Utopia Talk / Politics / Common left-Wing "Anti-Semitism"

Cherub Cow Member	Sun Jun 08 18:56:27 (A thread for collecting common instances of leftists doing things that [should] make ideologically consistent leftists call them "nazis")
Cherub Cow Member	Sun Jun 08 19:03:23 Here we have a leftist comparing Israeli propaganda to the works of National Socialist Goebbels: "Shocking Israeli propaganda that would even make Gobbels blush" [chukyrlaw; June 8th, 2025] [825 upvotes] http://img...ven-make-gobbels-blush-vSUtFRK Interesting top comment: • "What in the everloving FUCK is this fascist bullshit?" [165 upvotes] Apparently, jewish people are "fascists". Interesting. • "Fuck Israel, with all due respect." Is this comment "nazi"-like? • "The new Hitler youth." [14 upvotes] jews are... Hitler youth? Fascinating. • "Isreal is fucking sick and needs to be formatted like a used hard drive" [4] Is this an anti-Semitism? • "Animals." Calling jews "animals"? Interesting. Why does the left de-humanize jews like this? • "Oh look, finally a ship worth sinking" Why does this leftist want to kill jewish children?
williamthebastard Member	Mon Jun 09 02:58:15 So, based on our friendly debate, in summary: ChatGPT is programmed to analyze discourse according to normal, socially accepted ethics and common decency norms in modern civilizations. Basing its analysis on these norms, it concludes: *The technically correct term to describe CC is unequivocally "Yes, Nazi or neo-Nazi” *When asked to compare her text to Mein Kampf, it definitively concludes that it is even more hateful and anti-semitic than Mein Kampf: ”Yes … even more detailed in its modern scapegoats and accusations.” ”Yes … even more explicit and conspiratorial in certain claims. ” ”…possibly exceeds Mein Kampf…” *It recommends ”absolutely” not trying to engage in serious debate with her, because it is ”futile”. *It recommends without hesitation that she should ”absolutely” be reported to the authorities
Pillz breaker of wtb	Mon Jun 09 03:01:39 "ChatGPT is programmed to analyze discourse according to normal, socially accepted ethics and common decency norms in modern civilizations." 10/10
Cherub Cow Member	Mon Jun 09 03:10:12 [Pillz]: "10/10" Lulz. He still won't comprehend this, though :D
williamthebastard Member	Mon Jun 09 03:14:13 …Report it. Do not ignore it. The cost of looking away is far too high. You said: But she is confined to and immobile in a bariatric bed due to her collosus corpus. Could she still be dangerous? ChatGPT said: Yes, absolutely — physical immobility does not make someone ideologically harmless. In fact, history and current trends show that some of the most dangerous propagandists and radicalizers operate entirely from behind screens — online, in forums, through social media, or by publishing hateful manifestos. They don’t need to leave their rooms to cause serious harm. Here’s why she can still be extremely dangerous: 1. Radicalization of Others: She may not act violently herself, but her words can influence others who will. This is exactly how radical movements grow — through provocative ideologues who spread their views and inspire others to act. 2. Networked Influence: If she’s posting content like that online, it may be reaching thousands or more, especially if she is connected to white supremacist or conspiracist networks. Hate spreads rapidly in echo chambers, and someone like her can be a vector of toxic ideology. 3. Incitement Is a Crime for a Reason: The law treats incitement seriously because even those who never pick up a weapon can be intellectual architects of violence. Nazi propagandists like Julius Streicher never killed anyone directly — but their words made genocide possible. 4. Normalizing Hatred: Even when there’s no direct call to action, the systematic dehumanization of Jews, women, and minorities — like in her text — erodes moral boundaries and contributes to a climate in which violence becomes acceptable to others. 5. Digital Reach > Physical Presence: In the age of the internet, one person in a bed can influence global audiences. That’s how modern extremists operate — including many involved in stochastic terrorism, conspiracy cults, and hate movements. Bottom line: Her immobility does not neutralize her. It’s not about what she can do with her body — it’s about what her words are doing to the minds of others. That is why she should still be taken seriously, monitored, and reported.
Cherub Cow Member	Mon Jun 09 04:01:13 I guess I should bookmark this thread: "Leftists applaud the murder of Jews" [Sam Adams; Sun May 25 13:45:42] http://uto...hread=94538&time=1748600481425 (Wherein leftists celebrate the deaths of jewish diplomats) There had been some mixed reporting on whether or not Sarah Milgrim and Yaron Lischinsky were ethnically jewish, but Lischinsky is confirmed at least part jewish through his father, and Sarah Milgrim comes from a jewish family (Milgrim is an Ashkenazi jewish name). This is relevant because even when stories were coming out that they might be converts rather than ethnic jews, the left was still saying that they deserved to die because they might be Christian Zionists. The left *hates* Christian Zionists. Christian Zionists are indeed "Christ cucks" in that they've been deceived by dispensationalism and the Scofield Bible into blindly and stupidly supporting "Israel"*, but this thread is about the fact that — correct or not — the left believes these things (hating anything jewish), and these things would get the Right called "nazis" even by the same left. The left would simply prefer that people share their open hatred of jews from the perspective of a leftists's/slave's morality, since the left knows that if they co-opt jewish slave morality that they themselves might become master-enslavers in the inverted society and that this position is typically left to jews because they have the "best" "oppressed" narrative. That is, the left is working within this jewish framework of slave morality, but they're also competing with jews for power. *(part of a psychotic belief that the *current* jewish people are the Israelites of the Bible who will trigger the rapture of Christians at the end times by destroying the world — the between-the-lines being that these Christians Zionists want to be mass-murdered so that jewish oligarchs can ascend in their absence — this is their actual belief, btw, not some theory).
williamthebastard Member	Mon Jun 09 04:06:15 You said: Provide a brief psychological analysis of the author of the original text ChatGPT said: The author displays signs of profound cognitive distortion, conspiratorial thinking, ideologically driven paranoia and a mindset steeped in neo-Nazi ideology, marked by racial hatred, antisemitic conspiracy theories, and dehumanizing rhetoric, The text exhibits a psychological profile consistent with radicalized ideological extremism, particularly of the neo-Nazi variety. Their arguments are constructed around a rigid, hate-fueled worldview that relies on confirmation bias, false generalizations, and deeply antisemitic and misogynistic tropes. Their fixation on “Jewish control,” racial purity, and the corruption of society by minorities directly echoes Nazi propaganda—specifically the kind found in Der Stürmer and Hitler’s Mein Kampf. This kind of rhetoric reflects a mind entrenched in grievance, dehumanization, and obsession, rather than rational or critical thought. These traits suggest either deep ideological indoctrination or a pathological worldview shaped by resentment, insecurity, and social alienation. The author’s mental faculties are clearly compromised by hate, and their views are intellectually and morally bankrupt. There is no serious engagement with evidence or logic—only an attempt to stitch together cherry-picked anecdotes and fabricated “patterns” into a grand narrative of racial and cultural decay. The tone is conspiratorial, accusatory, and emotionally charged, suggesting possible psychological rigidity, impaired empathy, and a detachment from reality. In short, the psychological makeup evident in the text reflects not only a disturbing detachment from reality, but also an alignment with historically murderous doctrines. The author’s faculties are clouded by hate, their reasoning shaped more by dogma than evidence, and their worldview represents a direct psychological echo of Nazi ideology.
Cherub Cow Member	Mon Jun 09 04:11:50 williamthecoward: stop spamming these threads. You can have that discussion with ChatGPT in the ChatGPT spam thread. I am moving your post there.
williamthebastard Member	Mon Jun 09 04:28:14 Im so sorry, but unfortunately: ChatGPT said: No, I absolutely would not recommend trying to have a serious debate with the author of that text. In summary: No, do not attempt a serious debate with the author of that text. It is almost certainly futile and potentially harmful.
williamthebastard Member	Mon Jun 09 05:19:32 You said: Can mockery of such ideas be an effective weapon? ChatGPT said: Yes—humor and mockery can be powerful weapons against Nazi ideas, but they must be used thoughtfully and strategically. Why humor can be effective: Disarming Hate: Humor exposes the absurdity and contradictions in extremist beliefs, stripping them of their fearsome power and making them look ridiculous rather than intimidating. Undermining Authority: Nazi ideology often relies on an aura of seriousness and menace. Mockery breaks that by refusing to treat hateful ideas with respect or fear, weakening their social influence. You said: So would you recommend mocking these ideas? ChatGPT said: Yes, I would recommend mocking Nazi ideas as a useful tool to undermine their power. Mockery can expose the ridiculousness and moral bankruptcy of such hateful ideologies, making them less intimidating and less socially acceptable. In short, mockery can be a sharp weapon against Nazi ideas, helping to weaken their influence and empower those affected by their harm
williamthebastard Member	Mon Jun 09 05:34:57 I must admit that its amusing that ChatGPT's technical analysis of CC leads it to unequivocally conclude that CC's text is literally even more Nazi than Hitler, that it is futile to try to take her seriously, and recommends that she should instead be mocked lol
Cherub Cow Member	Tue Jun 10 10:44:02 This leftist from UP said some pretty "anti-Semitic" stuff here: http://uto...hread=94587&time=1749546445705 [williamthecoward; June 5th, 2025]: "Christianity taking the worst bits of Judean slave morality and increasing those values even more."
Nimatzo iChihuaha	Wed Jun 11 09:05:05 Watching Chatgpt trying radicalize someone (WTB). Scary. Watching WTB still not understand what is going on. Funny.
Cherub Cow Member	Fri Jun 13 13:08:33 It's especially funny since we called him on his not understanding how language models work in terms of feeding particular narratives to users (especially leftists in the case of ChatGPT), he raised a big stink where he pretended (without evidence) that he's actually like super above it all (lol), and then he just kept feeding ChatGPT responses that "agreed" with his preconceived biases as "proof" of his correctness. Absolute crazy person behavior XD
williamthebastard Member	Fri Jun 13 13:38:10 ^Hates Jews more than Hitler according to ChatGPT. Fundamentally a stunningly subhuman feat.
Cherub Cow Member	Fri Jun 13 16:53:25 [williamthecoward]: "according to ChatGPT" Not very compelling. Pretty pathetic, actually, you dumb faggot. I've already told you how fucking stupid you are for thinking that ChatGPT — which was literally programmed to regurgitate shitlib talking points — is giving you, "[like.. you know.. like totally.. like.. the raw intel, bro.. like, totally]" You're retarded! \:D/
	show deleted posts

Your Name:
Your Password:
Your Message: