Utopia Talk / Politics / What representative will Californian get

jergul Member	Sat Oct 23 16:46:00 There you go hot rod. Will delete the irrelevant thread as per your request.
Hot Rod Member	Sat Oct 23 16:49:50 I DID *****NOT***** REQUEST MY THREAD BE DELETED.
Hot Rod Member	Sat Oct 23 16:50:50 PLEASE RETURN IT TO THE FORUM. Thank you.
jergul Member	Sat Oct 23 16:51:32 You did. You asked I create a new one without the non-sense alternatives you offered. Standard forum practice is then to delete duplicate threads. Be careful for what you ask. You might get it :)
W Member	Sat Oct 23 16:52:13 LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!
jergul Member	Sat Oct 23 16:52:55 Sorry hot rod. We have a policy against duplicate threads. So you will have to live with the one you requested. Oh, and change the battery on your hearing aid. Caps may help you hear, but the rest of us do not need the audio-visual enhancement.
Hot Rod Member	Sat Oct 23 16:55:57 "Then go somewhere and, "rephrase the thread topic..."" Exactly where dose it say specifically *T DELETE MY THREAD*?
Hot Rod Member	Sat Oct 23 16:57:59 WHERE? "MODERATORS COMMITMENTS: We will never delete stuff for the hell of it. We will ONLY delete blatant SPAM, really horrible troll threads that die instantly and have a zero "LOL" value, accidental double posts, and posts that the author requests to be deleted will be deleted. Please label ALL off topic threads as "OT" and if you post something naughty, please give a warning so those viewing at work won't all of a sudden be collecting unemployment checks. The Mods will be open to requests made in the Mod Thread, depending on the circumstances. The Mod Thread will be cleaned regularly. Don't start a discussion there or you may lose it." wHO MADE YOU JUDGE, JURY AND EXECUTIONER?
jergul Member	Sat Oct 23 16:58:27 I did and then deleted the duplicate thread as per forum practice. On your request.
jergul Member	Sat Oct 23 16:59:19 You cannot execute a dead man Hot Rod. And according to your brother, you are dead indeed.
Jewgle Member	Sat Oct 23 16:59:36 "wHO MADE YOU JUDGE, JURY AND EXECUTIONER? " Oh, I can answer this one. When 'Moderator' was bestowed upon.
Hot Rod Member	Sat Oct 23 17:04:38 THEREE WERE LEGITIMATE POSTS IN THAT THREAD YOU ARE ABUSING YOUR POWER. I DID NOT REQUEST MY THREAD BE DELETED, I SUGGEST YOU GO SOME WHERE ELSE AND START YOUR OWN THREAD. YOURS IS NOT EVEN A DUPLICAT, IT ASKS A TOTALLY DIFFERENT QUESTION. MINE: Will Californi Get What The Need or..." YOURS: "What representative will Californian get" "Will Californi Get What The Need or..." NOT EVEN CLOSE TO BEING A DUPLICATE THREAD. KINDLY RESTORE MY THREAD.
Hot Rod Member	Sat Oct 23 17:05:54 SCRATCH "Will Californi Get What The Need or..." UNDER *YOURS:*
Jewgle Member	Sat Oct 23 17:11:00 "THEREE WERE LEGITIMATE POSTS IN THAT THREAD YOU ARE ABUSING YOUR POWER. " Ahem! "wHO MADE YOU JUDGE, JURY AND EXECUTIONER?" Well? "I DID NOT REQUEST MY THREAD BE DELETED, I SUGGEST YOU GO SOME WHERE ELSE AND START YOUR OWN THREAD. " The word "THE" is what should be focused on. You should review what you've said. "YOURS IS NOT EVEN A DUPLICAT, IT ASKS A TOTALLY DIFFERENT QUESTION. " Per your request, respectively
jergul Member	Sat Oct 23 17:12:12 You seem "tired and emotional" to quote Yes Minister. I am pretty sure the other thread is a duplicate of this one, so am disinclined to restore it. But feel free to ask a different moderator. He may restore it. Judgement calls are never abusive and you can seek remedy in the way I suggested. Though note that this thread was created specifically on your request to cover a topic existing in the now redundant duplicate. And do change your hearing aid battery. Sort of jars the eyes and ears of habitual forum users those caps of yours.
jergul Member	Sat Oct 23 17:18:30 Problem solved. Hot Stick prodded and delved into the matter. Your internal void filled by his manly and decisive thrust. http://ata...hread=39552&time=1287871863173 I trust you are uhm satisfied Hot Rod. But if not yet sated, then perhaps someone else can complete the vigorous activity you may require? If never hurts to ask if you want more.
Hot Rod Member	Sat Oct 23 17:22:38 jergul, YOU HAVE JUST PROVED EVERY NEGATIVE THOUGHT I HAVE HAD ABOUT YOU TO BE TRUE. SINCE THE GOVERNOR OF A STATE IS NOT A REPRESENTATIVE PER SE HERE IS THE ANSWER TO *****YOUR**** SPECIFIC QUESTION, "What representative will Californian get" HERE IS MY GUESS. Adams, Anthony Rep 59th (916) 319-2059 Room 4015 [email] Ammiano, Tom Dem 13th (916) 319-2013 Room 4005 [email] Anderson, Joel Rep 77th (916) 319-2077 Room 2130 comments Arambula, Juan Ind 31st (916) 319-2031 Room 2141 [email] Bass, Karen Dem 47th (916) 319-2047 Room 319 [email] Beall, Jim Jr. Dem 24th (916) 319-2024 Room 5016 comments Berryhill, Bill Rep 26th (916) 319-2026 Room 4009 [email] Berryhill, Tom Rep 25th (916) 319-2025 Room 3141 [email] Block, Marty Dem 78th (916) 319-2078 Room 3132 [email] Blumenfield, Bob Dem 40th (916) 319-2040 Room 6026 [email] Bradford, Steven Dem 51st (916) 319-2051 Room 5136 comments Brownley, Julia Dem 41st (916) 319-2041 Room 2163 comments Buchanan, Joan Dem 15th (916) 319-2015 Room 4167 [email] Caballero, Anna M. Dem 28th (916) 319-2028 Room 5119 [email] Calderon, Charles M. Dem 58th (916) 319-2058 Room 2117 comments Carter, Wilmer Amina Dem 62nd (916) 319-2062 Room 2136 comments Chesbro, Wesley Dem 1st (916) 319-2001 Room 2176 comments Conway, Connie Rep 34th (916) 319-2034 Room 6027 comments Cook, Paul Rep 65th (916) 319-2065 Room 5164 comments Coto, Joe Dem 23rd (916) 319-2023 Room 2196 [email] Davis, Mike Dem 48th (916) 319-2048 Room 2160 comments De La Torre, Hector Dem 50th (916) 319-2050 Room 4016 comments de Leon, Kevin Dem 45th (916) 319-2045 Room 6011 [email] DeVore, Chuck Rep 70th (916) 319-2070 Room 4102 comments Eng, Mike Dem 49th (916) 319-2049 Room 4140 [email] Evans, Noreen Dem 7th (916) 319-2007 Room 5150 [email] Feuer, Mike Dem 42nd (916) 319-2042 Room 3146 [email] Fletcher, Nathan Rep 75th (916) 319-2075 Room 2111 comments Fong, Paul Dem 22nd (916) 319-2022 Room 5135 [email] Fuentes, Felipe Dem 39th (916) 319-2039 Room 2114 [email] Fuller, Jean Rep 32nd (916) 319-2032 Room 3098 comments Furutani, Warren T. Dem 55th (916) 319-2055 Room 3126 [email] Gaines, Ted Rep 4th (916) 319-2004 Room 4144 comments Galgiani, Cathleen Dem 17th (916) 319-2017 Room 5155 comments Garrick, Martin Rep 74th (916) 319-2074 Room 3104 [email] Gatto, Mike Dem 43rd (916) 319-2043 Room 2175 [email] Gilmore, Danny D. Rep 30th (916) 319-2030 Room 2174 [email] Hagman, Curt Rep 60th (916) 319-2060 Room 4116 comments Hall, Isadore III Dem 52nd (916) 319-2052 Room 6025 comments Harkey, Diane L. Rep 73rd 916) 319-2073 Room 4177 comments Hayashi, Mary Dem 18th (916) 319-2018 Room 3013 [email] Hernandez, Edward P. Dem 57th (916) 319-2057 Room 4112 [email] Hill, Jerry Dem 19th (916) 319-2019 Room 4146 comments Huber, Alyson Dem 10th (916) 319-2010 Room 2179 [email] Huffman, Jared Dem 6th (916) 319-2006 Room 3120 comments Jeffries, Kevin Rep 66th (916) 319-2066 Room 5128 comments Jones, Dave Dem 9th (916) 319-2009 Room 5175 [email] Knight, Steve Rep 36th (916) 319-2036 Room 2016 comments Lieu, Ted W. Dem 53rd (916) 319-2053 Room 3091 [email] Logue, Dan Rep 3rd (916) 319-2003 Room 4158 [email] Lowenthal, Bonnie Dem 54th (916) 319-2054 Room 5158 [email] Ma, Fiona Dem 12th (916) 319-2012 Room 3173 [email] Mendoza, Tony Dem 56th (916) 319-2056 Room 2188 [email] Miller, Jeff Rep 71st (916) 319-2071 Room 3147 [email] Monning, William W. Dem 27th (916) 319-2027 Room 6005 [email] Nava, Pedro Dem 35th (916) 319-2035 Room 2148 comments Nestande, Brian Rep 64th (916) 319-2064 Room 4153 comments Niello, Roger Rep 5th (916) 319-2005 Room 4139 [email] Nielsen, Jim Rep 2nd (916) 319-2002 Room 6031 comments Norby, Chris Rep 72nd (916) 319-2072 Room 2002 [email] Pérez, John A. Dem 46th (916) 319-2046 Room 219 [email] Pérez, V. Manuel Dem 80th (916) 319-2080 Room 4162 [email] Portantino, Anthony J. Dem 44th (916) 319-2044 Room 2003 comments Ruskin, Ira Dem 21st (916) 319-2021 Room 3123 [email] Salas, Mary Dem 79th (916) 319-2079 Room 2137 comments Saldaña, Lori Dem 76th (916) 319-2076 Room 3152 [email] Silva, Jim Rep 67th (916) 319-2067 Room 2170 comments Skinner, Nancy Dem 14th (916) 319-2014 Room 4126 [email] Smyth, Cameron Rep 38th (916) 319-2038 Room 4098 comments Solorio, Jose Dem 69th (916) 319-2069 Room 2013 [email] Strickland, Audra Rep 37th (916) 319-2037 Room 4208 comments Swanson, Sandre R. Dem 16th (916) 319-2016 Room 6012 comments Torlakson, Tom Dem 11th (916) 319-2011 Room 5160 [email] Torres, Norma J. Dem 61st (916) 319-2061 Room 4164 [email] Torrico, Alberto Dem 20th (916) 319-2020 Room 3160 [email] Tran, Van Rep 68th (916) 319-2068 Room 4130 comments Villines, Michael N. Rep 29th (916) 319-2029 Room 4117 [email] Yamada, Mariko
jergul Member	Sat Oct 23 17:25:07 I somehow have to wonder if you keep this up your brothers words may become true. I can promise you something in lieu of flowers, that is for sure :)
Hot Rod Member	Sat Oct 23 17:30:21 Now you are threatening me? I am going away now before you decide to unilaterally DOS every post I make.
jergul Member	Sat Oct 23 17:32:01 A pain in the left arm should not be ignored, particularly now that I have threatened not to send flowers to your funeral.
jergul Member	Sat Oct 23 17:34:27 Anyways, don't sweat it HR, after all, if we cannot laugh about your inevitable death, then what can we laugh about at all? Humour is the best medicine after all :)
Hot Rod Member	Sat Oct 23 17:37:01 LOL, you got that right. But don't forget that you will die someday too. Perhaps we will meet face to face in hell.
miltonfriedman Member	Sat Oct 23 17:37:21 Retard Rod, Why are you such a faggot?
jergul Member	Sat Oct 23 17:38:46 Nah, everyone know atheists go nowhere at all. Besides, I am married. Death is the least of my problems.
Rugian Member	Mon Oct 25 08:53:44 This thread is like a treasure trove of source material for the Hot Rod multis.
mexicantornado Member	Mon Oct 25 10:21:09 This was pretty brutal.
Hot Rod Member	Mon Oct 25 10:42:47 Brutal for who? The mod who abused his power or the poster who had his comment twisted into something that any donkey would know was not intended.
Nekran Member	Mon Oct 25 10:46:01 The smart reaction would have been something along the lines of "Well played, sir", HR, even if really you actually care. I thought playgrounds were tougher back in your day? You should really learn how to handle these things.
Milton Bradley Member	Mon Oct 25 10:50:29 WASHINGTON â?? The United States has found 500 chemical weapons in Iraq since 2003, and more weapons of mass destruction are likely to be uncovered, two Republican lawmakers said Wednesday. "We have found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, chemical weapons," Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa., said in a quickly called press conference late Wednesday afternoon. Reading from a declassified portion of a report by the National Ground Intelligence Center, a Defense Department intelligence unit, Santorum said: "Since 2003, coalition forces have recovered approximately 500 weapons munitions which contain degraded mustard or sarin nerve agent. Despite many efforts to locate and destroy Iraq's pre-Gulf War chemical munitions, filled and unfilled pre-Gulf War chemical munitions are assessed to still exist." â?¢ Click here to read the declassified portion of the NGIC report. He added that the report warns about the hazards that the chemical weapons could still pose to coalition troops in Iraq. "The purity of the agents inside the munitions depends on many factors, including the manufacturing process, potential additives and environmental storage conditions. While agents degrade over time, chemical warfare agents remain hazardous and potentially lethal," Santorum read from the document. "This says weapons have been discovered, more weapons exist and they state that Iraq was not a WMD-free zone, that there are continuing threats from the materials that are or may still be in Iraq," said Rep. Pete Hoekstra, R-Mich., chairman of the House Intelligence Committee. The weapons are thought to be manufactured before 1991 so they would not be proof of an ongoing WMD program in the 1990s. But they do show that Saddam Hussein was lying when he said all weapons had been destroyed, and it shows that years of on-again, off-again weapons inspections did not uncover these munitions. Hoekstra said the report, completed in April but only declassified now, shows that "there is still a lot about Iraq that we don't fully understand." Related StoriesWife Says Marine Shocked by Murder of Iraqi Civilian Allegations Iraqi Police Free Hostages; 5 U.S. Troops Killed Senate Democrats Caught in Tough Spot on Iraq House Rejects Timetable for Troop Withdrawal From Iraq Bush Critics Want Tougher U.S. Approach to Iran AP: U.S. Military Bringing Equipment Home U.S. Official: Soldier Was Beheaded Dozens of Factory Workers Abducted in Iraq Iraq Insurgents: We Will Kill 4 Kidnapped Russian Diplomats Al Qaeda in Iraq Leader Killed in Airstrike Near Where U.S. Troops Went Missing Group: New Al Qaeda in Iraq Leader Killed GIs Military Recovers Bodies of Missing GIs VideoDid U.S. Troops Find WMDs? Asked why the Bush administration, if it had known about the information since April or earlier, didn't advertise it, Hoekstra conjectured that the president has been forward-looking and concentrating on the development of a secure government in Iraq. Offering the official administration response to FOX News, a senior Defense Department official pointed out that the chemical weapons were not in useable conditions. "This does not reflect a capacity that was built up after 1991," the official said, adding the munitions "are not the WMDs this country and the rest of the world believed Iraq had, and not the WMDs for which this country went to war." The official said the findings did raise questions about the years of weapons inspections that had not resulted in locating the fairly sizeable stash of chemical weapons. And he noted that it may say something about Hussein's intent and desire. The report does suggest that some of the weapons were likely put on the black market and may have been used outside Iraq. He also said that the Defense Department statement shortly after the March 2003 invasion saying that "we had all known weapons facilities secured," has proven itself to be untrue. "It turned out the whole country was an ammo dump," he said, adding that on more than one occasion, a conventional weapons site has been uncovered and chemical weapons have been discovered mixed within them. Hoekstra and Santorum lamented that Americans were given the impression after a 16-month search conducted by the Iraq Survey Group that the evidence of continuing research and development of weapons of mass destruction was insignificant. But the National Ground Intelligence Center took up where the ISG left off when it completed its report in November 2004, and in the process of collecting intelligence for the purpose of force protection for soldiers and sailors still on the ground in Iraq, has shown that the weapons inspections were incomplete, they and others have said. "We know it was there, in place, it just wasn't operative when inspectors got there after the war, but we know what the inspectors found from talking with the scientists in Iraq that it could have been cranked up immediately, and that's what Saddam had planned to do if the sanctions against Iraq had halted and they were certainly headed in that direction," said Fred Barnes, editor of The Weekly Standard and a FOX News contributor. "It is significant. Perhaps, the administration just, they think they weathered the debate over WMD being found there immediately and don't want to return to it again because things are otherwise going better for them, and then, I think, there's mindless resistance to releasing any classified documents from Iraq," Barnes said. The release of the declassified materials comes as the Senate debates Democratic proposals to create a timetable for U.S. troops to withdraw from Iraq. The debate has had the effect of creating disunity among Democrats, a majority of whom shrunk Wednesday from an amendment proposed by Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts to have troops to be completely withdrawn from Iraq by the middle of next year. At the same time, congressional Republicans have stayed highly united, rallying around a White House that has seen successes in the last couple weeks, first with the death of terror leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, then the completion of the formation of Iraq's Cabinet and then the announcement Tuesday that another key Al Qaeda in Iraq leader, "religious emir" Mansour Suleiman Mansour Khalifi al-Mashhadani, or Sheik Mansour, was also killed in a U.S. airstrike. Santorum pointed out that during Wednesday's debate, several Senate Democrats said that no weapons of mass destruction had been found in Iraq, a claim, he said, that the declassified document proves is untrue. "This is an incredibly â?? in my mind â?? significant finding. The idea that, as my colleagues have repeatedly said in this debate on the other side of the aisle, that there are no weapons of mass destruction, is in fact false," he said. As a result of this new information, under the aegis of his chairmanship, Hoekstra said he is going to ask for more reporting by the various intelligence agencies about weapons of mass destruction. "We are working on the declassification of the report. We are going to do a thorough search of what additional reports exist in the intelligence community. And we are going to put additional pressure on the Department of Defense and the folks in Iraq to more fully pursue a complete investigation of what existed in Iraq before the war," Hoekstra said. FOX News' Jim Angle and Sharon Kehnemui Liss contributed to this report. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,200499,00.html (((((2006))))))
mexicantornado Member	Mon Oct 25 10:50:52 brutal for you, you got pretty fucked up in this thread HR and all your reactions were predicted and only hurt you more.
Firestorm Phoenix Member	Mon Oct 25 11:07:49 That was some hard ownage there. It was almost a tangible thing.
Hot Rod Member	Mon Oct 25 11:10:47 MT, not sure if you live in California or not, but if you do or did. Bear in mind that *MY* thread clearly indicated the two front runners for the office of governor and *NOT* the entire legislature as jergul's indicates. Which candidate for *GOVERNOR* would you vote for? * Jerry Brown * Meg Whitman * Carlos Alvarez (Peace and Freedom) * Chelene Nightingale (American Independent) * Dale Ogden (Libertarian) * Laura Wells (Green) OR Adams, Anthony Rep 59th (916) 319-2059 Room 4015 [email] Ammiano, Tom Dem 13th (916) 319-2013 Room 4005 [email] Anderson, Joel Rep 77th (916) 319-2077 Room 2130 comments Arambula, Juan Ind 31st (916) 319-2031 Room 2141 [email] Bass, Karen Dem 47th (916) 319-2047 Room 319 [email] Beall, Jim Jr. Dem 24th (916) 319-2024 Room 5016 comments Berryhill, Bill Rep 26th (916) 319-2026 Room 4009 [email] Berryhill, Tom Rep 25th (916) 319-2025 Room 3141 [email] Block, Marty Dem 78th (916) 319-2078 Room 3132 [email] Blumenfield, Bob Dem 40th (916) 319-2040 Room 6026 [email] Bradford, Steven Dem 51st (916) 319-2051 Room 5136 comments Brownley, Julia Dem 41st (916) 319-2041 Room 2163 comments Buchanan, Joan Dem 15th (916) 319-2015 Room 4167 [email] Caballero, Anna M. Dem 28th (916) 319-2028 Room 5119 [email] Calderon, Charles M. Dem 58th (916) 319-2058 Room 2117 comments Carter, Wilmer Amina Dem 62nd (916) 319-2062 Room 2136 comments Chesbro, Wesley Dem 1st (916) 319-2001 Room 2176 comments Conway, Connie Rep 34th (916) 319-2034 Room 6027 comments Cook, Paul Rep 65th (916) 319-2065 Room 5164 comments Coto, Joe Dem 23rd (916) 319-2023 Room 2196 [email] Davis, Mike Dem 48th (916) 319-2048 Room 2160 comments De La Torre, Hector Dem 50th (916) 319-2050 Room 4016 comments de Leon, Kevin Dem 45th (916) 319-2045 Room 6011 [email] DeVore, Chuck Rep 70th (916) 319-2070 Room 4102 comments Eng, Mike Dem 49th (916) 319-2049 Room 4140 [email] Evans, Noreen Dem 7th (916) 319-2007 Room 5150 [email] Feuer, Mike Dem 42nd (916) 319-2042 Room 3146 [email] Fletcher, Nathan Rep 75th (916) 319-2075 Room 2111 comments Fong, Paul Dem 22nd (916) 319-2022 Room 5135 [email] Fuentes, Felipe Dem 39th (916) 319-2039 Room 2114 [email] Fuller, Jean Rep 32nd (916) 319-2032 Room 3098 comments Furutani, Warren T. Dem 55th (916) 319-2055 Room 3126 [email] Gaines, Ted Rep 4th (916) 319-2004 Room 4144 comments Galgiani, Cathleen Dem 17th (916) 319-2017 Room 5155 comments Garrick, Martin Rep 74th (916) 319-2074 Room 3104 [email] Gatto, Mike Dem 43rd (916) 319-2043 Room 2175 [email] Gilmore, Danny D. Rep 30th (916) 319-2030 Room 2174 [email] Hagman, Curt Rep 60th (916) 319-2060 Room 4116 comments Hall, Isadore III Dem 52nd (916) 319-2052 Room 6025 comments Harkey, Diane L. Rep 73rd 916) 319-2073 Room 4177 comments Hayashi, Mary Dem 18th (916) 319-2018 Room 3013 [email] Hernandez, Edward P. Dem 57th (916) 319-2057 Room 4112 [email] Hill, Jerry Dem 19th (916) 319-2019 Room 4146 comments Huber, Alyson Dem 10th (916) 319-2010 Room 2179 [email] Huffman, Jared Dem 6th (916) 319-2006 Room 3120 comments Jeffries, Kevin Rep 66th (916) 319-2066 Room 5128 comments Jones, Dave Dem 9th (916) 319-2009 Room 5175 [email] Knight, Steve Rep 36th (916) 319-2036 Room 2016 comments Lieu, Ted W. Dem 53rd (916) 319-2053 Room 3091 [email] Logue, Dan Rep 3rd (916) 319-2003 Room 4158 [email] Lowenthal, Bonnie Dem 54th (916) 319-2054 Room 5158 [email] Ma, Fiona Dem 12th (916) 319-2012 Room 3173 [email] Mendoza, Tony Dem 56th (916) 319-2056 Room 2188 [email] Miller, Jeff Rep 71st (916) 319-2071 Room 3147 [email] Monning, William W. Dem 27th (916) 319-2027 Room 6005 [email] Nava, Pedro Dem 35th (916) 319-2035 Room 2148 comments Nestande, Brian Rep 64th (916) 319-2064 Room 4153 comments Niello, Roger Rep 5th (916) 319-2005 Room 4139 [email] Nielsen, Jim Rep 2nd (916) 319-2002 Room 6031 comments Norby, Chris Rep 72nd (916) 319-2072 Room 2002 [email] P�©rez, John A. Dem 46th (916) 319-2046 Room 219 [email] P�©rez, V. Manuel Dem 80th (916) 319-2080 Room 4162 [email] Portantino, Anthony J. Dem 44th (916) 319-2044 Room 2003 comments Ruskin, Ira Dem 21st (916) 319-2021 Room 3123 [email] Salas, Mary Dem 79th (916) 319-2079 Room 2137 comments Salda�±a, Lori Dem 76th (916) 319-2076 Room 3152 [email] Silva, Jim Rep 67th (916) 319-2067 Room 2170 comments Skinner, Nancy Dem 14th (916) 319-2014 Room 4126 [email] Smyth, Cameron Rep 38th (916) 319-2038 Room 4098 comments Solorio, Jose Dem 69th (916) 319-2069 Room 2013 [email] Strickland, Audra Rep 37th (916) 319-2037 Room 4208 comments Swanson, Sandre R. Dem 16th (916) 319-2016 Room 6012 comments Torlakson, Tom Dem 11th (916) 319-2011 Room 5160 [email] Torres, Norma J. Dem 61st (916) 319-2061 Room 4164 [email] Torrico, Alberto Dem 20th (916) 319-2020 Room 3160 [email] Tran, Van Rep 68th (916) 319-2068 Room 4130 comments Villines, Michael N. Rep 29th (916) 319-2029 Room 4117 [email] Yamada, Mariko
Milton Bradley Member	Mon Oct 25 11:13:44 http://www...hread=39535&time=1288016664130 But in this thread, you were shown how wrong you are/were.
Hot Rod Member	Mon Oct 25 11:27:57 In the other thread I told him to go somewhere else and rephrase the title. I DID NOT SAY TO DELETE MY THREAD. HE PURPOSELY MISCONSTRUED WHAT I SAID PURELY BECAUSE OF OUR PAST DIFFERENCES. If you cannot see tyhat, or don't want to see that, then you are a bigger yahoo than he is. But, what else is new. ,,!,,
Milton Bradley Member	Mon Oct 25 11:29:31 "HE PURPOSELY MISCONSTRUED WHAT I SAID PURELY BECAUSE OF OUR PAST DIFFERENCES. " That's quite an accusation, do you have any proof of this of being the motive? Anyways, that thread clearly shows how wrong you are/were.
Nekran Member	Mon Oct 25 11:32:57 Right or wrong, you handle it so badly, HR. Emoitional reactions in caps will only invite more of the same... how do you not grasp that at your age?
Hot Rod Member	Mon Oct 25 11:48:43 Nekran, sometimes I get mad when faced with utter stupidity and unfairness and that is the only way I have to express myself. jergul can sue me in open court if he wishes to come here and file charges.
Milton Bradley Member	Mon Oct 25 11:50:18 You got mad because you were shown how embarrassingly wrong you were/are.
jergul Member	Mon Oct 25 14:24:56 You really are the master of projection HR. You feel wronged, so I should sue you? Anyway - Your recourse in this forum is to have another moderator restore the thread after I gave you the reasons for my judgement call on the matter. It beats whining impotently at least. Give it a go. See what happens.
Canadian Member	Mon Oct 25 15:44:49 Grow up HR, you've had more time than us.
Hot Rod Member	Mon Oct 25 17:34:00 Let's put it this way. I know that governor has a specific meaning and that representative can apply to various office holders. My OP was specific to the office of governor of California. jerguls thread, while it could conceivably include the office of governor of California, it was *not* specific and it's lack of context left it open to interpretation that his thread could conceivably refer to *any office holder* in the state of California that represents the interests of the state of California. I chose the interpretation that jergul was, indeed, referring to the meaning of representative to mean the latter.
Milton Bradley Member	Mon Oct 25 17:34:56 Everyone understood the reference, except you. You are wrong again.
Hot Rod Member	Mon Oct 25 17:54:57 So you are stating *CATEGORICALLY* that jergul's use of the word *representative* in his thread title refers *ONLY* to the office of governor and
Hot Rod Member	Mon Oct 25 18:03:13 So you are stating *CATEGORICALLY* that jergul's use of the word *representative* in his thread title refers *ONLY* to the office of governor and *CANNOT POSSIBLE* refer to any other office holder in the State? That the *ONLY* office holder in California that *represents* the people of California is the governor? Are you *REALLY* saying that? I really would like a yes or no answer to that. MB - Everyone understood the reference, except you. And every one of you yahoos who claim to be able to read my mind, and insist that you "know" what I meant better than I did, are a bunch of pretentious "folks" who never get anything rigt.
Hot Rod Member	Mon Oct 25 18:06:24 *-right
Milton Bradley Member	Mon Oct 25 18:16:01 "So you are stating *CATEGORICALLY* that jergul's use of the word *representative* in his thread title refers *ONLY* to the office of governor and " Yes, because it is a known fact that there are more than two people running for governor of CA and they are representing the state as governor. This was per your request.
Milton Bradley Member	Mon Oct 25 18:19:36 *could potentially be representing the state as governor.
miltonfriedman Member	Mon Oct 25 18:20:21 "And every one of you yahoos who claim to be able to read my mind, and insist that you "know" what I meant better than I did, are a bunch of pretentious "folks" who never get anything rigt." This means that you probably should write better so that you can better present your thoughts without having us to guess them.
Milton Bradley Member	Mon Oct 25 18:20:24 "And every one of you yahoos who claim to be able to read my mind, and insist that you "know" what I meant better than I did, are a bunch of pretentious "folks" who never get anything rigt. " No, we understand what jergul meant with the rephrasing of the thread title, per your request.
Hot Rod Member	Mon Oct 25 18:33:57 MB - This was per your request. "And every one of you yahoos who claim to be able to read my mind, and insist that you "know" what I meant better than I did, are a bunch of pretentious "folks" who never get anything rigt."
Milton Bradley Member	Mon Oct 25 18:35:31 You made the request, no reading your mind when you request was fulfilled.
Hot Rod Member	Mon Oct 25 18:49:17 MB - Yes, because it is a known fact that there are more than two people running for governor of CA and they are representing the state as governor. So absolutely no one else in the entire State of California *represents* the interests of the people of California except the person who holds the office of governor? *****ABSOLUTELY NONE*****? BTW, precisely where does jergul specify the office of governor? >-No, we understand what jergul meant with the rephrasing of the thread title, per your request. I do not care how "we" interpreted jerguls statement, *I* interpreted it differently. So, what you are saying is *THAT ONLY YOUR INTERPRETATION* has any validity. I didn't think you could possibly be anymore silly than you have proven yourself in the past, but you have really reached new depths in this issue. You people are not worth my time and, frankly, you bore me.
Milton Bradley Member	Mon Oct 25 18:55:53 "So absolutely no one else in the entire State of California *represents* the interests of the people of California except the person who holds the office of governor? " Topic of was about the governors race. That was the subject, are you now stating that it wasn't the subject? "BTW, precisely where does jergul specify the office of governor? " By rephrasing the title of the thread per your request, subject did not change. "I do not care how "we" interpreted jerguls statement, *I* interpreted it differently." And you were wrong. "So, what you are saying is *THAT ONLY YOUR INTERPRETATION* has any validity. " Consensus says otherwise concering the subject matter and the title being reprhased, by your request. "I didn't think you could possibly be anymore silly than you have proven yourself in the past, but you have really reached new depths in this issue. " I appreciate the compliment. I strive to be able to comprehend simple things, perhaps if I were in your shoes, having a 8th grade education, perhaps maybe I could have the interpreting skills that you possess. Too bad... "You people are not worth my time and, frankly, you bore me." Is that your concession that you understand you were wrong? Thank you, only took the whole day for you to understand this.
Hot Rod Member	Mon Oct 25 21:13:47 LOL, where oh where did your logic go?
mrbeer Member	Tue Oct 26 04:19:24 I don't understand why Hot Rod is complaining so much, when he clearly wanted jergul to delete the unrequired thread. jergul has acted with wisdom and integrity and this is the thanks he gets? For shame Hot Rod, for shame.
	show deleted posts

Your Name:
Your Password:
Your Message: