Utopia Talk / Politics / Conservatives expose the Liberal Media

Aeros Member	Wed Sep 29 17:35:23 http://siu...entary-takes-a-strange-detour/ Our Documentary Takes A Strange Detour I've been a reporter for nine years. My first official day on the job was on 9-11. I was the bureau chief in Dubuque, Iowa, working as a one-man band. I shot my own video, set up my own live shots, and edited my own stories. I would bring home the police scanner to make sure the nights were quiet in this modest town along the grand Mississippi River. Only one time, in my year and two months working there, did that scanner wake me up. (It would be the first murder story I covered. I remember being one of the first reporters to show up. The police were hosing down the blood off the sidewalk, and the bloody water washed over my shoes. It's something you don't forget.) Those days were long, and physical. I would go home and count the bruises on my legs and arms. There was nothing glamorous about this life. But that's what I liked about it. I was a reporter â?? and I was proud of that. As a woman in the news industry you have to be tough. I have always had to work harder than my male counterparts to be taken seriously and to be treated with respect. As a woman in the news industry you have to ignore all of the silly talk from your managers about the clothes you should wear on-air or what color your hair should be. I have had my share of conversations like that, and to be honest, it stings. I'm left wondering, "When will my work stand on its own? Why does this always have to be part of the conversation?" Recently, I was the target of a failed punk. James O'Keefe, the so-called "pimp" in the ACORN expose videos, was participating in a detailed plan to "faux" seduce me on his boat. For months, I had been working on a documentary about the young conservative movement. James had called me about concerns he had regarding an upcoming shoot. He asked me to meet him to talk about the shoot. I agreed to fly to Maryland and then drive to his "office" for a face-to-face conversation with him. When I showed up, there was no office, as promised. Instead, he wanted to get me on a boat, which we later learned, was staged as a "pleasure palace." One of his colleagues, Izzy Santa, who was in Maryland that day, told me about the plan and stopped the punk before it happened. Izzy told me he had "strawberries and champagne" waiting for me on the boat, and that he planned to "hit on me" the entire time. She said it would all be captured on hidden cameras that had been set up on the boat and in the back yard. She said the sole purpose of the "punk" was to embarrass me, and to make CNN look bad. I would soon learn the details of the plan, in a 13-page document titled, "CNN Caper." It explains the type of equipment needed to stage the boat for our meeting. Here is how the document reads: Equipment needed a. Video 1. hidden cams on the boat 2. tripod and overt recorder near the bed, an obvious sex tape machine b. Props 1. condom jar 2. dildos 3. Music a. Alicia keys b. 80s romance songs, things that are typically James c. avoid Marvin Gaye as too cliche 4. lube 5. ceiling mirror 6. posters and paintings of naked women 7. playboys and pornographic magazines 8. candles 9. Viagra and stamina pills 10. fuzzy handcuffs 11. blindfold James was supposed to tape the following script before the meeting on the boat. "My name is James, I work in video activism and journalism. I've been approached by CNN for an interview where I know what their angle is: they want to portray me and my friends as crazies, as non-journalists, as unprofessional and likely as homophobes, racists or bigots of some sortâ?¦" "Instead, I've decided to have a little fun. Instead of giving her a serious interview, I'm going to punk CNN. Abbie has been trying to seduce me to use me, in order to spin a lie about me. So, I'm going to seduce her, on camera, to use her for a video. This bubble-headed-bleach-blonde who comes on at five will get a taste of her own medicine, she'll get seduced on camera and you'll get to see the awkwardness and the aftermath." "Please sit back and enjoy the show." It explains very simply what "the joke" is. "The joke is that the tables have turned on CNN. Using hot blondes to seduce interviewees to get screwed on television, you are faux seducing her in order to screw her on television." It goes on to explain how James should "adapt" to my mood on the boat. "As the operation is going on, James will have to adapt and adjust to her mood and her reaction. If she is pulling away, withdraw and pull her back in. If she's unsure, comfort her and reassure her. Vacillate between somewhat serious interview and the come-hither persona as needed in order to confuse her judgment and also keep her on the boat." James says that he wasn't really going to follow through with the plan. He e-mailed CNN this statement: "That is not my work product. When it was sent to me, I immediately found certain elements highly objectionable and inappropriate, and did not consider them for one minute following it." But that does not appear to be true, according to a series of emails we obtained from Izzy Santa, who says the e-mails reveal James' true intentions. All of this is so disappointing. I never wanted to become a part of the story â?? especially under such strange circumstances. I have worked so hard to have people pay attention to my work, and to be a respected journalist. I don't want to be judged based on anything other than my work. But apparently, I represent all of the things this group hates about the mainstream media. They feel because of the way I look that I do not matter, and that my reporting is a joke. They don't know anything about my work ethic â?? my history â?? my dedication and commitment â?? and my love for reporting. They just saw my blonde hair. And the ironic thing is that I'm really a brunette.
Aeros Member	Wed Sep 29 17:40:26 http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/09/29/okeefe.cnn.prank/?hpt=T2
Dickhead UPer Member	Wed Sep 29 17:43:33 I already posted about the O'Keefe bullshit.
Hot Rod Member	Wed Sep 29 18:00:32 What a lying bitch, I would never believe a word she says.
Dickhead UPer Member	Wed Sep 29 18:02:40 The only liar and was proven a liar was O'Keefe, care to dispute it HR?
garyd Member	Wed Sep 29 18:06:33 And your point would be?
Hot Rod Member	Wed Sep 29 18:07:39 "My first official day on the job was on 9-11. I was the bureau chief in Dubuque, Iowa" No dispute, Case Closed.
Dickhead UPer Member	Wed Sep 29 18:11:47 The point is, is that you fuckheads that are so supportive of the Breitbarts and O'Keefes only prove how much of a low class you really are. Secondly, "No dispute, Case Closed. " What are you disputing that she didn't work in Dubuque?
garyd Member	Wed Sep 29 18:16:43 Oh so people who actually do investigative journalism of the old school don't deserve support? Or a second chance?
Dickhead UPer Member	Wed Sep 29 18:23:44 That investigative journalism done only one thig, cause an organization that obviously had it's issues, like any other organization, but provided a service to those who needed it to dissolve, only to find later that criminal charges could not be pressed against that organization. Also only to find that such videos were heavily editted and painted a skewed view. Only to find out that that this one individual happens to be a criminal and got caught in an obvious scheme to dupe a CNN reporter to try and embarrass CNN on behalf of a another news agency that would most likely deny any affiliation with this individual only when it's convenient. Please, get a grip.
Hot Rod Member	Wed Sep 29 18:24:35 No Dickhead, nobody starts their first day in journalism as a bureau chief. "I've been a reporter for nine years. My first official day on the job was on 9-11. I was the bureau chief in Dubuque, Iowa..."
Dickhead UPer Member	Wed Sep 29 18:25:29 No one huh? Care to provide any evidence to this? Or should I take your word on it? Especially since you have impeccable integrity when it comes to truth?
Worst Post Ever Member	Wed Sep 29 18:33:03 "garyd Member Wed Sep 29 18:16:43 Oh so people who actually do investigative journalism of the old school don't deserve support? Or a second chance? "
Hot Rod Member	Wed Sep 29 18:40:44 Dickhead, are you really and truly that ignorant. If so I pity you.
Dickhead UPer Member	Wed Sep 29 18:41:56 I'm waiting, obviously you have some sort of information that you are withholding, please provide it. Go ahead...you were challenged, now provide what was asked.
Michael Palin Member	Wed Sep 29 18:48:13 old school journalism ROFL this is extremely retarded failed entrapment
Dickhead UPer Member	Wed Sep 29 18:53:35 With the facts that are provided regarding O'Keefe and his attempt to orchestrate such an elaborate and childish ploy, HR wants to challenge the report on unsubstantiated grounds.
Hot Rod Member	Wed Sep 29 19:06:42 Wait all you like, common sense says you do not start your first day on the job as The Chief of The Bureau.
I will lie lie lie Member	Wed Sep 29 19:07:29 ^
Dickhead UPer Member	Wed Sep 29 19:07:49 Motherfucker, either put up or shut up.
Hot Rod Member	Wed Sep 29 19:09:13 Go read a book, you might accidentally learn something.
Dickhead UPer Member	Wed Sep 29 19:11:10 "I was the bureau chief in Dubuque, Iowa, working as a one-man band. I shot my own video, set up my own live shots, and edited my own stories. I would bring home the police scanner to make sure the nights were quiet in this modest town along the grand Mississippi River." http://www...-Descriptions/BUREAU-CHIEF.cfm Directs and coordinates activities of personnel engaged in selecting, gathering, and editing news and news pictures in remote location or foreign country and transmitting to home office of newspaper or press syndicate: May translate dispatches into English or cable language. May perform duties of REPORTER. ---------------------------------------------- Now do you have any evidence to dispute her claims and reveal any inaccuracies about her resume? No? Then STFU.
Dickhead UPer Member	Wed Sep 29 19:11:59 So where here we have again, another enouncter with HR lying.
Dickhead UPer Member	Wed Sep 29 19:12:13 encounter*
Rugian Member	Wed Sep 29 19:14:22 Dickhead UPer: FYI. "Before joining KNXV-TV, Boudreau worked as an investigative reporter for WWMT, a CBS affiliate marketer in Kalamazoo/Grand Rapids, Mich. She started her job at KWWL-TV, an NBC affiliate marketer Waterloo, Iowa, as a one-man-band in Dubuque." http://eve...om/2010/09/abbie-boudreau.html
Dickhead UPer Member	Wed Sep 29 19:15:53 Which goes along with the description of your job title.
Rugian Member	Wed Sep 29 19:17:17 Didn't see your 19:11 post.
Dickhead UPer Member	Wed Sep 29 19:18:36 No biggie. *...with the description of her job title.
Hot Rod Member	Wed Sep 29 19:45:48 Dickhead - Now do you have any evidence to dispute her claims and reveal any inaccuracies about her resume? 9-11 was *OVER* nine years ago. The bitch is lying. "I've been a reporter for nine years. My first official day on the job was on 9-11. I was the bureau chief in Dubuque, Iowa..."
Dickhead UPer Member	Wed Sep 29 19:48:01 You are not great with the math, mr. 1000%
Dickhead UPer Member	Wed Sep 29 19:50:37 Stupid fucking troll.
miltonfriedman Member	Wed Sep 29 19:57:24 "9-11 was *OVER* nine years ago. The bitch is lying." Holy crap!!!
miltonfriedman Member	Wed Sep 29 19:58:48 Molester Rod just revealed to us that 9-11 attack happened more than 9 years ago. There is now no doubt left that Molester Rod has usurped JAlexB as the ringleader in the UP's Axis of Retards.
Ninja Member	Wed Sep 29 19:59:06 I love hot rod's logic. Lets see here, take the side of a guy who has proven to have edited a video together to take stuff out of context then proceed to get arrested trying to bug a government official's office to the point of being charged and on probation or claim that the reporter is a liar because nobody starts as bureau chief (despite not knowing what one does) and that 9/11 was over 9 years ago therefore "I've been a reporter for 9 years" is bogus. Lets see now... September 11, 2001 to September 29th 2010. Apparently to not be lying you have to say specify the number of days as well.
Hot Rod Member	Wed Sep 29 20:07:58 Dickhead - You are not great with the math, mr. 1000% LOL, still can't get over being trolled. :) You're special. "I've been a reporter for nine years." "My (FIRST OFFICIAL DAY* on the job was on 9-11." That would be September 11, 2001. This is September 28, 2010. +2010 -2001 ~~~~~ =0009 years "I was the bureau chief in Dubuque, Iowa..." She fucking lied.
Aeros Member	Wed Sep 29 20:08:20 Watching Hot Rod and Garyd try to defend this guy is so mind numbing.
Dickhead UPer Member	Wed Sep 29 20:09:28 HR just change your name to liar.
miltonfriedman Member	Wed Sep 29 20:11:38 ""I've been a reporter for nine years." "My (FIRST OFFICIAL DAY* on the job was on 9-11." That would be September 11, 2001. This is September 28, 2010. +2010 -2001 ~~~~~ =0009 years "I was the bureau chief in Dubuque, Iowa..." She fucking lied." Molester Rod, How did you manage to live with yourself when you typed that?
Aeros Member	Wed Sep 29 20:11:54 Why do you try to defend confessed and convicted criminals Hot Rod? The dude was convicted of lying to Federal Officials to gain access to a secure area. Dude is a convicted liar for Christ sake, and you are trying to split hairs to blame the reporter?
Aeros Member	Wed Sep 29 20:12:53 Also, all the info CNN reported on comes from his female "associate". Is she lying too?
Hot Rod Member	Wed Sep 29 20:20:29 All I am saying is, the bitch lied. Here statement is an obvious lie unless you just don't give a shit about the truth.
Dickhead UPer Member	Wed Sep 29 20:21:17 There is no evidence of her lying. The troll has been proven wrong and cannot accept defeat.
Cloud Strife Member	Wed Sep 29 20:27:11 I don't get it. Does Hot Rod not think 9 = 9? This really makes no sense. I also don't know why we wants to defend such a scum bag.
Madc0w Member	Wed Sep 29 20:29:04 I think his dumbass argument is that she couldn't have been the bureau chief when she just started on the job, despite the fact that she said she was a one person team.
Hot Rod Member	Wed Sep 29 20:42:48 CS - I don't get it. Does Hot Rod not think 9 = 9? Of course a 9 is a 9, just as an A is an A. CS - This really makes no sense. I also don't know why we wants to defend such a scum bag. I don't know why you want to defend the lying bitch either. MadcOw - I think his dumbass argument is that she couldn't have been the bureau chief when she just started on the job, despite the fact that she said she was a one person team. Precisely. "In 2008 its population was estimated at 57,222, making it the eighth-largest city in the state[1] and the county's population was estimated at 92,724." The only way she could be called in truth a Bureau Chief in her *VERY FIRST JOB OUT OF JOURNALISM SCHOOL* is if she started her own little business on her own tab. No one in their right mind would hire a person with that kind of title for their first job right out of school. Bureau Chief of what, herself? If she was operating on her own doing piece work then her appropriate job description is she was doing Freelance work. Ergo, she lied.
Dickhead UPer Member	Wed Sep 29 20:43:41 She didn't lie.
Hot Rod Member	Wed Sep 29 20:56:55 I made my case, now it is your turn to convince me.
miltonfriedman Member	Wed Sep 29 20:59:36 "I made my case, now it is your turn to convince me." lulz. You didn't make any case. You only provide reasons for your suspicion. You didn't make any case, you stated your opinions. Retarded ones, might I add.
Hellfire Member	Wed Sep 29 21:01:28 "I made my case, now it is your turn to convince me" Your case is that she got a job at a paper you don't know with a job that has a title that sounds important therefore it must be a lie. Great evidence. ... As opposed to a guy who has previously edited videos to misrepresent people's statements and broken the law trying to bug a government official brilliant
Hellfire Member	Wed Sep 29 21:04:13 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abbie_Boudreau Abbie Boudreau is a CNN investigative correspondent. She joined on October 15, 2007.[1] Her investigation found flaws in tires produced by Cooper Tire & Rubber Co. that caused them to recall thousands of tires.[2] She has received seven regional Emmys for investigative reporting, writing and enterprise journalism. ... She was the Dubuque bureau reporter and worked alongside Ron Steele, Rick Lipps, and Chris Kolkhorst.
Dickhead UPer Member	Wed Sep 29 21:04:44 "I made my case, now it is your turn to convince me. " You have no case. I told you to present evidence on that she is lying about her background. Let's review mine: "I was the bureau chief in Dubuque, Iowa, working as a one-man band. I shot my own video, set up my own live shots, and edited my own stories. I would bring home the police scanner to make sure the nights were quiet in this modest town along the grand Mississippi River." http://www...-Descriptions/BUREAU-CHIEF.cfm Directs and coordinates activities of personnel engaged in selecting, gathering, and editing news and news pictures in remote location or foreign country and transmitting to home office of newspaper or press syndicate: May translate dispatches into English or cable language. May perform duties of REPORTER. ---------------------------------------------- Now do you have any evidence to dispute her claims and reveal any inaccuracies about her resume? No? Then STFU. GG. Get out troll.
Hot Rod Member	Wed Sep 29 21:12:51 You get more stupid with every post, you really don't see the difference between an individual hiring an illegal with references and a packing house hiring several hundred with questionable ID. Why not change your tag to leadbrain.
miltonfriedman Member	Wed Sep 29 21:16:37 I guess if one gets called out for stupidity as often as you do, it's going to be difficult keep track of what you are being attacked for. In this thread, DUP asks you to provide evidence that the reporter is lying. Your willingness to allow Republicans to commit crimes is under attack in ANOTHER thread, molester Rod.
miltonfriedman Member	Wed Sep 29 21:21:24 btw, molester Rod, I noticed that even though you posted your response to the OTHER thread here, you are afraid to re-post the response in the correct thread. What's the matter? Running away after you couldn't troll with more lies?
Hellfire Member	Wed Sep 29 21:25:59 "You get more stupid with every post, you really don't see the difference between an individual hiring an illegal with references and a packing house hiring several hundred with questionable ID. " There really is no difference. If you are against hiring illegal immigrants you can't just tell other people they need to not do it, you need to do your own due-diligence and ascertain the legal status of all your employees. References don't count for shit when it comes to legal status to work.
Hot Rod Member	Wed Sep 29 21:29:42 Dickhead - Directs and coordinates? Herself? I do that everyday, guess that makes me my own personal Bureau Chief. Your link takes me to 'Fast Browser Search."
Dickhead UPer Member	Wed Sep 29 21:31:53 The original link is in the thread scroll up. It's easily a position to have. Just as much to say that you are your a sheriff or police chief in a very small town, because that is your job description and what you are being paid for. Anywas, this has already been covered. If you want to dwell in your own delusional world that she is some kind of liar and her resume is wrong, feel free to find any evidence to the contrary, which you have yet to do.
miltonfriedman Member	Wed Sep 29 21:31:56 "I do that everyday, guess that makes me my own personal Bureau Chief." Did you direct and coordinate snuff films like how you rape Lil' Davey and then locks him up in your crawlspace? Or how you dig up your dead mother's corpse and molest the carcass, you sick fuck?
garyd Member	Wed Sep 29 23:44:49 And Dickhead gets it completely wrong as usual. Probably why he calls himself dickhead.
Republican Rod Member	Wed Sep 29 23:45:40 garyd is never right and is a moron.
Nekran Member	Thu Sep 30 03:28:05 "If she was operating on her own doing piece work then her appropriate job description is she was doing Freelance work." Not if she got a steady pay for the work, she didn't. And if the people who decided to give her a steady pay gave her the job description of bureau chief, then that was what she was.
Hot Rod Member	Thu Sep 30 04:47:52 Who, who, who gave her a job fresh out of college and called her a Bureah Chief? Who?
Nekran Member	Thu Sep 30 04:54:12 I don't know, I said 'if'. Though throwing around meaningless fancy titles isn't uncommon in the job-market. I'll take her word over yours in any case.
Hot Rod Member	Thu Sep 30 05:00:37 I'll take common sense over what is, at best, her self-aggrandizement. "As a woman in the news industry you have to be tough. I have always had to work harder than my male counterparts to be taken seriously and to be treated with respect. As a woman in the news industry you have to ignore all of the silly talk from your managers about the clothes you should wear on-air or what color your hair should be. I have had my share of conversations like that, and to be honest, it stings. I'm left wondering, "When will my work stand on its own? Why does this always have to be part of the conversation?""
Worst Post Ever Member	Thu Sep 30 07:09:04 ^
Aeros Member	Thu Sep 30 07:14:53 At least she comes off as intelligent. This is FOX News's answer to female journalism. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ESGKpMHBSoQ
Hot Rod Member	Thu Sep 30 07:16:56 Intelligent? ""I've been a reporter for nine years." "My (FIRST OFFICIAL DAY* on the job was on 9-11." That would be September 11, 2001. This is September 28, 2010. +2010 -2001 ~~~~~ =0009 years "I was the bureau chief in Dubuque, Iowa..." She fucking lied."
Aeros Member	Thu Sep 30 07:32:14 No, looks right to me. 2010-2001= 9 years. How did she lie? Or are you senile and trying to argue that 9 =/ 9? If you are, I would suggest an immediate enrollment in Kindergarten mathematics. They teach people how to count to 10 there.
Aeros Member	Thu Sep 30 07:36:46 Ooo, maybe you are playing me smart and looking at it algebraically! Lets try that! Let X= The number of years after 2001. Since this is the year 2010, that is our sum equality. 2010 = X + 2001 -2001----2001 2010-2001=X 9=X Shit. Algebra say's you are full of crap too Rod. You should just kill yourself.
Hot Rod Member	Thu Sep 30 08:09:41 Aeros, the point is she is claiming the title of Bureau Chief on her first job out of journalism school. Try reading the thread.
KrYpToNiTe Member	Thu Sep 30 08:32:40 This is truly pathetic if you are trying to fault her because of a specific date. No one ever on their resume has been very specific with their occupational history. If that what you wanted to do, then you are out of touch or never had a resume yourself. Are you expecting people to put on their resumes this? Company A: Worked there from Jan. 10 2005 to Jan. 15 2007, I was a supervisor overseeing 13 other employees for 2 years, 735 days, 17640 hours, 1,054,080 minutes, and 63,072,000 seconds. If that is what you are seeking then every one with a job history has lied on their resume. Good job Hot Rod, you have exposed everyone with a job history has lied on how long they worked somewhere. You should immediately contact a news network, most likely Fox News because I am sure they will take you seriously, about this discovery.
Hot Rod Member	Thu Sep 30 08:36:06 Krypt, where do you dream that crap up at? That has nothing whatsoever to do with my complaint. Try reading the thread.
KrYpToNiTe Member	Thu Sep 30 08:36:23 "Aeros, the point is she is claiming the title of Bureau Chief on her first job out of journalism school. " So what? If that was her occupation, then that was her occupation. If she graduated college, see there is a position open and applies and gets it, then, what's the problem? What is your issue, no where in this thread it appears you have shown any evidence to the contrary. Except for your speculation, but as it stands it's unfounded. Should we do a google search and find positions for people fresh out of college that has something of a upper rank position? Did you even look up the qualifications for a Bureau Chief or whatever?
KrYpToNiTe Member	Thu Sep 30 08:37:38 "Krypt, where do you dream that crap up at? That has nothing whatsoever to do with my complaint." Yes it does, as you cited it multiple times as you accuse her of lying that she has been in journalism for 9 years. Are you forgetful?
Hot Rod Member	Thu Sep 30 08:38:11 I'm not going to answer the same question over and over. Try reading the thread.
KrYpToNiTe Member	Thu Sep 30 08:44:46 It doesn't matter if I read over the thread, I have. I see that you called her a liar in regards to her years as a journalist. You were proven wrong. You accused her of lying about her first position in journalism, where, and let's be house, is more creditable than you, Mr. I faked my death. You haven't shown any evidence to the contrary. Nor have you researched and admittingly so I have researched to see exactly what the qualifications for such a position would require. But everyday college graduates with their degrees do manage to obtain prestigious positions if they have the backgrounds and qualifications. It has and does happen all the time. Perhaps that you have been our of the job market for so long that you are completely out of touch. I am more inclined to believe that. Unless you have any specific citations to shed some light on her background history that she is lying. The only thing I and it appears the rest of us can conclude is that you're an idiot and obviously being a troll. Where is your disclaimer btw?
KrYpToNiTe Member	Thu Sep 30 08:45:21 honest*
Hot Rod Member	Thu Sep 30 08:58:03 Krypt - I see that you called her a liar in regards to her years as a journalist. You got that wrong. I will either accept your admission you are wrong or assume you are trolling.
KrYpToNiTe Member	Thu Sep 30 09:03:25 AB: "I've been a reporter for nine years...." You: "9-11 was *OVER* nine years ago. The bitch is lying...That would be September 11, 2001. This is September 28, 2010." Yep, looks there that you were accusing as a lia in regards to her years as a journalist. I will accept this evidence provided in this thread as your concession. No need to profess it, the information existing is damage enough.
Hot Rod Member	Thu Sep 30 09:15:27 Stop cherry pick and get your quote right. ""I've been a reporter for nine years." "My (FIRST OFFICIAL DAY* on the job was on 9-11." That would be September 11, 2001. This is September 28, 2010. +2010 -2001 ~~~~~ =0009 years "I was the bureau chief in Dubuque, Iowa..." She fucking lied." As I clearly stated, no one is given a job as Bureau Chief the first day opn the job. THAT IS THE LAST FUCKING TIME I REPEAT THAT. NOW WHERE IS YOUR ADMISSION YOU WERE WRONG, OR WERE YOU TROLLING?
KrYpToNiTe Member	Thu Sep 30 09:22:03 Rod, rod, rod. As stated before the evidence exists in this thread. You have accused her of lying about her years as a journalist. I've emphasized where you have done this. As I said before, there is no need for your professing of your concession as the information existing is damage enough. You cannot change what you've said. The text is right here. And no where did I dispute your dubious claim that you said she couldn't be a bureau chief as her first job after college. You stated that, but that doesn't mean it was factual. Evidence and other information that has been provided shows that you are incorrect with your assertion. The only thing you've done is parotted your claim, which as it stands is unfounded. The more serious matter is that you have taken away from the purpose of the OP. You have spammed and troll this thread. I am sure that you are congratulating yourself for deterring away from the fact that O'Keefe is a piece of shit. Usually though you do defend pieces of shit.
Hot Rod Member	Thu Sep 30 09:31:58 Krypt - You have accused her of lying about her years as a journalist. I've emphasized where you have done this. You are a lying son of a bitch. I just explained to you what I said. Go fuck yourself.
KrYpToNiTe Member	Thu Sep 30 09:35:01 Rod, the evidence stands in this thread. You cannot change what you've said. 1. You have to admit you have a problem. 2. Then it's denial that you have a problem. 3. It's finally acceptance. Let us know if we can assist you.
KrYpToNiTe Member	Thu Sep 30 09:36:26 My mistake 1. Denial of a problem. 2. Is admitting it. 3. Is acceptance.
Hot Rod Member	Thu Sep 30 09:42:33 As opposed to your making up lies. You lose.
KrYpToNiTe Member	Thu Sep 30 09:46:51 No lies on my end. The evidence is clear in this thread. You accused her of lying about her years being a journalist and when she started.
KrYpToNiTe Member	Thu Sep 30 09:53:13 And let's not forget your claims of her lying about having a job position that she had. And how you have not shown any evidence disputing the accuracy of that claim either. But others have show with sources that indicates she did hold that position. And let's not forget that you are a person with low morals and character who has faked their death and have made outrageous claims that have been documented over the years here on UP. So if we are going to compare who has a better track record of integrity, especially between a reporter and you, you are going to lose everytime. Now, I know that you wish you had an edit feature on this forum so you can hide what you've said, but it's too late. Nothing you can do will change the fact unless you clarify or rather admit that you were incorrect with your assertions. But that isn't the matter as you have concisely emphasized the accusation that she wasn't a journalist for 9 years. You have also made the effort to show a precise date of her years being in journalism to show that she was lying. Again, you deny this but the evidence is clear, and I've emphasized this. It is your duty to accept this or admit that you live in a life of denial. Which I am inclined to believe is something you have done for much of your life.
John Adams Member	Thu Sep 30 12:37:54 This is a very silly thread, but I am referring to its content. If you start a business you are the owner of that and if you happend to go out of business or leave that job or sell it and then you seek another occupation, it would be reasonable to define your job title as "owner" and would be acceptable, especially if you had just recently graduated from college with a business degree, though not limited to. Also it would be perfectly reasonable for a relatively small town to hire someone for a position that has the same duties as a bureau chief, especially if that position is a lone position and the title for that position is bureau chief. It would also be reasonable to accept that if she and a few other individuals had their own investigative reporting team in a town and they, through a partnership had name her a bureau chief would coincide with her duties and position as she aptly put in her bio, profile, resume, or job history statement. For this thread to have taken up the majority with posts to define and for an individual that obviously has no merits, or any other sources indicitive to reveal any fabrication on her part, is a mass consumption of valueable discussion time to focus on the real issue of the matter.
Aeros Member	Thu Sep 30 12:40:02 Which may have been Hot Rod's aim. I wonder, has FOX News covered this at all? I remember they tried to play down O'Keefe being convicted of lying to public officials too.
Rugian Member	Thu Sep 30 12:45:11 Congrats to everyone who engaged in the stupid argument over whether 9.046575342465753424657534246575342 years can be shortened to "9 years" and whether or not the title that she is documented to have had was actually her title. I don't even blame HR here, his trolling is so obvious it's hard to get angry or confused about it. I blame all of you other asshats who helped him spam the thread to near-fulfillment. When he is in this kind of mode, devote a maximum of one post to refute his claims, and then ignore him. Or better yet, refuse to respond to his posts altogether. But don't assist him in his derailment campaigns. Jesus Christ.
Aeros Member	Thu Sep 30 12:52:35 New Thread! http://www...hread=38856&time=1285869137565
John Adams Member	Thu Sep 30 12:54:19 I agree and it was obvious from the start. You can base this on the history of trifling actions before and clearly with the first sentence he wrote in this thread. It was a hook, line, and sinker and people latched onto it. I have no respect for Hot Rod at all, but more importantly, posters who wanted to have a discussion about this subject should have more respect for themselves to ignore hot rod. Hot Rod has made it clear that he wants to troll and spam and that he wants to derail discussions. This has been established. So I would suggest just ignore him. Unless he directly engages you then respond in kind.
Madc0w Member	Thu Sep 30 17:30:47 Hot Rod, she worked alone in Dubuque, thus her job title was bureau chief. She was her own boss. There is nothing to indicate this isn't true.
Adolf Hitler Member	Fri Oct 01 02:36:34 "I will lie about democrats..." - Hot Rod. Of course, this includes anyone at all he feels like deciding is a democrat
	show deleted posts

Your Name:
Your Password:
Your Message: