33:16 "If UP's leftists could read, they'd be very upset." |
The Zero Identity
Member | Tue May 20 05:50:23 I mean it's apparent that you maga types have been angry for a long time. I mean, it has reached to levels of complete delusions. And along with your long form posting, your hopes is that something you said sticks. The reality? It's what I said the other day. Vomit. |
Nimatzo
iChihuaha | Tue May 20 05:56:31 I admire the complete lack of integrity and semblance of what is refered to as ”having a life” to whoever has created all these multis. |
williamthebastard
Member | Tue May 20 06:02:03 Ah, the Trifecta of Tragedies is complete |
The Zero Identity
Member | Tue May 20 06:02:59 Such a childish attempt to define something as to a person has no life because of any multis exist. Which has been something that has existed since the formation of this board. Based upon observance, you still have a litter of them. For one to be more vocal about it and in the same breathe be critical of it, is quite unbecoming. And lastly, really inconsequential. An argument could be made that they feel threaten of unknowns. /shrug. |
Pillz
breaker of wtb | Tue May 20 06:13:21 ..... Lol |
Pillzlovesthecock
Member | Tue May 20 06:20:18 sluuuurpppping for wtb, arent you? You wake up thinking about wtb. lol indeed. |
murder
Member | Tue May 20 06:56:39 "Lulz yeah, murderfag is literally retarded. That's why I didn't even bother addressing it to him. His failure-to-comprehend produced a straw man that is corrected simply by reading what I already wrote XD" So who is running the show, CC? Is it the deep state or is it the people? Your conspiracy theories need a little work. One minute the deep state is all powerful ... and the next they are bowing to media pressure? I thought they controlled the media? George Soros and the "International Jew" really dropped the ball here. How do they plan to replace white people if they can't even keep their own media in line? - |
Pillz
breaker of wtb | Tue May 20 07:27:47 Did you figure out how to read yet or just click clacking away? |
Nimatzo
iChihuaha | Tue May 20 07:48:32 ”Which has been something that has existed since the formation of this board. Based upon observance” Very keen observation, you are not the only retarded loser. Maybe I had you wrong man. |
Cherub Cow
Member | Tue May 20 08:06:44 [The Zero Identity]: "as to a person has no life" [The Zero Identity]: "in the same breathe" [The Zero Identity]: "be critical of it, is quite" [The Zero Identity]: "And lastly, really inconsequential." [The Zero Identity]: "that they feel threaten of unknowns." lol The absolute dumpster fire of grammar here XD I guess we're supposed to pretend that this is another Poe's Law troll where they're just *pretending* to be retarded ;D • [murderfag (retard; left-wing dogma bot)]: "One minute the deep state is all powerful" False premise. Straw man fallacy. • [murderfag (retard; left-wing dogma bot)]: "and the next they are bowing to media pressure?" False premise. Straw man fallacy. • [murderfag (retard; left-wing dogma bot)]: "can't even keep their own media in line?" False premise. Straw man fallacy. • [murderfag (retard; left-wing dogma bot)]: "So who is running the show, CC? Is it the deep state or is it the people?" Your reading comprehension needs more work. Re-read what I wrote. This is explained. What you're doing right now is the equivalent of saying, "[Hmm, Orwell, is Winston able to exercise free will by reading Goldstein's book, or is he living in a totalitarian state? Checkmate!]" You're just being retarded. Try harder. Or maybe that retarded multi can get ChatGPT to lie to him about who's ignoring arguments and shitting their diaper again? |
Fred Phelps
Member | Tue May 20 08:16:09 I'm not a multi, but for some reason this is the only website I have access to from hell. |
murder
Member | Tue May 20 08:56:13 "What you're doing right now is the equivalent of saying, "[Hmm, Orwell, is Winston able to exercise free will by reading Goldstein's book, or is he living in a totalitarian state? Checkmate!]"" You know the difference between fiction and real life, right? "Your reading comprehension needs more work. Re-read what I wrote. This is explained." No it's not explained. Your response was just a wall of gibberish. You avoid answering a simple question because answering it would blow up your tin foil beanie. Who was the deep state bowing to? The people? The media? The even deeper state? Was it the Jews? Who is running the show? - |
Pillz
breaker of wtb | Tue May 20 09:02:17 "You know the difference between fiction and real life, right?" Maybe the first lesson in our UP ESL class can be about metaphor! "Who was the deep state bowing to? The people? The media? The even deeper state? Was it the Jews? Who is running the show?" Just read it. It's not hard. Answers to your questions are in the same post they've been in for 11 hours - and they're gonna stay there. So when you finally pass my class, you can revisit that post and feel pride when you finally understand it. |
Cherub Cow
Member | Tue May 20 09:16:22 • [murderfag (retard; left-wing dogma bot)]: "You know the difference between fiction and real life, right?" I know that you don't, hence why you consistently fail to understand metaphors. Also you don't because you're retarded. • [murderfag (retard; left-wing dogma bot)]: "No it's not explained." Yes, it is explained. You're just illiterate. This is not the first time you have failed to understand simple concepts. I even threw in a pop culture reference for you even though I've done that before and, again, because you are retarded, you focused on the "fiction" rather than the metaphor. Retards such as yourself do not do well with metaphors. You're like the Down syndrome kid who gets confused when the teacher extends an index finger from each hand and puts them together to show that there are now two of something. You sit there saying, "[But you didn't add those together. They were already there.]" (You will be too retarded to understand this metaphor also.) • [murderfag (retard; left-wing dogma bot)]: "Who was the deep state bowing to? The people? The media? The even deeper state? Was it the Jews?" False premise. Straw man fallacy. Red herring. I explained all of this above. Your questions are not showing inconsistencies as you believe they are. Instead, they are showing that you failed to comprehend simple explanations. This is a you problem. (You are retarded.) One thing that might help you work through this is if you actually read what I wrote. If, after reading what I actually wrote, you want to ask a retarded question again, try quoting what I actually said to check if I did in fact say it or if you hallucinated it, retard. |
murder
Member | Tue May 20 09:33:06 "Yes, it is explained. You're just illiterate. This is not the first time you have failed to understand simple concepts. I even threw in a pop culture reference for you even though I've done that before and, again, because you are retarded, you focused on the "fiction" rather than the metaphor. Retards such as yourself do not do well with metaphors." Well then why don't you dumb things down for me respond simply so that my simple mind can understand? "False premise. Straw man fallacy. Red herring. I won't answer!" ... You will not answer a simple question because all you have in your head is convoluted bullshit that you can't defend. - |
Cherub Cow
Member | Tue May 20 09:42:40 [murderfag (retard; left-wing dogma bot)]: "You will not answer a simple question because all you have in your head is convoluted bullshit that you can't defend." No. This is simply not true. This is not like where tumblefaggot will not answer whether or not his terms for Trump applied to LOTR mean that he thinks Théoden King is an evil "dictator" for not letting orcs into Helm's Deep. I am not a slavish weakling like you are or he is. I will answer genuine questions, and I constantly answer the steel man arguments embedded even in the liarly comments of UP leftists. Your latest premise is that I'm "[not answering your questions, hur hur]", but you are glossing over the fact that your questions are fallacious. Again, this was you; these are your words: [murder]: "One minute the deep state is all powerful ... and the next they are bowing to media pressure?" This is a liarly comment from you because, again, at no point did I mention the "deep state", at no point did I claim that they are "all powerful", and at no point did I claim "they are bowing to media pressure". You lied in your question, so there is no steel man argument to which I can respond. Do you understand this? This is why I again say that you should actually quote the words that I am saying so that you know whether or not your questions are a non sequitur. So far they've been red herrings and logical fallacies. |
Pillz
breaker of wtb | Tue May 20 09:44:44 Even though the modern left claims to be for the people (proletariat), and even though institutional power has been fully captured by a global regime (tech, media, state), they still use the language of liberation to convince their followers - who should be "the dictatorship of the proletariat" - to enthusiastically support corporate oligarchs, celebrity figureheads, and technocratic puppet governments. === Listening to you repeat yourself got boring. But here, AI reads better than you do. |
murder
Member | Tue May 20 14:27:26 Lets try this again ... "When the Regime realized that Biden had not had an open press conference for *the* longest that any president had gone, they were forced to hold one" Who forced the Regime to schedule a press conference and a presidential debate? - |
Pillz
breaker of wtb | Tue May 20 14:33:19 The performance. |
The Zero Identity
Member | Tue May 20 16:20:05 CC consistently reveals a fundamental lack of comprehension, spewing out rambling diatribes that masquerade as arguments but collapse under even basic scrutiny. While, numerous assessments have rightly labeled their posts as "incoherent," and it's not hard to see why they confuse volume with substance and noise with insight. |
UP FACTCHECK
Member | Tue May 20 16:43:50 Fact Check Summary Cherub Cow’s posts revolve around four major claims: Joe Biden’s mental and physical health was intentionally concealed by media. The “Regime” (deep state/global oligarchy) controls institutions via propaganda. Twitter’s acquisition by Elon Musk disrupted this monopoly. Marxist doctrine is the root framework of modern leftist movements. -What’s Factually Grounded: Biden’s health has been a recurring topic, and cognitive concerns have been raised publicly by critics. However, no evidence supports stage-five metastatic cancer or Parkinson's. These are unverified and inflammatory accusations. The 2021 Biden press conference was his first after 64 days in office—the longest delay in recent memory. Pre-scripted questions and aides' notes were reported by mainstream sources (e.g., AP, CNN). Twitter under Elon Musk did reinstate accounts and allow more right-wing voices, changing content moderation policies and influencing the discourse narrative. - What’s Misleading or False: The “Regime” narrative—suggesting global coordination by a deep state using Bolshevik strategy—is a conspiratorial framework. It mixes real critiques of propaganda and institutional bias with ahistorical, hyperbolic interpretations of Marxism and Soviet history. The assertion that amphetamines were used to “juice” Biden for debates is unsubstantiated and medically irresponsible speculation. Mischaracterizing “dictatorship of the proletariat” as a universally applied modern model ignores the vast difference between Marxist-Leninist theory and democratic socialist or liberal governments. Using references like “slave revolt,” “gulags,” and “kulaks” to describe modern political opponents is rhetorically dishonest and dehumanizing. - Rhetorical & Analytical Breakdown - Style Cherub Cow uses: Ad hominems (“retard,” “murderfag,” “Reddit-tier,” etc.) Conspiratorial jargon (e.g., “Regime,” “Vanguard,” “slave caste,” “dysgenics”) Pseudointellectual bluster—walls of text mimicking academic tone but lacking peer-reviewed substance or discipline-specific rigor. This tactic obscures weak logic with verbosity, relying on confusion rather than clarity to persuade. -Tactics Identified Shifting definitions – Words like “democracy,” “dictatorship,” “propaganda,” and “proletariat” are redefined to fit a rigid ideological framework. False dichotomies – Implying one must choose between being a “useful idiot” or embracing the “truth” of the Regime narrative. Non-falsifiable claims – Theories about media orchestration and amphetamine usage are presented without possible disproof, making them inherently conspiratorial. Projection and gaslighting – Accuses others of “hallucinating,” “lying,” or “being retarded” when they point out inconsistencies. -Intellectual Dishonesty Repeatedly refuses to answer basic questions like “Who forced the Regime to hold a debate?” by claiming it’s a “straw man,” while simultaneously constructing elaborate alternative explanations. Overuses metaphors (e.g., The Matrix, Orwell, historical revolutions) that do not map cleanly onto real-world political structures, confusing metaphor with reality. - Conclusion Cherub Cow’s posts in this thread are a textbook example of pseudo-intellectual extremism masked as analysis. They contain: Scattered factual kernels (e.g., media scripting, social media moderation shifts), Surrounded by baseless speculation, misrepresentations of history, and aggressive rhetorical misdirection. Rather than clarifying or educating, their arguments are deliberately obfuscating, abusive, and structured to shut down dissent through intimidation and word volume. |
Pillz
breaker of wtb | Tue May 20 17:01:09 0/10 You should use tokens |
Pillz
breaker of wtb | Tue May 20 17:06:58 Your wife's son stop calling you dad yet? |
Pillz
breaker of wtb | Tue May 20 17:14:21 You talking to wtb now? |
Pillz
breaker of wtb | Tue May 20 18:23:16 You sure are |
Pillz
breaker of wtb | Tue May 20 20:59:39 Jealously is ugly. Try a coffin on instead. |
Cherub Cow
Member | Wed May 21 00:43:45 ---------- [murder]: "Lets try this again ... "When the Regime realized that Biden had not had an open press conference for *the* longest that any president had gone, they were forced to hold one" Who forced the Regime to schedule a press conference and a presidential debate?" ---------- Let's do a check here: do you truly believe that I did not already answer that question? If so, you are — as I've said before — illiterate. My comment "Mon May 19 09:09:12" directly answers this question, and Pillz' comment ("Tue May 20 09:44:44") does a pretty good summary of my comment. Are you again saying that you wish for me to further accommodate your illiteracy by restating, simplifying even further, or speaking with even fewer words? If so, I would like you to admit that your reading comprehension is very bad and that you therefore need this help from me, because without your simple act of humility, I cannot help you. No words will ever be enough for someone with your current mindset. Even more shortly: You need to understand that I did indeed answer your question and that this is a matter of you not understanding that I did indeed answer your question. Can you admit this? If not, then I cannot help you. [UP coward's multi]: "Tue May 20 16:43:50 Fact Check Summary ... Ad hominems" This is yet more proof that the left can only lobotomize A.I. to create agreement, in this case, failing to feed it enough information for it to make an informed decision. Readers may recall in the DNC Border Treason thread that I pointed out that there is a specific *reason* that I used these ad homs ("Tue May 20 05:29:43" http://uto...hread=92538&time=1747739218794 ), with that reason being based in UP's discourse format and the interactions that I've had with murdertard, williamthecoward, and duktard in various threads (and specifically the totalitarians threads). If the disingenuous user of this A.I. cannot even "train" the A.I. on a complete dataset to incorporate this basic information, then the only conclusion is that they are (again) lazily hiding behind a lobotomized A.I. in order to give a false legitimacy to an A.I. program that (ironically, being lobotomized) has already exceeded their own ability to make an honest effort. For the low-IQ multi: 1) multis/leftists insult CC 2) CC does not insult back 3) multis/leftists insult CC 4) CC begins insulting back 5) multis/leftists only input dataset "4)", lobotomizing their A.I. As a matter of basic game theory, if I allow you to continue insulting me (breaking any good faith discourse) then it is no longer in my interest to extend you a courtesy which you yourself never offer. If you dehumanize me, but I only ever treat you with total respect, then your evil is allowed asymmetry. Hence, I return your treatment while maintaining my standards by nevertheless addressing the steel man arguments buried beneath your many lies and insults. You, however, being evil, do not do even that. You insult, but never steel-man. I insult but steel-man, so I remain better than you by always offering this one olive branch. |
The Zero Identity
Member | Wed May 21 00:47:59 *yawn* |
Cherub Cow
Member | Wed May 21 01:00:43 "Yawn" says the Last Man — and he blinks. |
The Zero Identity
Member | Wed May 21 01:03:11 *yawn* |
murder
Member | Wed May 21 09:19:25 I will accept your refusal to answer as an admission that you know that you're full of shit. - |
Pillz
breaker of wtb | Wed May 21 10:56:35 You question was answered by me thought. 'the performance' You're too stupid to understand what that means, fine. But why project your stupidity onto others? All your questions have been answered (despite the answers already being present). |
Cherub Cow
Member | Thu May 22 04:02:03 [murder (retard; left-wing dogma bot)]: "I will accept your refusal to answer as an admission that you know that you're full of shit." [Pillz]: "You question was answered by me thought." Yeah, I answered though. You not reading it or comprehending it is a "you" problem. Like I said, if you want to admit that your literacy level is so low that you need it summarized even *more*, then I'll try to re-word it for your 8th grade reading level. I won't even (further) insult you if you admit that you need that help. That's how good faith works: you show it, you get it. .. If you'd like to see how "The Show" (the mass-media propagandists) are behaving towards the Biden dementia coverup and subsequent "oh also cancer" admission, it's basically what you'd think: (jewish propagandist says, "but Trump!") http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGmC3oOl59s |
obaminated
Member | Thu May 22 15:56:41 And now medical experts (even on msnbc) concede that biden likely had butt cancer his entire presidency. Gotta love it. |
Pillz
breaker of wtb | Thu May 22 16:52:45 Because it is undeniable and obvious and to continue to deny it would naturally erode the illusion, because nobody with a medical degree would accept that he developed these conditions spontaneously after the debate. |
show deleted posts |
![]() |