Utopia Talk - Politics - Texas teacher bangs 4 students

Welcome to the Utopia Forums! Register a new account
The current time is Fri Apr 26 19:59:53 2024

Utopia Talk / Politics / Texas teacher bangs 4 students

obaminated
Member Tue Apr 25 18:14:29
http://www...r-sex-four-high-schoolers.html

Not the best looking teacher but also not hideous, bonus points for bareback.

The Children
Member Wed Apr 26 04:39:29
well those daughters r gonna grow up just fine from this...

two more whores in the makin

zavyx
Member Wed Apr 26 05:48:59
when are people going to understand - the average boy is horniest when he's 15, and the average woman is horniest in her mid 30s to mid 40s.

So what the hell is wrong with that? They all wanted sex, no body forced anybody to do anything they didn't want to do.

"Land of the Free" my big fat ass - no freedom to fuck when your god given hormones are telling you "FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK, then FUCK some more!!!"

Paramount
Member Wed Apr 26 06:11:17
Did she get pregnant?

Paramount
Member Wed Apr 26 06:25:23
"Former kindergarten teacher and mother-of-two, 38, 'had group sex with high school students after sexting with them on Snapchat'"

So this is what people do today. They spend all their time on Snapchat trying to get laid. That's why people don't know how to boil an egg or change a lightbulb.

murder
Member Wed Apr 26 22:27:25

I love how they keep emphasizing that she used to teach kindergarten.

murder
Member Wed Apr 26 22:30:12

"when are people going to understand - the average boy is horniest when he's 15, and the average woman is horniest in her mid 30s to mid 40s."

^ this

"So what the hell is wrong with that?"

^ and this

hood
Member Thu Apr 27 09:20:52
Is mt advocating for rape again?

My my.

murder
Member Thu Apr 27 09:52:26

Who got raped?

hood
Member Thu Apr 27 10:03:03
According to the article, 4 under age high school students.

zavyx
Member Thu Apr 27 12:18:42
oh yea, horny teen boys banging a hot young mumma is 'rape' but setting gooks on fire with a flame thrower is enforcing democracy around the world.

You americans are so fucked up, and your poloticians are either too stupid to see it, or too fucking dumb to fix it.

obaminated
Member Thu Apr 27 13:25:11
Hood likes to follow the letter of the law, except when it comes to illegal immigration.

Im better then you
2012 UP Football Champ Thu Apr 27 13:26:35
You can see the rapist with her victim who has a smile so big you can see it though the blur.

murder
Member Thu Apr 27 13:53:37

"According to the article, 4 under age high school students."

Were you ever a teenage boy?

hood
Member Thu Apr 27 14:37:47
"Hood likes to follow the letter of the law, except when it comes to illegal immigration."

No, only consistency. If you switched genders, that is a male teacher with female students, people would be disgusted. If that scenario is horrible, so is the one depicted in this article.

I'm completely fine with lowering the age of consent (to a reasonable age...) with some constraints to more easily identify an abuse of power by the older party. However, glorifying a female fucking underage boys but condemning a male is hypocritical bullshit. Either both are ok or neither are.

obaminated
Member Thu Apr 27 14:48:05
And once again, a boy isn't a girl, although after your bizarre difference of that idiotic tranny music video it's not surprising that you refuse to admit that.

obaminated
Member Thu Apr 27 15:01:37
Bizarre defence*

Nekran
Member Fri Apr 28 00:23:48
A boy isn't the same as a girl, but the law should apply to both in the same way. Agreed?

Asgard
Member Fri Apr 28 07:16:04
The law should not be so black and white.

hood
Member Fri Apr 28 07:40:42
"although after your bizarre difference of that idiotic tranny music video"

I didn't defend the video. Video is awful. I only defended people's right to be who they are without inbred tards unnecessarily judging them.

"a boy isn't a girl"

So this means rape isn't rape? How about the fact that women mature both physically and mentally earlier than men? If anything, this should mean we treat these situations the exact opposite of what we do now, as teenage women are more likely to be able to handle what they're getting into.

Biology, genetics, right?

murder
Member Fri Apr 28 07:43:06

"If you switched genders ..."

You be transgendered.

"A boy isn't the same as a girl, but the law should apply to both in the same way. Agreed?"

The protection of the law should apply the same. But since no one was harmed, there is no place for the law in private lives.

murder
Member Fri Apr 28 07:52:36

"However, glorifying a female fucking underage boys but condemning a male is hypocritical bullshit. Either both are ok or neither are."

The teacher isn't being glorified. We're simply acknowledging that this is the greatest thing to ever happen in the lives of those boys.

You worry about "hypocrisy", I'll worry about incarcerating people who haven't harmed anyone.

Nekran
Member Fri Apr 28 08:36:26
So you would be OK with it if it was 4 teenage girls who were into it with a male teacher just the same, then?

It's all about society drawing a limit (which is always a problem with anything) for when we consider adolescents to be old enough to make certain decisions.

In here we can drink at 16yo, out there only at 21yo. But then you can drive a car there at 16yo and here only at 18yo. There's cultural and practical reasons for those differences.

Sexual consent is just another one of those limits that needs to be set, as difficult as that is. You set a limit that you think is senseful for your population. But then you do have to stick with it... Either you consider a 15yo mature enough to make a certain decision, or you don't.

hood
Member Fri Apr 28 09:27:10
"You be transgendered."

You're a moron.

"since no one was harmed"

A grown woman abused her position of power over 4 underage kids. That's pretty clear harm.

"We're simply acknowledging that this is the greatest thing to ever happen in the lives of those boys."

What, getting to fuck a borderline ugly teacher as opposed to girls their age? There are likely scores of girls at their school better looking than this teacher.

"You worry about "hypocrisy", I'll worry about incarcerating people who haven't harmed anyone."

Plenty of harm this teacher has likely stunted the growth of 4 kids.

murder
Member Fri Apr 28 16:47:14

"So you would be OK with it if it was 4 teenage girls who were into it with a male teacher just the same, then?"

I don't know. I haven't read about that case yet.

"It's all about society drawing a limit (which is always a problem with anything) for when we consider adolescents to be old enough to make certain decisions."

That's fine. But those rules exist to punish exploitation. I seriously doubt that any of those boys feel victimized.

>>> "That government is best which governs least" <<<

Enforcing rules just for the sake of enforcing rules just makes you a dick.

Nekran
Member Fri Apr 28 16:53:29
"I don't know. I haven't read about that case yet."

And you lack the ability to consider a simple and very realistic hypothetical?

"Enforcing rules just for the sake of enforcing rules just makes you a dick."

You really think there is no chance that this was a negative experience for these kids that they felt forced into?

murder
Member Fri Apr 28 16:56:53

"A grown woman abused her position of power over 4 underage kids. That's pretty clear harm."

How will those boys ever recover?

"What, getting to fuck a borderline ugly teacher as opposed to girls their age?"

If you need the difference explained to you, you probably wouldn't understand anyway.

"There are likely scores of girls at their school better looking than this teacher."

I guarantee it. But most of those girls aren't putting out, and it's not as if you have to choose one or the other.

I ask again, were you ever a teenage boy? You cannot seriously tell me that a good portion of your time wasn't spent imagining ridiculous scenarios which would result in seducing/being seduced by some teacher ... as well as any number of other adult women.

Short of being asexual, it's unavoidable.

At that age boys are looking to put it in anything. A grown woman is just one of the more preferable options.

murder
Member Fri Apr 28 16:58:34

"And you lack the ability to consider a simple and very realistic hypothetical?"

I can consider any hypothetical you like, and give you a reasoned response. That response may or may not survive contact with the air.

murder
Member Fri Apr 28 17:02:18

"You really think there is no chance that this was a negative experience for these kids that they felt forced into?"

Well, they may sprain their wrists from high-fiving every other boy in school.

Forced into it? lol :o)

Nekran
Member Fri Apr 28 17:03:52
Any child fantasizes about eating tons of candy.

However forcefeeding a child a ton of candy is not OK.

murder
Member Fri Apr 28 17:07:01

Can we at least agree that the friend that volunteered to come along isn't a "victim"?

murder
Member Fri Apr 28 17:09:33

"Any child fantasizes about eating tons of candy."

And when they do, we call them gluttons, not victims.

"However forcefeeding a child a ton of candy is not OK."

You notice that you presume that they were forced. Would you have needed to be forced?

Nekran
Member Fri Apr 28 17:09:41
Yeah... forced into it both by the woman having a position of authority as by the retarded prevalent "cool male" attitude of their peers you display here.

And even within your juvenile attitude (which most people shed after their teenage years, what with their brains fully developing and all that), that teacher isn't anything close to hot and would not have gotten many high fives in my highschool... even as horny teenagers we did have some standards.

Nekran
Member Fri Apr 28 17:13:04
"Would you have needed to be forced?"

yes. I would stop eating candy after some time. And as I just stated, that teacher seriously isn't hot.

But yeah, maybe at that age I would've felt like I should fuck her, just because the opportunity presented itself and I could try to make it look cool that I fucked a teacher to other teenage idiots.

I doubt it would have been good for me in the long run though. Your adult mind seriously can't grasp this idea?

murder
Member Fri Apr 28 20:31:20

"Yeah... forced into it both by the woman having a position of authority as by the retarded prevalent "cool male" attitude of their peers you display here."

So basically he's a victim because you say so.

"And even within your juvenile attitude (which most people shed after their teenage years, what with their brains fully developing and all that)"

I'm not sheeple. I couldn't care less what most people do.

"that teacher isn't anything close to hot and would not have gotten many high fives in my highschool... even as horny teenagers we did have some standards."

I'm sure you were all young Brad Pitts nailing a string of perfect "10" college freshmen. Either that or horny virgins pretending that you weren't getting laid because you had standards.

Nekran
Member Fri Apr 28 20:33:11
"I'm sure you were all young Brad Pitts nailing a string of perfect "10" college freshmen. Either that or horny virgins pretending that you weren't getting laid because you had standards."

Yeah... those are the only 2 options. When you're a teen and not scoring perfect 10's, you just start fucking dogs...

You must've had some fucked up teenage years...

Nekran
Member Fri Apr 28 20:34:03
"So basically he's a victim because you say so."

I'm saying they possibly are victims, yes.

It's you who's saying they are definitely not victims because you say so and all teenage boys are exactly the same.

Retard.

murder
Member Fri Apr 28 20:41:52

"But yeah, maybe at that age I would've felt like I should fuck her, just because the opportunity presented itself and I could try to make it look cool that I fucked a teacher to other teenage idiots."

But certainly not to get off and experience sex with a mature woman.

"I doubt it would have been good for me in the long run though. Your adult mind seriously can't grasp this idea?"

The only damage resulting from this will be adults trying to convince the kids that they've been victimized and should feel bad about what they did.

And just for the record, would sex with a girl their own age have been equally as damaging to these boys?

murder
Member Fri Apr 28 20:43:19

"It's you who's saying they are definitely not victims because you say so and all teenage boys are exactly the same."

That and biology. But wtf does nature know anyway?

Nekran
Member Fri Apr 28 20:53:28
"But certainly not to get off and experience sex with a mature woman."

With a mature authority figure I find unattractive? Yeah, no.

"And just for the record, would sex with a girl their own age have been equally as damaging to these boys?"

Way less likely. But if they felt forced into it by peer-pressure or whatever, sure, it could possibly be a bad experience that has ramifications on their future relationships. Just nothing illegal would have occurred. We expect adults to know better though.

Say you were single and a mature-looking 15yo you think is hot wanted to fuck you and you were aware of her age? Even if you knew you wouldn't get in trouble for it... would you?

I wouldn't. Because it's all sorts of fucked up. I do not want to fuck a child, even if it looks like Scarlett Johansson.

Nekran
Member Fri Apr 28 20:59:51
"That and biology. But wtf does nature know anyway?"

Lol... yes... biology says all teenage boys are exactly the same... Something tells me you are not a man of science?

So do you think all rape that could result into pregnancy is OK, because it is an evolutionary sensible thing to do as well?

Or do you make a special case for this scenario because you were so desperate for sex as a teenager, you can not fathom that anyone else out of 7 billion humans might be different?

Hood
Member Fri Apr 28 21:01:34
"That and biology. But wtf does nature know anyway?"

Biology gave us the appendix and tonsils. Nature is not infallible and simply citing biology is an incredibly lazy and disingenuous argument.

murder
Member Fri Apr 28 21:14:06

"Way less likely."

Why? Less wear on the vagina?

"But if they felt forced into it by peer-pressure or whatever ..."

Peer pressure doesn't force you to anything. Ever. That is only slightly less stupid than claiming that the devil made you do it.

"... sure, it could possibly be a bad experience that has ramifications on their future relationships. Just nothing illegal would have occurred. We expect adults to know better though."

I keep trying to figure out exactly what you think the problem is, but you can't seem to make up your mind what the problem is.

1. It's hypocrisy because I would treat girl students and/or male teachers differently.
2. The law is arbitrary, but it's the law, and we have to hold the line.
3. Rape.
4. If the kids did have consensual sex with their teacher, it still wasn't consensual because they can't consent, or because she is in a position of power over them, or because they'd only do it to impress their friends and therefore peer pressure!

I also have to admit confusion at your insistence that all teenage boys aren't the same ... while insisting on treating boys and girls the same ... because you know, while all teenage boys are the same, they are the same as girls.

Or something like that.

murder
Member Fri Apr 28 21:20:21

"Or do you make a special case for this scenario because ..."

I make special cases for all scenarios, unless I don't feel the need to.

murder
Member Fri Apr 28 21:22:37

"Biology gave us the appendix and tonsils. Nature is not infallible and simply citing biology is an incredibly lazy and disingenuous argument."

Not when it comes to boners. The law of boners is incontrovertible.

Nekran
Member Sat Apr 29 03:10:19
"I also have to admit confusion at your insistence that all teenage boys aren't the same ... while insisting on treating boys and girls the same ... because you know, while all teenage boys are the same, they are the same as girls."

I never claimed they were the same as girls. I have claimed the law should apply equally to both sexes. Is that really that hard to grasp?

"1. It's hypocrisy because I would treat girl students and/or male teachers differently."

This is not the problem with this situation, it is a problem that you specifically have. You seem to think a female sexually assaulting a male is completely impossible, no matter positions of power, age or consent given. I (and luckily the law as well) very much disagree.

"2. The law is arbitrary, but it's the law, and we have to hold the line."

I wouldn't call it arbitrary, but it is impossible to perfect. I just recognise that a society has to make decisions drawing lines and that this will inevitably lead to fucked up situations. Judges will then have to study the specific cases and well, judge.

"3. Rape."

I do indeed consider rape a problem, unlike you, apparently. According to the law, this is what happened here. Considering it was female on adolescent boys, you are of the opinion that rape is impossible to have occurred. I disagree once more and think this case should be looked into.

"4. If the kids did have consensual sex with their teacher, it still wasn't consensual because they can't consent, or because she is in a position of power over them, or because they'd only do it to impress their friends and therefore peer pressure!"

Indeed, as a society you have deemed that they are unfit to consent at their age. The rest of it is just me trying to explain possible ways in which they could have felt forced into it to you, a male who seems to think it is impossible for teenage boys to be sexually abused by a female.

"Not when it comes to boners. The law of boners is incontrovertible."

Yeah, that still doesn't mean anything. It's just more macho talk bullshit. Guys just want to fuck anything and everything, yo! All 3,5 billion of us! Nobody thinks differently than I do! If you can get a boner in a situation, you consent!

Average European
Member Mon May 08 03:18:35
Sooo, the president-elect of France is someone who was groomed at the age of 15 by his then 39yo teacher (against parents wishes), to the extent that he became a cuck and married her. He was robbed of any chance of having a normal relationship. He's stuck with a melted-looking wax figurine with dentures. But hey, it's all worth it because he got Le Peepee wet way back when.

zavyx
Member Mon May 08 11:14:28
boys and girls aren't the same at all - 15 year old boys are horny morning, noon and night. 15 year old girls only get horny 48 hours before they start bleeding.

of course 15 year old boys should be able to bang 35 year old women - but 35 year old men should not be banging 15 year old girls, unless he's happy to get blood on his cock.

show deleted posts

obaminated Member	Tue Apr 25 18:14:29 http://www...r-sex-four-high-schoolers.html Not the best looking teacher but also not hideous, bonus points for bareback.
The Children Member	Wed Apr 26 04:39:29 well those daughters r gonna grow up just fine from this... two more whores in the makin
zavyx Member	Wed Apr 26 05:48:59 when are people going to understand - the average boy is horniest when he's 15, and the average woman is horniest in her mid 30s to mid 40s. So what the hell is wrong with that? They all wanted sex, no body forced anybody to do anything they didn't want to do. "Land of the Free" my big fat ass - no freedom to fuck when your god given hormones are telling you "FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK, then FUCK some more!!!"
Paramount Member	Wed Apr 26 06:11:17 Did she get pregnant?
Paramount Member	Wed Apr 26 06:25:23 "Former kindergarten teacher and mother-of-two, 38, 'had group sex with high school students after sexting with them on Snapchat'" So this is what people do today. They spend all their time on Snapchat trying to get laid. That's why people don't know how to boil an egg or change a lightbulb.
murder Member	Wed Apr 26 22:27:25 I love how they keep emphasizing that she used to teach kindergarten.
murder Member	Wed Apr 26 22:30:12 "when are people going to understand - the average boy is horniest when he's 15, and the average woman is horniest in her mid 30s to mid 40s." ^ this "So what the hell is wrong with that?" ^ and this
hood Member	Thu Apr 27 09:20:52 Is mt advocating for rape again? My my.
murder Member	Thu Apr 27 09:52:26 Who got raped?
hood Member	Thu Apr 27 10:03:03 According to the article, 4 under age high school students.
zavyx Member	Thu Apr 27 12:18:42 oh yea, horny teen boys banging a hot young mumma is 'rape' but setting gooks on fire with a flame thrower is enforcing democracy around the world. You americans are so fucked up, and your poloticians are either too stupid to see it, or too fucking dumb to fix it.
obaminated Member	Thu Apr 27 13:25:11 Hood likes to follow the letter of the law, except when it comes to illegal immigration.
Im better then you 2012 UP Football Champ	Thu Apr 27 13:26:35 You can see the rapist with her victim who has a smile so big you can see it though the blur.
murder Member	Thu Apr 27 13:53:37 "According to the article, 4 under age high school students." Were you ever a teenage boy?
hood Member	Thu Apr 27 14:37:47 "Hood likes to follow the letter of the law, except when it comes to illegal immigration." No, only consistency. If you switched genders, that is a male teacher with female students, people would be disgusted. If that scenario is horrible, so is the one depicted in this article. I'm completely fine with lowering the age of consent (to a reasonable age...) with some constraints to more easily identify an abuse of power by the older party. However, glorifying a female fucking underage boys but condemning a male is hypocritical bullshit. Either both are ok or neither are.
obaminated Member	Thu Apr 27 14:48:05 And once again, a boy isn't a girl, although after your bizarre difference of that idiotic tranny music video it's not surprising that you refuse to admit that.
obaminated Member	Thu Apr 27 15:01:37 Bizarre defence*
Nekran Member	Fri Apr 28 00:23:48 A boy isn't the same as a girl, but the law should apply to both in the same way. Agreed?
Asgard Member	Fri Apr 28 07:16:04 The law should not be so black and white.
hood Member	Fri Apr 28 07:40:42 "although after your bizarre difference of that idiotic tranny music video" I didn't defend the video. Video is awful. I only defended people's right to be who they are without inbred tards unnecessarily judging them. "a boy isn't a girl" So this means rape isn't rape? How about the fact that women mature both physically and mentally earlier than men? If anything, this should mean we treat these situations the exact opposite of what we do now, as teenage women are more likely to be able to handle what they're getting into. Biology, genetics, right?
murder Member	Fri Apr 28 07:43:06 "If you switched genders ..." You be transgendered. "A boy isn't the same as a girl, but the law should apply to both in the same way. Agreed?" The protection of the law should apply the same. But since no one was harmed, there is no place for the law in private lives.
murder Member	Fri Apr 28 07:52:36 "However, glorifying a female fucking underage boys but condemning a male is hypocritical bullshit. Either both are ok or neither are." The teacher isn't being glorified. We're simply acknowledging that this is the greatest thing to ever happen in the lives of those boys. You worry about "hypocrisy", I'll worry about incarcerating people who haven't harmed anyone.
Nekran Member	Fri Apr 28 08:36:26 So you would be OK with it if it was 4 teenage girls who were into it with a male teacher just the same, then? It's all about society drawing a limit (which is always a problem with anything) for when we consider adolescents to be old enough to make certain decisions. In here we can drink at 16yo, out there only at 21yo. But then you can drive a car there at 16yo and here only at 18yo. There's cultural and practical reasons for those differences. Sexual consent is just another one of those limits that needs to be set, as difficult as that is. You set a limit that you think is senseful for your population. But then you do have to stick with it... Either you consider a 15yo mature enough to make a certain decision, or you don't.
hood Member	Fri Apr 28 09:27:10 "You be transgendered." You're a moron. "since no one was harmed" A grown woman abused her position of power over 4 underage kids. That's pretty clear harm. "We're simply acknowledging that this is the greatest thing to ever happen in the lives of those boys." What, getting to fuck a borderline ugly teacher as opposed to girls their age? There are likely scores of girls at their school better looking than this teacher. "You worry about "hypocrisy", I'll worry about incarcerating people who haven't harmed anyone." Plenty of harm this teacher has likely stunted the growth of 4 kids.
murder Member	Fri Apr 28 16:47:14 "So you would be OK with it if it was 4 teenage girls who were into it with a male teacher just the same, then?" I don't know. I haven't read about that case yet. "It's all about society drawing a limit (which is always a problem with anything) for when we consider adolescents to be old enough to make certain decisions." That's fine. But those rules exist to punish exploitation. I seriously doubt that any of those boys feel victimized. >>> "That government is best which governs least" <<< Enforcing rules just for the sake of enforcing rules just makes you a dick.
Nekran Member	Fri Apr 28 16:53:29 "I don't know. I haven't read about that case yet." And you lack the ability to consider a simple and very realistic hypothetical? "Enforcing rules just for the sake of enforcing rules just makes you a dick." You really think there is no chance that this was a negative experience for these kids that they felt forced into?
murder Member	Fri Apr 28 16:56:53 "A grown woman abused her position of power over 4 underage kids. That's pretty clear harm." How will those boys ever recover? "What, getting to fuck a borderline ugly teacher as opposed to girls their age?" If you need the difference explained to you, you probably wouldn't understand anyway. "There are likely scores of girls at their school better looking than this teacher." I guarantee it. But most of those girls aren't putting out, and it's not as if you have to choose one or the other. I ask again, were you ever a teenage boy? You cannot seriously tell me that a good portion of your time wasn't spent imagining ridiculous scenarios which would result in seducing/being seduced by some teacher ... as well as any number of other adult women. Short of being asexual, it's unavoidable. At that age boys are looking to put it in anything. A grown woman is just one of the more preferable options.
murder Member	Fri Apr 28 16:58:34 "And you lack the ability to consider a simple and very realistic hypothetical?" I can consider any hypothetical you like, and give you a reasoned response. That response may or may not survive contact with the air.
murder Member	Fri Apr 28 17:02:18 "You really think there is no chance that this was a negative experience for these kids that they felt forced into?" Well, they may sprain their wrists from high-fiving every other boy in school. Forced into it? lol :o)
Nekran Member	Fri Apr 28 17:03:52 Any child fantasizes about eating tons of candy. However forcefeeding a child a ton of candy is not OK.
murder Member	Fri Apr 28 17:07:01 Can we at least agree that the friend that volunteered to come along isn't a "victim"?
murder Member	Fri Apr 28 17:09:33 "Any child fantasizes about eating tons of candy." And when they do, we call them gluttons, not victims. "However forcefeeding a child a ton of candy is not OK." You notice that you presume that they were forced. Would you have needed to be forced?
Nekran Member	Fri Apr 28 17:09:41 Yeah... forced into it both by the woman having a position of authority as by the retarded prevalent "cool male" attitude of their peers you display here. And even within your juvenile attitude (which most people shed after their teenage years, what with their brains fully developing and all that), that teacher isn't anything close to hot and would not have gotten many high fives in my highschool... even as horny teenagers we did have some standards.
Nekran Member	Fri Apr 28 17:13:04 "Would you have needed to be forced?" yes. I would stop eating candy after some time. And as I just stated, that teacher seriously isn't hot. But yeah, maybe at that age I would've felt like I should fuck her, just because the opportunity presented itself and I could try to make it look cool that I fucked a teacher to other teenage idiots. I doubt it would have been good for me in the long run though. Your adult mind seriously can't grasp this idea?
murder Member	Fri Apr 28 20:31:20 "Yeah... forced into it both by the woman having a position of authority as by the retarded prevalent "cool male" attitude of their peers you display here." So basically he's a victim because you say so. "And even within your juvenile attitude (which most people shed after their teenage years, what with their brains fully developing and all that)" I'm not sheeple. I couldn't care less what most people do. "that teacher isn't anything close to hot and would not have gotten many high fives in my highschool... even as horny teenagers we did have some standards." I'm sure you were all young Brad Pitts nailing a string of perfect "10" college freshmen. Either that or horny virgins pretending that you weren't getting laid because you had standards.
Nekran Member	Fri Apr 28 20:33:11 "I'm sure you were all young Brad Pitts nailing a string of perfect "10" college freshmen. Either that or horny virgins pretending that you weren't getting laid because you had standards." Yeah... those are the only 2 options. When you're a teen and not scoring perfect 10's, you just start fucking dogs... You must've had some fucked up teenage years...
Nekran Member	Fri Apr 28 20:34:03 "So basically he's a victim because you say so." I'm saying they possibly are victims, yes. It's you who's saying they are definitely not victims because you say so and all teenage boys are exactly the same. Retard.
murder Member	Fri Apr 28 20:41:52 "But yeah, maybe at that age I would've felt like I should fuck her, just because the opportunity presented itself and I could try to make it look cool that I fucked a teacher to other teenage idiots." But certainly not to get off and experience sex with a mature woman. "I doubt it would have been good for me in the long run though. Your adult mind seriously can't grasp this idea?" The only damage resulting from this will be adults trying to convince the kids that they've been victimized and should feel bad about what they did. And just for the record, would sex with a girl their own age have been equally as damaging to these boys?
murder Member	Fri Apr 28 20:43:19 "It's you who's saying they are definitely not victims because you say so and all teenage boys are exactly the same." That and biology. But wtf does nature know anyway?
Nekran Member	Fri Apr 28 20:53:28 "But certainly not to get off and experience sex with a mature woman." With a mature authority figure I find unattractive? Yeah, no. "And just for the record, would sex with a girl their own age have been equally as damaging to these boys?" Way less likely. But if they felt forced into it by peer-pressure or whatever, sure, it could possibly be a bad experience that has ramifications on their future relationships. Just nothing illegal would have occurred. We expect adults to know better though. Say you were single and a mature-looking 15yo you think is hot wanted to fuck you and you were aware of her age? Even if you knew you wouldn't get in trouble for it... would you? I wouldn't. Because it's all sorts of fucked up. I do not want to fuck a child, even if it looks like Scarlett Johansson.
Nekran Member	Fri Apr 28 20:59:51 "That and biology. But wtf does nature know anyway?" Lol... yes... biology says all teenage boys are exactly the same... Something tells me you are not a man of science? So do you think all rape that could result into pregnancy is OK, because it is an evolutionary sensible thing to do as well? Or do you make a special case for this scenario because you were so desperate for sex as a teenager, you can not fathom that anyone else out of 7 billion humans might be different?
Hood Member	Fri Apr 28 21:01:34 "That and biology. But wtf does nature know anyway?" Biology gave us the appendix and tonsils. Nature is not infallible and simply citing biology is an incredibly lazy and disingenuous argument.
murder Member	Fri Apr 28 21:14:06 "Way less likely." Why? Less wear on the vagina? "But if they felt forced into it by peer-pressure or whatever ..." Peer pressure doesn't force you to anything. Ever. That is only slightly less stupid than claiming that the devil made you do it. "... sure, it could possibly be a bad experience that has ramifications on their future relationships. Just nothing illegal would have occurred. We expect adults to know better though." I keep trying to figure out exactly what you think the problem is, but you can't seem to make up your mind what the problem is. 1. It's hypocrisy because I would treat girl students and/or male teachers differently. 2. The law is arbitrary, but it's the law, and we have to hold the line. 3. Rape. 4. If the kids did have consensual sex with their teacher, it still wasn't consensual because they can't consent, or because she is in a position of power over them, or because they'd only do it to impress their friends and therefore peer pressure! I also have to admit confusion at your insistence that all teenage boys aren't the same ... while insisting on treating boys and girls the same ... because you know, while all teenage boys are the same, they are the same as girls. Or something like that.
murder Member	Fri Apr 28 21:20:21 "Or do you make a special case for this scenario because ..." I make special cases for all scenarios, unless I don't feel the need to.
murder Member	Fri Apr 28 21:22:37 "Biology gave us the appendix and tonsils. Nature is not infallible and simply citing biology is an incredibly lazy and disingenuous argument." Not when it comes to boners. The law of boners is incontrovertible.
Nekran Member	Sat Apr 29 03:10:19 "I also have to admit confusion at your insistence that all teenage boys aren't the same ... while insisting on treating boys and girls the same ... because you know, while all teenage boys are the same, they are the same as girls." I never claimed they were the same as girls. I have claimed the law should apply equally to both sexes. Is that really that hard to grasp? "1. It's hypocrisy because I would treat girl students and/or male teachers differently." This is not the problem with this situation, it is a problem that you specifically have. You seem to think a female sexually assaulting a male is completely impossible, no matter positions of power, age or consent given. I (and luckily the law as well) very much disagree. "2. The law is arbitrary, but it's the law, and we have to hold the line." I wouldn't call it arbitrary, but it is impossible to perfect. I just recognise that a society has to make decisions drawing lines and that this will inevitably lead to fucked up situations. Judges will then have to study the specific cases and well, judge. "3. Rape." I do indeed consider rape a problem, unlike you, apparently. According to the law, this is what happened here. Considering it was female on adolescent boys, you are of the opinion that rape is impossible to have occurred. I disagree once more and think this case should be looked into. "4. If the kids did have consensual sex with their teacher, it still wasn't consensual because they can't consent, or because she is in a position of power over them, or because they'd only do it to impress their friends and therefore peer pressure!" Indeed, as a society you have deemed that they are unfit to consent at their age. The rest of it is just me trying to explain possible ways in which they could have felt forced into it to you, a male who seems to think it is impossible for teenage boys to be sexually abused by a female. "Not when it comes to boners. The law of boners is incontrovertible." Yeah, that still doesn't mean anything. It's just more macho talk bullshit. Guys just want to fuck anything and everything, yo! All 3,5 billion of us! Nobody thinks differently than I do! If you can get a boner in a situation, you consent!
Average European Member	Mon May 08 03:18:35 Sooo, the president-elect of France is someone who was groomed at the age of 15 by his then 39yo teacher (against parents wishes), to the extent that he became a cuck and married her. He was robbed of any chance of having a normal relationship. He's stuck with a melted-looking wax figurine with dentures. But hey, it's all worth it because he got Le Peepee wet way back when.
zavyx Member	Mon May 08 11:14:28 boys and girls aren't the same at all - 15 year old boys are horny morning, noon and night. 15 year old girls only get horny 48 hours before they start bleeding. of course 15 year old boys should be able to bang 35 year old women - but 35 year old men should not be banging 15 year old girls, unless he's happy to get blood on his cock.
	show deleted posts

Your Name:
Your Password:
Your Message: