Welcome to the Utopia Forums! Register a new account
The current time is Fri Jul 04 06:17:39 UTC 2025

Utopia Talk / Politics / US Navy ship collides with merchant ship
tumbleweed
rank
Fri Jun 16 23:44:05 2017
The U.S. military says a Navy destroyer collided with a merchant ship off the coast of Japan and says there have been injuries.

In a brief written statement, U.S. Pacific Fleet in Hawaii said the Navy has requested assistance from the Japanese Coast Guard.

It said Friday that the USS Fitzgerald collided with a merchant ship 56 nautical miles southwest of Yokosuka, Japan. A U.S. defense official said there is flooding in three compartments of the Fitzgerald and there were injuries.

Pacific Fleet said the extent of injuries and damage to the Fitzgerald are “being determined,” and the incident is under investigation.

http://apnews.com/81421f8df91c4f60a30b7a8983bc8842

looked fairly dinged up on some CNN video

...Trump sucks
FREAK NATION
rank
Sat Jun 17 01:07:35 2017
Was Trump in the situation room?
patom
rank
Sat Jun 17 01:25:22 2017
Heads will roll on this one. Hard to imagine a destroyer not being able to see something the size of a freighter. Someone was obviously asleep at the wheel.
Aeros
rank
Sat Jun 17 01:32:50 2017
I do not want to be that ships captain right now.
Aeros
rank
Sat Jun 17 01:33:28 2017
he should do the navy a favor and shoot himself to save everyone the trouble.
tumbleweed
rank
Sat Jun 17 02:03:52 2017
the mangly damage at ~0:50
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCO1Bb4c3t4

so probably $50 billion in repairs or something
Ork
rank
Sat Jun 17 04:23:55 2017
Looks to me like the merchant ship collided with the US Navy ship and that the merchant ship is at fault.

Not that it'll save anyone involved from punishment...
Ork
rank
Sat Jun 17 04:27:58 2017
Although actually the Navy ship was hit on the starboard side so they technically should of given way. Still hard to imagine how both ships aren't at fault.
tumbleweed
rank
Sat Jun 17 04:30:44 2017
you can't trust asian drivers, it is known


OP article is updated saying 7 sailors missing, and has a decent photo of the damage
Ork
rank
Sat Jun 17 04:32:15 2017
I'll just go ahead and blame this on transgenders and Obama.
McKobb
rank
Sat Jun 17 05:12:27 2017
Its all those pleural heads.
Sam Adams
rank
Sat Jun 17 05:20:58 2017
How does an aegis ship with 8 kinds of radars and an instant on jet turbine capable of 35kt get hit by a 15kt merchantman?
McKobb
rank
Sat Jun 17 05:32:19 2017
Beware the Crystal Pyre!
Aeros
rank
Sat Jun 17 06:24:05 2017
I wonder if the joke about the warship and the lighthouse is involved here.
jergul
rank
Sat Jun 17 06:35:51 2017
Damage to the starboard as you caught in your second post. The DD sailed into a vessel sailing on a similar course, but at lower speed.

Aeros. That joke covered the US sub that unexpectedly collided with the ocean floor.

The pumps are incidentally operating at capacity. Even keel equals counterflooding. The damage is very serious.
jergul
rank
Sat Jun 17 06:40:23 2017
Also - the captain was not on watch.
Hrothgar
rank
Sat Jun 17 09:16:43 2017
Well whatever happened, no matter what the truth of it was or was not, Jergul found a way to attempt to insult the United States in response to an un-offensive post in this thread. That's refreshing and new.

Reminds me of my 12 year old when he's angry at his younger siblings. He can find a way to become even more angry at them no matter what is it they may do or not do in the following minutes.
Paramount
rank
Sat Jun 17 11:48:18 2017
Apparently, some American sailors went missing after the collision. Maybe they saw their chance to defect to Japan when their ship was so close to another ship. They simply saw a chance and jumped over to the merchant ship?
Daemon
rank
Sat Jun 17 13:09:57 2017
How such shit happens, incident from 2012:

http://pil...cb-5763-93bb-aab66d820175.html

Audio: Confusion reigned before destroyer's collision

May 23, 2013

The guided-missile destroyer Porter had just cut across the path of an approaching supertanker, a risky nighttime maneuver in one of the world's busiest shipping channels, when a sailor standing watch spotted an ominous red glow.

It was the port light of a second massive oil tanker – apparently obscured by the first merchant ship and somehow undetected or unnoticed by sailors monitoring the Porter's advanced radar system.
...
Daemon
rank
Sat Jun 17 13:12:20 2017
Also in the news:

https://ww...piloting-boats-to-shift-cargo/

...
The Nikkei Asian Review reports that a consortium of Japan's shipbuilders and freight companies are working together to build technology that will enable new ships to chart their own courses. The vision: an onboard artificial intelligence that will gather data from sensors and external sources—to ascertain, say, weather conditions and ocean traffic—in order to constantly plot the safest and most efficient route. The consortium is expected to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on the technology, which it hopes will be ready to build into ships as soon as 2025.
...
murder
rank
Sat Jun 17 16:06:35 2017

"I do not want to be that ships captain right now."

Aside from paying for the lives lost, it should only take him 500 lifetimes to pay for the damages.

murder
rank
Sat Jun 17 16:10:27 2017

"he should do the navy a favor and shoot himself to save everyone the trouble."

Quite a few people should. The Captain is obviously at fault, but any number of personnel should have spotted the threat and taken action.

This isn't an anti-ship missile or torpedo ... it's a god damn massive slow ass freighter. It's hard to imagine colliding with one if you're not trying to.

murder
rank
Sat Jun 17 16:17:56 2017

"How such shit happens, incident from 2012:"

Yeah, a bunch of people failing to do their jobs. This is ridiculous. We spend hundreds of millions of dollars providing these ships with defensive systems against every threat imaginable ... and then some moron runs a red light and gets t-boned?

murder
rank
Sat Jun 17 16:20:08 2017

The best possible defense I can come up with for the Captain is that they were forced to swerve into oncoming traffic to avoid hitting a puppy that was spotted in the path of the ship.

Everyone loves puppies.

murder
rank
Sat Jun 17 16:24:15 2017

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Vih4tGmqjs

tumbleweed
rank
Sat Jun 17 16:25:32 2017
or they were distracted by weird Japanese porn

there's no doubt you could find weird enough Japanese porn to distract anyone
murder
rank
Sat Jun 17 16:26:18 2017

"The Nikkei Asian Review reports that a consortium of Japan's shipbuilders and freight companies are working together to build technology that will enable new ships to chart their own courses. The vision: an onboard artificial intelligence that will gather data from sensors and external sources—to ascertain, say, weather conditions and ocean traffic—in order to constantly plot the safest and most efficient route. The consortium is expected to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on the technology, which it hopes will be ready to build into ships as soon as 2025."

Google will beat them to it. :o)

murder
rank
Sat Jun 17 16:28:30 2017

"or they were distracted by weird Japanese porn"

Maybe they shouldn't have ALL been rubbing one out at the same time?

Aeros
rank
Sat Jun 17 16:39:51 2017
"Also - the captain was not on watch."

Doesn't matter. He is responsible for making sure the officers and crew know what they are doing. He failed.
Paramount
rank
Sat Jun 17 16:48:14 2017
Everyone makes mistakes. Come on. Give him a brake.
Aeros
rank
Sat Jun 17 17:21:07 2017
A Captain in charge of billions of dollars of taxpayer money and a hundred lives is not allowed to make mistakes.
jergul
rank
Sat Jun 17 17:53:00 2017
Hrothgar
How do you figure? I personally have been on ships that grounded at full speed twice, and one ocean going collision. There is always an element of human error, but blameless as the root cause is systemic.

Aeros is the one that alluded to a lighthouse joke, and pretended American exceptionalism somehow made the collision a unique one time incident. Which is demonstratably not true.

Aeros
It matters. The watch officer is directly and personally responsible. He is 2nd only to god while the captain sleeps.

I would tend to go with "no fault" myself. Collisions happen. Even with a full watch crew. Which we know US naval vessels no longer have due to cost reductions and crew reductions.

For an actual stab at the US military industrial complex. Automated shit whill go to pieces without redundant human backup.
jergul
rank
Sat Jun 17 17:53:34 2017
The captain was mangled in his quarters btw. How is that for a rude awakening?
murder
rank
Sat Jun 17 20:06:14 2017

"The captain was mangled in his quarters btw."

http://bit.ly/2sEIAQr

murder
rank
Sat Jun 17 20:07:39 2017

http://bit.ly/2tz7Dk3
jergul
rank
Sat Jun 17 20:44:53 2017
If you duplicate with text, I will often delete the first redundant post murder. Just part of the full utopia forum experience.
murder
rank
Sat Jun 17 23:58:05 2017

I have no idea what you just said. :o)

jergul
rank
Sun Jun 18 00:26:15 2017
jergul
rank
Sun Jun 18 00:27:13 2017
I would have deleted that first post if the 2nd had contained "The captain was mangled in his quarters btw."
tumbleweed
rank
Sun Jun 18 05:51:39 2017
the 7 missing bodies found in flooded compartments

Trump's fake thoughts and prayers failed, impeach
Allahuakbar
rank
Sun Jun 18 11:52:02 2017
Are there simulators for the PC on how to steer a freighter?
Nimatzo
rank
Sun Jun 18 13:09:27 2017
I am always astonished by ships colliding with each other on a planet covered by 70% Oceans...
The Children
rank
Sun Jun 18 13:11:09 2017
hahaha did u see the pictures on the damage of the warship. LOL!

how does a warship collide with a big ship like that. like all those radars and human eyes culdnt see a big ship coming in from a mile away?

lol
this shit is turnin into a major news now. something very fishy went on there and they r tryin 2 cover it up!
The Children
rank
Sun Jun 18 13:14:55 2017
this is clearly drug related man. they were doing shady business when shit got sour and then they started rammin and shit.
Sam Adams
rank
Fri Jun 23 17:05:47 2017
The freighter was on autopilot, its crew apparently asleep and not any on watch.

Our destroyer, for its part, did not use its multiple radars, sonar, or its crew as observers to avoid the oncomming freighter and probably was not paying any attention at all either.

Lol. Incompetance all around.
Aeros
rank
Fri Jun 23 17:30:45 2017
Still though, as far as actual fault, it leads pretty strongly towards the freighter.

Still won't save the commanders career though. It may allow him to avoid discharge at best, and a desk job somewhere.
Sam Adams
rank
Fri Jun 23 17:47:19 2017
I have no idea who had the right of way... plenty of blame to go around tho.
Sam Adams
rank
Fri Jun 23 17:49:50 2017
If you are one of the safety inspectors you just grab your pen... violation for you! Citation for you! Violations for everyone!!!
jergul
rank
Fri Jun 23 20:00:57 2017
I actually checked the radar earlier (it was not using its combat radar arrays obviously). The DD class has an extremely powerful navigational radar.

Autopilot and no bridge lookouts (the bridge officer would have been there regardless) does not change anything.

Navigation operates on a right of way principle. You are in the wrong if the collision occurs on your right side is the general rule.
Paramount
rank
Fri Jun 23 20:18:02 2017
Big goes first. If you are a smaller ship, you make sure to stay out of the way.
murder
rank
Fri Jun 23 22:56:28 2017

I don't care who had the right of way. It's your job not to hit stuff.

show deleted posts

Your Name:
Your Password:
Your Message: