Utopia Talk / Politics / Trailer trash of the day

Y2A Member	Tue Oct 06 02:28:49 http://blo..._charged_for_having_child.html Woman charged for having child ride in box atop van By David Brewer October 05, 2009, 12:35PM ALBERTVILLE, AL - A Marshall County woman is in the city jail here for having her 13-year-old daughter ride in a cardboard box atop her van. Albertville Police spokesman Sgt. Jamie Smith said Jackie Denise Knott, 37, of Albertville was charged with endangering the welfare of a child. Smith said the child was turned over to a relative. Smith said police received a call Sunday morning of a minivan traveling on U.S. 431 with a large cardboard box on top with a child inside. Officers stopped the van on U.S. 431 and asked Knott why the child was riding atop her vehicle. "The box was too big to go inside the van, and she would be able to hold it down if she was inside the box," Smith said the woman told police. When asked about the child's safety, Smith said Knott told the officers that she had the box secured to the van with a clothes hanger.
Liberal Member	Tue Oct 06 04:56:51 As long as it was secured, what's the problem?
CrownRoyal Member	Tue Oct 06 05:03:43 Rod usually secures Davey, before the fondlefest.
roland Member	Tue Oct 06 05:05:49 "As long as it was secured, what's the problem? " Except it is not. If there is a crash, she would be amongst the first thing to threw off the van.
Mr Kennedy Member	Tue Oct 06 05:07:51 I read the box was secured with a coat hanger.
Mr Kennedy Member	Tue Oct 06 05:09:40 "Smith said the mother told officers it was safe because she had the box secured to the van with a clothes hanger. "
River of blood Member	Tue Oct 06 10:01:39 Let's pass 8 more pork barrel bills and spend another 100 million dollars policing mom's with vans that have boxes on top of them now. Maybe boxes should be illegal, or you should have to have a license to use a box. If all of this saves just one cracker kid's life it will be worth living in a bankrupt, 3rd world despotic police state for the rest of eternity. I'm sure libertarian Hot Rod will agree.
Mr Kennedy Member	Tue Oct 06 10:08:52 He is now pretending he doesn't know who "Hot Rod" is.
roland Member	Tue Oct 06 10:12:58 "Let's pass 8 more pork barrel bills and spend another 100 million dollars policing mom's with vans that have boxes on top of them now." Why? She is charged, didn't she?
River of blood Member	Tue Oct 06 10:16:11 I don't understand either of your replies. Who is pretending what? What does this woman being charged or not charged with anything have to do with my post?
roland Member	Tue Oct 06 10:20:11 "Who is pretending what? " That's not me, f&cktard. "What does this woman being charged or not charged with anything have to do with my post?" If she is charged, that mean there is already a law that deal with the situation. No new law is needed.
Mr Kennedy Member	Tue Oct 06 10:22:19 I was talking about hot rod since rob mentioned him by that name. "Liberal Member Sat Oct 03 13:42:38 Who is this "Hot Rod" you are talking about?"
Formerly Fred Member	Tue Oct 06 10:23:09 What exactly makes this woman "trailer trash"?
River of blood Member	Tue Oct 06 10:26:57 "If she is charged, that mean there is already a law that deal with the situation" That didn't stop her from endangering her kid. The law is NOT dealing with the situation. We need more NEW laws and more surveilance technology to ensure that nothing like this ever happens again. Stop hating freedom, Roland. "That's not me, f&cktard." I KNOW that wasn't you, assfuck.
Aeros Member	Tue Oct 06 10:28:40 She was an idiot. So Y2A naturally assumes she lives in a trailer park. Unfortunately, I have met many idiots who live in houses.
River of blood Member	Tue Oct 06 10:29:45 We could put cameras in her house, like they're doing in some places already, to catch her THINKING about putting her kid in a box on top of her van. Then have stormtroopers kick her door in and arrest before any harm can be done. Nothing is more important than the security of americans.
Aeros Member	Tue Oct 06 10:31:54 RoB, you are not allowed to ride in a motor vehicle on the public highway without 1. being inside the vehicle 2. Wearing a seat belt. Why is this so hard a concept for you to grasp?
Formerly Fred Member	Tue Oct 06 10:35:42 RoB, you are not allowed to ride in a motor vehicle on the public highway without 1. being inside the vehicle 2. Wearing a seat belt. Link? How many fucking SCHOOL BUSES have seatbelts?
River of blood Member	Tue Oct 06 10:35:43 I bet she has garage sales also where she has sold one of the tens of thousands of recalled items. Yes there's a $100,000 fine for doing this but where are the security forces to prevent her from doing this in the first place?! They should also monitor her home to see if the neighbor's kids ever come over to hang out because you're supposed to have a license for that in some states. Get this damn criminal into the system before she joins Al Qaeda.
Aeros Member	Tue Oct 06 10:36:36 Buses are excepted Fred, though some people want to change that.
Aeros Member	Tue Oct 06 10:37:03 And lay off the drugs RoB.
River of blood Member	Tue Oct 06 10:37:55 "How many fucking SCHOOL BUSES have seatbelts?" Also, how the fuck do you "inside" a motorcycle? Once again idiot Airhole speaks. Also, I've got my car right here. I don't see anyone around to stop me from getting in and driving away without my seatbelt on.
Aeros Member	Tue Oct 06 10:38:53 When you ride a motor bike, you are technically "in" it if you are on the seat. If you have someone riding on the handlebars, they are not "in" it.
Aeros Member	Tue Oct 06 10:39:51 And sure, don't wear your seatbelt. If the cops see you, you will get arrested. If you crash, you will most likely die.
Cthulhu Member	Tue Oct 06 10:40:25 'Also, I've got my car right here. I don't see anyone around to stop me from getting in and driving away without my seatbelt on. ' So what would you prefer RoB? A police state with enough troops to ensure no one gets away with even the most minor of infractions?
Formerly Fred Member	Tue Oct 06 10:40:52 So motorcycles have seatbelts? Wow.
Cthulhu Member	Tue Oct 06 10:41:00 'And sure, don't wear your seatbelt. If the cops see you, you will get arrested. If you crash, you will most likely die. ' What the punishment for no seatbelt in the US? HEre in Canada its $150 fine
Truther Member	Tue Oct 06 10:41:33 "When you ride a motor bike, you are technically "in" it if you are on the seat. If you have someone riding on the handlebars, they are not "in" it. " source?
roland Member	Tue Oct 06 10:42:28 "I KNOW that wasn't you, assfuck. " Proof? Ah... you have none.. perhaps you should go back and drink your water. "That didn't stop her from endangering her kid. " The law didn't stop all murders and rapes too, that's gotta be one of the dumbest statement you made, and you've made plenty of them. Water, anyone? "The law is NOT dealing with the situation." Then, why is she charged? " We need more NEW laws and more surveilance technology to ensure that nothing like this ever happens again. Stop hating freedom, Roland. " Lol. You called for more new laws = I hated freedom? More water, RoB?
Formerly Fred Member	Tue Oct 06 10:43:06 "And sure, don't wear your seatbelt. If the cops see you, you will get arrested." ARRESTED? Are you fucking insane?? What fucking state will ARREST you for not wearing a seat belt?? Link???
The Zero Identity Member	Tue Oct 06 10:45:04 All states that have seatbelt laws. Depending on the matter, for example, if its your 5th time being caught not wearing a seatbelt.
River of blood Member	Tue Oct 06 10:45:55 "And lay off the drugs RoB." http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,552021,00.html "Violators caught selling anything on the enormous list face fines of up to $100,000 per infraction and up to $15 million for a related series of infractions." http://www.wzzm13.com/news/news_story.aspx?storyid=114016&catid=14 "Middleville woman threatened with fines for watching neighbors' kids"
Cthulhu Member	Tue Oct 06 10:46:15 " We need more NEW laws and more surveilance technology to ensure that nothing like this ever happens again. Stop hating freedom, Roland. " So you want a 1984 society and call that freedom?
River of blood Member	Tue Oct 06 10:49:23 Roland, you've been asked to source like three different ridiculous claims you've made here. Are you going to source any of them or are you just going to keep making up stupid shit for our amusement?
Formerly Fred Member	Tue Oct 06 10:50:28 "All states that have seatbelt laws. Depending on the matter, for example, if its your 5th time being caught not wearing a seatbelt. " Bullshit. Supply your source or STFU. Thanks. (2) A second or >>>subsequent<<< offense under this section is punishable by a fine of two hundred fifty dollars ($250), And THAT is in Cali, which is probably the stiffest of all. http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d12/vc27360_5.htm
roland Member	Tue Oct 06 10:51:33 "Roland, you've been asked to source like three different ridiculous claims you've made here. Are you going to source any of them or are you just going to keep making up stupid shit for our amusement? " Aeros made the claim, dumbf&ck. More water, RoB?
River of blood Member	Tue Oct 06 10:52:08 "So you want a 1984 society and call that freedom?" Our top priority in this country is being SECURE, not being free. The government has announced this many times. If you are against our government then you are no better than a terrorist.
River of blood Member	Tue Oct 06 10:53:13 "Aeros made the claim, dumbf&ck." Oh sorry, I got my idiotfucks confused.
River of blood Member	Tue Oct 06 10:55:30 I like how Airhole ran off after I sourced my claims (that he says I'm crazy for making) to the mainstream media. Airhole, where you hiddin'?
Cthulhu Member	Tue Oct 06 10:57:51 So I take it you didn't even read what you actually wrote then RoB. " We need more NEW laws and more surveilance technology to ensure that nothing like this ever happens again. Stop hating freedom, Roland. " here you are against it. '"So you want a 1984 society and call that freedom?" Our top priority in this country is being SECURE, not being free. The government has announced this many times. If you are against our government then you are no better than a terrorist. ' here you support it. So a complete 180
xyz1 Member	Tue Oct 06 10:59:03 ^utterly fails at detecting sarcasm
Formerly Fred Member	Tue Oct 06 10:59:38 "I like how Airhole ran off after I sourced my claims " So did The Zero Identity, and Airhole never even bothered to address his stupid claim. Fucking arrested for not wearing a seat belt. ROFL
River of blood Member	Tue Oct 06 11:00:26 The level of dumb in this thread is legendary.
River of blood Member	Tue Oct 06 11:02:02 This is why I keep coming back to UP, to fuck with the retards. They're so incredibly reliable.
Formerly Fred Member	Tue Oct 06 11:02:17 yep
ehcks Member	Tue Oct 06 11:02:42 You do not own the road. While driving on it, you automatically lose certain freedoms. With having to drive at the speed limit and wear all applicable safety equipment being the "harshest" requirements, there shouldn't be a problem. You're just habitual whiners.
River of blood Member	Tue Oct 06 11:02:43 "And lay off the drugs RoB." http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,552021,00.html "Violators caught selling anything on the enormous list face fines of up to $100,000 per infraction and up to $15 million for a related series of infractions." http://www.wzzm13.com/news/news_story.aspx?storyid=114016&catid=14 "Middleville woman threatened with fines for watching neighbors' kids"
The Zero Identity Member	Tue Oct 06 11:04:40 Well, let's say you have your child not in the proper restraint, enough times, you're going to be charged with child endangerment and other "insert laws here*. As for your provice source or STFU. http://arc...24/scotus.arrest.03/index.html How limited are you really?
River of blood Member	Tue Oct 06 11:04:52 "With having to drive at the speed limit and wear all applicable safety equipment being the "harshest" requirements, there shouldn't be a problem. So we just IMAGINED the 50,000 fatal vehicle accidents last year?
ehcks Member	Tue Oct 06 11:05:36 How is that relevant? Accidents are a requirement of driving?
River of blood Member	Tue Oct 06 11:08:45 No, ehcks, the point is that those things do not prevent hundreds of thousands of fatal accidents. We need more laws and surveilance to monitor and dictate the thoughts and movements of people in order to protect them from killing themselves. Why doesn't everyone see this? Why don't you back to your cave in Afghanistan?
Truther Member	Tue Oct 06 11:08:59 It's like a retard tag team. Aeros vanishes and ehcks steps in to take his place.
River of blood Member	Tue Oct 06 11:09:18 LOL, I know.
River of blood Member	Tue Oct 06 11:10:41 What's frightening is that the reason they don't get the blatant sarcasm is because the outrageous things I'm suggesting actually DO sort of make sense to them.
River of blood Member	Tue Oct 06 11:11:42 Can't wait for the next post.
ehcks Member	Tue Oct 06 11:12:55 Why did I even try? One post in and your hyperbole machine kicks it to 11. There are bad drivers. People go too fast; merge without signaling; talk, text, eat, do makeup, get dressed, etc. while driving in busy traffic. All that needs to happen is a loss of license after that cause of accident was found. Sane drivers know that needing a seat belt, or a helmet and pads, is perfectly acceptable to use public roads.
Formerly Fred Member	Tue Oct 06 11:14:27 "Justifying a full arrest by the same quantum of evidence that justifies a traffic stop -- even though the offender cannot ultimately be imprisoned for her conduct -- defies any sense of proportionality and is in serious tension with the Fourth Amendment's proscription of unreasonable seizures," O'Connor wrote for the minority. So ONE arrest that ended up in the SC, out of tens of thousands of seat belt tickets now somehow constitutes "And sure, don't wear your seatbelt. If the cops see you, you will get arrested"???? ROFL Aeros's statement implies that you WILL be ARRESTED EVERY FUCKING TIME. GG.
River of blood Member	Tue Oct 06 11:15:14 Me: "I think we should put the entire world in shackles just to make sure nothing bad ever happens." Airhole: "You idiot, that's overkill. All we need is about HALF of the world in shackles in order to accomplish that. Stop doing drugs, RoB."
The Zero Identity Member	Tue Oct 06 11:16:54 Well my statement is not the same as his, but the point of the matter is, that is just one case, just becuase you do not hear people getting arrest for seatbelts all the god damn time or is featured in the news, does not mean sometimes are arrested for it. As sometimes people are arrested for speeding. But, ya know, people sometimes like to live in their own delusional worlds.
ehcks Member	Tue Oct 06 11:17:54 "Aeros's statement implies that you WILL be ARRESTED EVERY FUCKING TIME." Missouri state law allows a police officer to pull someone over if anyone in the car is not seat belted. But sure, you *could* break the law.
Formerly Fred Member	Tue Oct 06 11:19:07 " As sometimes people are arrested for speeding. " That's because there IS such a thing as criminal speeding. There is NO such thing as criminal non-seat belt wearing.
Formerly Fred Member	Tue Oct 06 11:19:57 "Missouri state law allows a police officer to pull someone over if anyone in the car is not seat belted. " Pulling someone over != arresting.
The Zero Identity Member	Tue Oct 06 11:21:51 Hey, believe whatever you want. But next time, just ask a cop, see what they said.
roland Member	Tue Oct 06 11:27:28 "The level of dumb in this thread is legendary. " What to you expected, you are posting here.
Truther Member	Tue Oct 06 11:51:20 So after ehcks pwns himself in this thread and the "Fish&Wildlife Service has own SWAT team" thread he vanishes into thin air with aeros. Are there any other members of the retard tag team left to step up to the plate and take ehcks place?
River of blood Member	Tue Oct 06 11:54:02 "What to you expected, you are posting here" What to I expected? Great, you're illiterate on top of everything else.
Aeros Member	Tue Oct 06 11:54:28 Airhole is in school right now getting an education, unlike some people.
Truther Member	Tue Oct 06 11:59:10 It looks like ehcks has tagged aeros back into the ring, who still hasn't provided the sources he was asked for. But he does have time to post to tell us he can't post.
Aeros Member	Tue Oct 06 12:02:31 No, I'm just on a computer in a really boring lecture about computers. And I can post hundreds of links. Which state law do you all want? I can assure you its illegal in all 50 to ride on the handlebars of a motorcycle and drive without a seat belt on.
Formerly Fred Member	Tue Oct 06 12:18:08 "And I can post hundreds of links. Which state law do you all want? I can assure you its illegal in all 50 to ride on the handlebars of a motorcycle and drive without a seat belt on. " How about just ONE that says you will be arrested every time you are caught for not wearing a seat belt.
xyz1 Member	Tue Oct 06 12:19:29 Aeros Member Tue Oct 06 12:02:31 No, I'm just on a computer in a really boring lecture about computers. Your taxpayer money at work folks. God bless welfare that allows idiots like Aeros to piss away our hard-earned cash.
Aeros Member	Tue Oct 06 12:22:08 Fred, you can be arrested for breaking any law. That does not mean they do. If you are arrested, you are held until your court date at which point you can be sentenced. If the sentence is a 150 dollar fine, you pay the fine and are released. The reason they don't do that is because it aggravates people and is too expensive to arrest everyone who does not wear a seat belt.
The Zero Identity Member	Tue Oct 06 12:26:09 Definately would overlord the court system that is already bogged down with cases. Arresting everyone who speeds or is not wearing their seatbelts would be counter-productive and more horrible public relations. But yeah, you can be arrested for it. But you know as I said earlier, some people like to live in a delusional world. So like I said freddy pie, ask a cop sometime. Or then again, stick with what you somewhat know, your 23 years of restaurant experience. And who was the person you argued with that one time regarding your notary public knowledge?
Formerly Fred Member	Tue Oct 06 12:27:11 "Fred, you can be arrested for breaking any law." Link? "If you are arrested, you are held until your court date at which point you can be sentenced." Link?
Formerly Fred Member	Tue Oct 06 12:32:12 The Zero Identity Member Tue Oct 06 11:21:51 Hey, believe whatever you want. YOU posted the link, boy. And the comment is from USSC Judge Sandra Day O'Connor. So apparently you want me to believe YOU over HER. ROFL Fucktard.
Aeros Member	Tue Oct 06 12:33:06 Dude, the whole point of granting power of arrest is they can hold you when you commit a crime. At the point of arrest, you are to be immediately arraigned by a local magistrate if they want to hold you for a time (varies by jurisidiction, nobody is uniform; generally 24-48 hours). At the arraignment hearing you can ask to be free until your court date or post bail. For a small misdemeanor, the Judge would probably tell the police to lay off and let the guy go until trial.
Formerly Fred Member	Tue Oct 06 12:35:07 " At the arraignment hearing you can ask to be free until your court date or post bail. "--airhole "If you are arrested, you are held until your court date at which point you can be sentenced."--airhole Pretty fucking serious backpedaling there son. ROFL
The Zero Identity Member	Tue Oct 06 12:35:36 You believe in alot of retarded shit. So, you don't have to take it from me. In fact you can do your own little search online, since you have the capability. Or you can sit there and deny everything, stay in your own world and ignore everything else. Ain't gonna bother me. If you want to believe that you cannot be arrested for not wearing your seatbelt. Go right ahead.
Formerly Fred Member	Tue Oct 06 12:39:19 "If you want to believe that you cannot be arrested for not wearing your seatbelt. Go right ahead. " Again, douchebag, ONE arrest out of hundreds of thousands != automatic arrest at every fucking infraction as was implied. Fucking idiot.
The Zero Identity Member	Tue Oct 06 12:45:31 And as I said, Aeros statement does not speak for me. All I was pointing out that it's possible and a reality that this occurs. Not often as reason stated already, but occurs. Fucking idiot.
Formerly Fred Member	Tue Oct 06 12:47:11 The Zero Identity Member Tue Oct 06 12:45:31 And as I said, Aeros statement does not speak for me. Then STFU and stop addressing it you stupid cuint.
River of blood Member	Tue Oct 06 12:49:55 "Airhole is in school right now getting an education, unlike some people." He should demand a refund.
Sam Adams Cat Member	Tue Oct 06 12:54:30 RoB is completely right here. Wtf is wrong with some of you people? Whats the big fucking deal anyway? If the kid had fallen off and got crushed the wheels of a juggernaut, thats nothing a little water and exercise wont sort out. Jesus christ people.
The Zero Identity Member	Tue Oct 06 12:57:51 "Formerly Fred Member Tue Oct 06 10:43:06 "And sure, don't wear your seatbelt. If the cops see you, you will get arrested." ARRESTED? Are you fucking insane?? What fucking state will ARREST you for not wearing a seat belt?? Link??? The Zero Identity Member Tue Oct 06 10:45:04 All states that have seatbelt laws. Depending on the matter, for example, if its your 5th time being caught not wearing a seatbelt. Formerly Fred Member Tue Oct 06 10:50:28 Bullshit. Supply your source or STFU. Thanks. " You're the one that wanted to carry it on. So, what know fucktard? Not my fault you can't handle reality. Please, don't let this upset you, I don't want you to "quit".
The Zero Identity Member	Tue Oct 06 13:00:39 now*
Formerly Fred Member	Tue Oct 06 13:22:56 The Zero Identity Member Tue Oct 06 10:45:04 All states that have seatbelt laws. Depending on the matter, for example, if its your 5th time being caught not wearing a seatbelt. Then post the link, boy, where you are automatically arrested on your 5th seat belt violation.
The Zero Identity Member	Tue Oct 06 13:42:25 It's stating an example as in REPEAT OFFENDERS. But it's ok fred, I understand, you don't want to live in reality. You're world with truckers, restaurant experience, and your extensive knowledge as notary is sufficient.
Formerly Fred Member	Tue Oct 06 13:47:14 The Zero Identity Member Tue Oct 06 13:42:25 It's stating an example as in REPEAT OFFENDERS. (2) A second or >>>subsequent<<< offense under this section is punishable by a fine of two hundred fifty dollars ($250), And THAT is in Cali, which is probably the stiffest of all. http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d12/vc27360_5.htm You do know what subsequent means? An arrest is not required to impose a $250 fine. Idiot. And you STILL haven't posted a supporting link. ROFL
Formerly Fred Member	Tue Oct 06 13:49:55 The Zero Identity Member Tue Oct 06 10:45:04 All states that have seatbelt laws. Depending on the matter, for example, if its your 5th time being caught not wearing a seatbelt. Then post the link, boy, where you are automatically arrested on your 5th seat belt violation. Still waiting on the linky, choad man.
The Zero Identity Member	Tue Oct 06 13:55:35 Right, it is not required fuckhead, as it the police officer does NOT have to make an arrest, however, he has the legal authority to do so. The cop can use his discretion. I posted for you a link specificy an incident where it is allowed to arrest for such minor offenses. So you post me something that says police CANNOT arrest ANYONE for a seatbelt violation, or a speeding violation. Are you aware that you don't have to be arrested for possession of pot either as cops use their fucking discretion? Meaning if you get pulled over and you have pot depending on the cop and how you are responding to the cop he may just tell you to toss it and watch you destroy it instead of arresting you. Unless you want to argue and show in someway that he is REQUIRED to make the arrest? Same fucking principle really to the seatbelt situation. Police are not going to arrest everyone for seatbelt violation, because, FUCKHEAD, as stated before it would be bad public relations, the court system would be overloaded, just the same as why speeders do not get arrested all the time, BUT can be arrested for speeding. And yes, there is a criminal offense, but most cities treat it as a civil infract so you wont have an influx of people in court and jails for merely speeding. But alas, this premise proves to be out of you cognition as well. So there isn't really any way else to put it, I can show you an article for osmeone else getting arrested for a seatbelt offense, but it wouldn't matter as you would carry on this fucking idiotic notion that this does not occur, which is CLEARY WHAT YOU ARE IMPLYING. You fucking dipshit. I swear you aand HR are meant for each other AND ON THAT NOTE. I support.
The Zero Identity Member	Tue Oct 06 14:24:08 "however, he has the legal authority to do so DEPENDING ON THE CIRCUMSTANCES. The cop can use his discretion." To reiterate.
The Zero Identity Member	Tue Oct 06 14:27:41 Come on "cook", you want to continue this embarrassment?
The Zero Identity Member	Tue Oct 06 14:33:02 Just to repeat as I pour salt in your wounds: "In a 5-4 ruling, the court said a Lago Vista, Texas, police officer did not violate Gail Atwater's Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizure when he arrested and handcuffed her for not wearing a seat belt...Atwater and her two children were on their way home from a soccer practice when the officer stopped her pickup truck because he noticed none of them were wearing seat belts...The officer arrested Atwater, cuffed her hands behind her back, and took her to the city police station, where she was photographed and held in a cell by herself for about an hour before she posted a $310 bond. A friend took care of her children. She later pleaded no contest to the seat belt charge and paid a $50 fine." GG "cook".
ehcks Member	Tue Oct 06 14:36:01 So, what you're saying is, that a police officer can choose to arrest someone who is breaking the law? Inconceivable.
Formerly Fred Member	Tue Oct 06 14:38:15 The Zero Identity Member Tue Oct 06 13:55:35 Right, it is not required fuckhead, as it the police officer does NOT have to make an arrest, Well there ya go. Nice self-pwnage dickwad. ROFL RIP GG.
The Zero Identity Member	Tue Oct 06 14:38:35 Yeah, fucking insane isn't? Unless certain phrases or keyword is in the law.
Formerly Fred Member	Tue Oct 06 14:39:29 ROFL RIP GG.
Formerly Fred Member	Tue Oct 06 14:39:39 ROFL RIP GG.
Formerly Fred Member	Tue Oct 06 14:39:45 ROFL RIP GG.
Formerly Fred Member	Tue Oct 06 14:39:50 ROFL RIP GG.
	show deleted posts