Welcome to the Utopia Forums! Register a new account
The current time is Fri May 09 03:39:53 2025
Utopia Talk / Politics / wowwwww
TheChildren
Member | Sun Sep 10 09:38:23 http://www.youtube.com/shorts/pHTI74teMh8 |
TheChildren
Member | Sun Sep 10 09:38:36 pwnosaurus |
Average Ameriacn
Member | Sun Sep 10 09:48:03 Just some azn fake like Sasmung does for years. Buy a real phone, buy an American phone, buy the iPhone! http://www...photos-ai-galaxy-s21-s23-ultra Samsung caught faking zoom photos of the Moon For years, Samsung “Space Zoom”-capable phones have been known for their ability to take incredibly detailed photos of the Moon. But a recent Reddit post showed in stark terms just how much computational processing the company is doing, and — given the evidence supplied — it feels like we should go ahead and say it: Samsung’s pictures of the Moon are fake. But what exactly does “fake” mean in this scenario? It’s a tricky question to answer, and one that’s going to become increasingly important and complex as computational techniques are integrated further into the photographic process. We can say for certain that our understanding of what makes a photo fake will soon change, just as it has in the past to accommodate digital cameras, Photoshop, Instagram filters, and more. But for now, let’s stick with the case of Samsung and the Moon. The test of Samsung’s phones conducted by Reddit user u/ibreakphotos was ingenious in its simplicity. They created an intentionally blurry photo of the Moon, displayed it on a computer screen, and then photographed this image using a Samsung S23 Ultra. As you can see below, the first image on the screen showed no detail at all, but the resulting picture showed a crisp and clear “photograph” of the Moon. The S23 Ultra added details that simply weren’t present before. There was no upscaling of blurry pixels and no retrieval of seemingly lost data. There was just a new Moon — a fake one. |
Paramount
Member | Sun Sep 10 10:07:09 ” But a recent Reddit post showed in stark terms just how much computational processing the company is doin” Does it matter, though? It is still a pretty picture of the moon. |
Seb
Member | Mon Sep 11 02:14:51 Paramount: Sure, but anyone can Photoshop a high Res image of the moon over the blurry shot a phone camera can take. There's what it is doing. It uses it's inbuilt sensors and image recognition to figure out it's pointing at the moon, and then superimposes a model of the moon from it's memory over the blurry white spot. |
TheChildren
Member | Mon Sep 11 03:48:48 da "blurry" whitey spot = still 500x closer and da better resolutionz that da bright shiny sunny thingie on da applez lololol owned owned owned |
Nimatzo
iChihuaha | Mon Sep 11 08:46:27 You may as well just download a picture of the moon off the internet. Skip the unnecessary image processing. |
show deleted posts |
![]() |