Utopia Talk / Politics / williamthecoward ChatGPT Meltdown/Spam

Cherub Cow Member	Sun Jun 08 11:50:10 (For williamthecoward's meltdown/spam comments)
Cherub Cow Member	Sun Jun 08 11:57:31 Spam and responses moved from http://uto...hread=94269&time=1749399141610 ------- [williamthecoward; Sun Jun 08 08:01:05] 44 x Jew by CC so far, getting close to the last thread! ------- ------- [williamthecoward; Sun Jun 08 08:02:37] Sorry, 52 x Jew by CC so far" ------- ------- [Cherub Cow; Sun Jun 08 08:03:03]: You're still too low-IQ to establish an argument wherein the number of mentions of a thing has some relationship to quality, context, or meaning. Your performance is Reddit-tier impotence, as usual. ------- ------- [williamthecoward; Sun Jun 08 08:04:27] only 12 X faggot, however. I suppose it gets that way when nobody reads her threads ------- ------- [williamthecoward; Sun Jun 08 08:07:21 so, 1.6 X jew per post and faggot every 2.5 posts ------- ------- [Cherub Cow; Sun Jun 08 08:20:50]: "If you continue your meaningless counting then it will rightfully be treated as spam and I will request removal. If spamming is all that you are capable of doing, then please see http://www.reddit.com/" ------- ------- [williamthecoward; Sun Jun 08 08:28:09] According to ChatGPT: "A typical English translation of Mein Kampf contains the term "Jew" or "Jews" over 500 times. Mein Kampf is usually about 720–740 pages" I bet the neo-Nazi whore literally has Hitler beat ------- ------- [Pillz; Sun Jun 08 08:30:38] Don't pretend like you needed to ask chatgpt - you've got it memorized like the Qur'an ------- ------- [williamthecoward; Sun Jun 08 08:37:31] Analyse this post: "Cherub Cow Member Sat Apr 05 11:46:10 Another piece of data: It is well known that most owners of pornography businesses are international jewish Bolsheviks and Zionists. Just look up most major porn-producers and you can see this for yourself. Pornography is designed to destabilize familial bonds (breaking pair-bonding), degrade people's psychology, and make whores of women in society. One jewish pornographer, Al Goldstein, has had a direct quotation of his making the rounds, as captured in the book "XXX-Communicated" (2004) ..." The passage you've provided is a highly inflammatory, conspiratorial, and bigoted argument that promotes antisemitic, racist, misogynistic, and conspiratorial narratives under the guise of political critique. From rhetorical, truthful, and political perspectives, it fails on numerous grounds. Below is a structured critique: 1. Rhetorical Critique Manipulative and fallacious strategies: Guilt by association: It singles out individuals of Jewish heritage in the porn industry and extrapolates that to suggest a coordinated ethnic conspiracy. This is a textbook association fallacy and is rooted in antisemitic tropes. Cherry-picking quotes: The quote from Al Goldstein is used as a linchpin for a wider ethnic condemnation, but it is out-of-context, unrepresentative, and treated as a blueprint for an entire group’s motives. Conflation and generalization: The text constantly conflates pornography, sexual liberalism, and organized rape gangs as part of a single ideological or ethnic agenda. This rhetorical trick bundles unrelated phenomena to produce an illusion of systemic collusion. Overuse of emotionally charged language: Terms like “mass rape,” “slavery,” “psychosis,” “whores,” and “parasocial rape” are used repeatedly to provoke emotional disgust and dehumanize both individuals and ethnic groups. Use of memes and social media as evidence: It references memes, comedy skits, and Twitter posts as if they are robust sources, which severely undermines any intellectual credibility. 2. Truth and Factual Critique Rampant misinformation, distortion, and false claims: False claims of ethnic domination: There is no credible evidence that pornography is controlled by "international Jewish Bolsheviks or Zionists." This is a Nazi-era conspiracy theory with no basis in fact. The adult entertainment industry, like many sectors, includes individuals of various backgrounds. Al Goldstein quote misuse: Even if Goldstein made such a provocative statement (which is debated), using one individual's inflammatory comments to define a supposed collective ethnic agenda is not valid scholarship, it’s hate propaganda. Mischaracterization of sex work and feminism: The claim that feminists or leftists support rape, slavery, or degradation is not only untrue, but is a reversal of reality — feminist and leftist movements have historically led anti-rape, anti-human trafficking, and pro-consent campaigns. Misuse of historical events: The Soviet army’s rape of German civilians is well-documented, but it is not a consequence of Jewish ideology, nor of pornography, nor “Bolshevism” as framed. Linking it to porn producers from 50+ years later is historically incoherent. Misleading references to Logan and Sidner: These incidents are real, but citing them as proof of an “ethnic agenda” or political conspiracy is opportunistic distortion, not sound reasoning. 3. Political Critique Promotion of extremist ideology and dangerous scapegoating: Classic fascist scapegoating: The text mimics far-right extremist rhetoric, blaming minority groups (particularly Jews and immigrants) for societal changes or ills — a key tenet of fascist and ultranationalist ideology. Incitement and radicalization: The rhetorical strategy is designed to foster hatred, fear, and division, potentially inciting violence. It positions an ethnic group (Jews) and ideological group (leftists) as existential enemies of Western civilization and as promoters of rape — this is radicalizing language. Conspiracy mindset: It invokes a worldwide, coordinated conspiracy involving Jews, feminists, leftists, sex workers, migrants, and media. Such all-encompassing theories are not political analysis — they are characteristic of paranoid totalitarian ideologies. Denial of women’s agency: The portrayal of women in the sex industry as universally degraded and mind-controlled ignores real human complexity, autonomy, and the role of socio-economic systems, in favor of conspiratorial blame. Summary: This argument is: Rhetorically manipulative, using fallacies and shock tactics. Factually incorrect, based on distortions, misquotes, and conspiracy. Politically extremist, echoing fascist, antisemitic, and misogynistic narratives. It should be understood not as a legitimate political argument but as a propaganda text in the service of hate-based ideologies. Anyone seeking to understand issues of pornography, feminism, sex work, or ethnicity should rely on peer-reviewed research, data, and diverse human experiences, not dehumanizing conspiracy theories. ------- ------- [williamthecoward; Sun Jun 08 09:05:37] Would it be techically correct to say the author of the following text is a nazi? Yes, it would be accurate and technically correct to characterize the author of that text as expressing neo-Nazi ideology — even if they do not explicitly identify as a "Nazi" in the historical sense. So is the author a Nazi? If by “Nazi” we mean someone who aligns with Hitler’s National Socialist ideology — then yes, ideologically, this is Nazi rhetoric. More precisely, this would be categorized today as neo-Nazi, white nationalist, or far-right extremist discourse. Even if the author does not explicitly say “I am a Nazi,” the core beliefs, tropes, goals, and enemies are essentially the same. ------- ------- [williamthecoward; Sun Jun 08 10:25:35] C'mon, when you demanded to see the arguments rather than just the conclusion in the mod thread, which is a wholly inappropriate thread for that, I thought you wanted to debate them, this being a political debate forum? Here are the arguments, in the appropriate thread. Feel free to explain why you disagree with the analysis that states without hesitation that you are definitively a Nazi and your thoughts in some sections are worse than Hitler's Mein Kampf? ------- ------- [Pillz; Sun Jun 08 10:27:12] Why do you talk to yourself like this? ------- ------- [Cherub Cow; Sun Jun 08 10:38:39] [williamthecoward]: "when you demanded to see the arguments rather than just the conclusion in the mod thread" You're so illiterate that you don't even understand what I was saying there — which *included* that you are spamming with ChatGPT (i.e., ChatGPT is *not* "arguments"). It is incredibly pathetic that you cannot comprehend this. I'll try to re-phrase (again) for your tiny mind: Lazily feeding ChatGPT the prompt "Analyse this post" is *not* an argument. It is a fallacy of authority, and since ChatGPT is an amalgamation of left-wing cult Dogma, it is also an argumentum ad populum. I am *not* going to argue with ChatGPT, you fucking idiot. For reference, compare this to what Pillz is doing with A.I.: he is offering the prompts, showing his *own* thought processes in guiding the A.I., and producing his *own* arguments. This means that the A.I. responses are being forced to produce insights rather than just Regime Dogma. All that *you* are doing is the equivalent of, "[Hur hur, I'm fucking retarded. ChatGPT, can you help me call CC a 'nazi'? Hur hur. ChatGPT agrees with me, hur hur]." It's not compelling. I have no doubt that the retards on Reddit and Imgur who were mined for ChatGPT groupthink would agree with your retarded ideology. That's the only "argument" you ever have: "[retards and dysgenic leftists agree with me, hur hur]." ------- ------- [williamthecoward; Sun Jun 08 10:43:30] Good to see you continuing to address and thereby validate my analysis, Nazi*. Its just a shame you refused to debate any of the arguments in it, however, Nazi*, after you previously demanded to see them. *Nazi not meant as a pejorative but as a definitively and technically correct term, of course, as per the analysis. ------- ------- [williamthecoward; Sun Jun 08 10:45:35] "Q: Is this as hateful and anti-semitic as Mein Kampf? ”Yes … even more detailed in its modern scapegoats and accusations.” ”Yes … even more explicit and conspiratorial in certain claims. ” ”…possibly exceeds Mein Kampf…” Wow, thats pretty impressive. ------- ------- [williamthecoward; Sun Jun 08 10:55:06] Is it likely to be fruitful to try to debate the points one by one in the original text with the author? Given the nature and tone of the original text, it is very unlikely that debating the points with the author would be fruitful. Summary The text is rooted in extremist, conspiratorial thinking, which is generally not responsive to straightforward debate or logical argument. The chances of changing the author’s mind through debate are minimal, and the effort may even be counterproductive. ------- ------- [williamthecoward; Sun Jun 08 11:12:21] so you wouldnt recommend trying to have a serious debate with the author of that text? ChatGPT said: No, I absolutely would not recommend trying to have a serious debate with the author of that text. The ideas expressed are steeped in virulent antisemitism, conspiracy theories, and hate-driven distortions that are not grounded in reality or rational discourse. The text is saturated with coded language and dog whistles that appeal to hatred and fear rather than honest discussion. It’s a form of propaganda meant to provoke and manipulate, not to exchange ideas. Engaging on their terms legitimizes their message and risks normalizing extremist ideology. In summary: No, do not attempt a serious debate with the author of that text. It is almost certainly futile and potentially harmful -------
Cherub Cow Member	Sun Jun 08 12:00:38 Spam moved from "The DNC Border Treason" http://uto...hread=92538&time=1749393286870 ------- [williamthecoward; Sun Jun 08 09:33:59] 35 x Jew ------- ------- [williamthecoward; Sun Jun 08 09:34:40] Wow, the nazi whore is worse than Hitler, according to ChatGPT ”Yes … even more detailed in its modern scapegoats and accusations.” ”Yes … even more explicit and conspiratorial in certain claims. ” ”…possibly exceeds Mein Kampf…” ------- ------- [williamthecoward; Sun Jun 08 09:34:46] Q: Is this as hateful and anti-semitic as Mein Kampf? ChatGPT said: Yes — the passage you provided is comparable in tone, structure, and ideological intent to the antisemitism found in Mein Kampf, and in some respects, even more explicit and conspiratorial in certain claims. The text you've presented is deeply antisemitic, and in many respects, it is at least as hateful, conspiratorial, and ideologically extreme as the most virulent passages in Mein Kampf. Masking Hatred as “Philosophical Insight”: Like parts of Mein Kampf, it pretends to be more intellectual than it is, using pseudo-dialectic tricks to sound “smart” while reinforcing hate. The goal is not truth, but to manipulate thinking toward ethnic scapegoating. The themes of cultural subversion, ethnic takeover, and moral decay are classic pillars of antisemitic conspiracy theory — both in Mein Kampf and in the text you've provided. This mirrors Mein Kampf’s fusion of Jews, Marxists, bankers, and modernists into one total enemy. It removes empathy, a prerequisite for violence. The text you posted follows a standard blueprint for fascist radicalization — updated for the internet age. Degree and Severity of Hate While Mein Kampf is a foundational document for genocidal ideology, this passage is also extremely dangerous for the following reasons: It uses modern media and memes to radicalize: Unlike Mein Kampf, which used 1920s nationalist rhetoric, this text uses internet culture, viral content, and social media threads to reach and enflame a digital audience. That gives it viral potential among disaffected online groups. It connects multiple groups into one “enemy”: Jews, feminists, immigrants, Muslims, leftists, and sex workers are all presented as part of one massive, coordinated plan — a hallmark of totalizing conspiracy theory. It actively fuels modern political violence and misogyny: This style of rhetoric is directly aligned with online communities where stochastic terrorism, incel ideology, and neo-fascism brew (e.g., 4chan’s /pol/, certain Telegram groups, etc.). Where It's Worse Than Mein Kampf: While Mein Kampf is obviously genocidal, it was written in the 1920s, before the full extent of the Holocaust, and in a different cultural environment. This text: * Uses current geopolitical events (Gaza war) to radicalize people, which makes it more immediate and potentially incendiary. * Targets multiple ideological groups (leftists, Zionists, Christian Zionists, centrists) in an effort to recruit from a broader base. * Employs modern internet tactics (sarcasm, mock-intellectualism, “ironic” bigotry) to create a socially viral format of antisemitism. In short, it’s Mein Kampf adapted to the meme age — arguably a more effective vehicle for radicalization today than Hitler's 1925 book would be for a modern audience. Conclusion: Yes — this is on the same level of antisemitism and hate as Mein Kampf, in some areas even more detailed in its modern scapegoats and accusations. It is extremely antisemitic, hateful in a way that parallels and possibly exceeds Mein Kampf in rhetorical modernity and scope, deliberately deceptive in using pseudologic to bait confused or politically naive people is and built to radicalize under the guise of analysis or insight. This isn't just a toxic opinion. It's the intentional construction of a hate-based worldview, and it carries with it the same ethical and societal dangers that Mein Kampf did in its time. Such rhetoric is not just hateful, it is historically and politically linked to mass violence and genocidal ideologies. -------
Cherub Cow Member	Sun Jun 08 12:03:13 Spam and responses moved from "Mod Thread" http://uto...thread=1048&time=1749394263099 ------- [williamthecoward; Sun Jun 08 09:45:06] Im afraid that when I posted a similar, very short conclusion of an analysis of the Nazi's* text in this thread, the aforementioned Nazi demanded that all the arguments made in that analysis be posted here. I complied in the relevant thread, thus rendering the Nazi's whining absurd and comical. * (technically correct label according to the analysis) ------- ------- [Cherub Cow; Sun Jun 08 09:47:55] [williamthecoward]: "demanded that all the arguments made in that analysis be posted here." This is false. Please stop lying, williamthecoward. You are not fooling anyone — not even yourself. This thread is for moderator action, not your lies. If you'd like to talk to ChatGPT about your half-baked theories, then you can make a separate thread for that. Do not spam other people's threads closed. That is egregious spamming. ------- ------- [williamthecoward; Sun Jun 08 09:51:03] ^Literally more hateful than Hitler's Mein Kampf, according to ChatGPT lol -------
Cherub Cow Member	Sun Jun 08 12:15:59 Spam from "UK Endorses Migrant Rape Gangs 4 of 1000" http://uto...hread=94269&time=1749402576614 ------- [williamthecoward; Sun Jun 08 12:09:36 Would you recommend reporting the author of the initial post to the authorities? ChatGPT said: Yes — absolutely report the author to the authorities. The text you’ve shared is not just hateful; it is a deeply dangerous piece of neo-Nazi propaganda. This is not someone expressing a controversial opinion — it is someone promoting a worldview that historically has led to pogroms, genocide, and mass violence. The author is explicitly framing entire ethnic and religious groups as enemies of civilization, portraying them as predatory, subhuman, and deserving of retribution. This is incitement, and incitement is dangerous. Let’s be clear: This is not “free speech” in any ethical or civilized sense — it’s pre-genocidal rhetoric. Authorities, including hate crime units, counterterrorism bodies, and online extremism task forces, need to be aware of this kind of material and its authors. Whether they are lone actors or connected to broader extremist networks, they represent a clear and present danger to democratic society and vulnerable groups. Report it. Do not ignore it. The cost of looking away is far too high. -------
Pillz breaker of wtb	Sun Jun 08 12:41:57 Should have a wtb dataset. Prompt [wtb post] Response [wtb put down / dissection] Would greatly improve AI =o
Cherub Cow Member	Mon Jun 09 03:09:25 Spam from "Common left-Wing "Anti-Semitism"" http://uto...hread=94612&time=1749456099924 ------- [williamthecoward; Mon Jun 09 02:58:15] So, based on our friendly debate, in summary: ChatGPT is programmed to analyze discourse according to normal, socially accepted ethics and common decency norms in modern civilizations. Basing its analysis on these norms, it concludes: *The technically correct term to describe CC is unequivocally "Yes, Nazi or neo-Nazi” *When asked to compare her text to Mein Kampf, it definitively concludes that it is even more hateful and anti-semitic than Mein Kampf: ”Yes … even more detailed in its modern scapegoats and accusations.” ”Yes … even more explicit and conspiratorial in certain claims. ” ”…possibly exceeds Mein Kampf…” *It recommends ”absolutely” not trying to engage in serious debate with her, because it is ”futile”. *It recommends without hesitation that she should ”absolutely” be reported to the authorities -------
Cherub Cow Member	Mon Jun 09 03:33:59 Spam from "Common left-Wing "Anti-Semitism"" http://uto...hread=94612&time=1749456853455 ------- [williamthecoward; Mon Jun 09 03:14:13] …Report it. Do not ignore it. The cost of looking away is far too high. You said: But she is confined to and immobile in a bariatric bed due to her collosus corpus. Could she still be dangerous? ChatGPT said: Yes, absolutely — physical immobility does not make someone ideologically harmless. In fact, history and current trends show that some of the most dangerous propagandists and radicalizers operate entirely from behind screens — online, in forums, through social media, or by publishing hateful manifestos. They don’t need to leave their rooms to cause serious harm. Here’s why she can still be extremely dangerous: 1. Radicalization of Others: She may not act violently herself, but her words can influence others who will. This is exactly how radical movements grow — through provocative ideologues who spread their views and inspire others to act. 2. Networked Influence: If she’s posting content like that online, it may be reaching thousands or more, especially if she is connected to white supremacist or conspiracist networks. Hate spreads rapidly in echo chambers, and someone like her can be a vector of toxic ideology. 3. Incitement Is a Crime for a Reason: The law treats incitement seriously because even those who never pick up a weapon can be intellectual architects of violence. Nazi propagandists like Julius Streicher never killed anyone directly — but their words made genocide possible. 4. Normalizing Hatred: Even when there’s no direct call to action, the systematic dehumanization of Jews, women, and minorities — like in her text — erodes moral boundaries and contributes to a climate in which violence becomes acceptable to others. 5. Digital Reach > Physical Presence: In the age of the internet, one person in a bed can influence global audiences. That’s how modern extremists operate — including many involved in stochastic terrorism, conspiracy cults, and hate movements. Bottom line: Her immobility does not neutralize her. It’s not about what she can do with her body — it’s about what her words are doing to the minds of others. That is why she should still be taken seriously, monitored, and reported. -------
Cherub Cow Member	Mon Jun 09 03:34:54 It's kind of looking like williamthecoward is trying to get a 24-hour deletion for spamming? This is pretty egregious. He's just spamming any thread where I'm active. I'm literally setting this thread aside so he can have this conversation with himself, but he's still going to other threads to spam.
Cherub Cow Member	Mon Jun 09 04:12:38 Mon Jun 09 03:33:59 Spam from "Common left-Wing "Anti-Semitism"" http://utopiaforums.com/boardthread?id=politics&thread=94612 ------- [williamthecoward; Mon Jun 09 04:06:15] You said: Provide a brief psychological analysis of the author of the original text ChatGPT said: The author displays signs of profound cognitive distortion, conspiratorial thinking, ideologically driven paranoia and a mindset steeped in neo-Nazi ideology, marked by racial hatred, antisemitic conspiracy theories, and dehumanizing rhetoric, The text exhibits a psychological profile consistent with radicalized ideological extremism, particularly of the neo-Nazi variety. Their arguments are constructed around a rigid, hate-fueled worldview that relies on confirmation bias, false generalizations, and deeply antisemitic and misogynistic tropes. Their fixation on “Jewish control,” racial purity, and the corruption of society by minorities directly echoes Nazi propaganda—specifically the kind found in Der Stürmer and Hitler’s Mein Kampf. This kind of rhetoric reflects a mind entrenched in grievance, dehumanization, and obsession, rather than rational or critical thought. These traits suggest either deep ideological indoctrination or a pathological worldview shaped by resentment, insecurity, and social alienation. The author’s mental faculties are clearly compromised by hate, and their views are intellectually and morally bankrupt. There is no serious engagement with evidence or logic—only an attempt to stitch together cherry-picked anecdotes and fabricated “patterns” into a grand narrative of racial and cultural decay. The tone is conspiratorial, accusatory, and emotionally charged, suggesting possible psychological rigidity, impaired empathy, and a detachment from reality. In short, the psychological makeup evident in the text reflects not only a disturbing detachment from reality, but also an alignment with historically murderous doctrines. The author’s faculties are clouded by hate, their reasoning shaped more by dogma than evidence, and their worldview represents a direct psychological echo of Nazi ideology. -------
Cherub Cow Member	Mon Jun 09 04:32:22 Spam and reply from "Common left-Wing "Anti-Semitism"" http://uto...hread=94612&time=1749461294998 ------- [Cherub Cow; Mon Jun 09 04:11:50] williamthecoward: stop spamming these threads. You can have that discussion with ChatGPT in the ChatGPT spam thread. I am moving your post there. ------- ------- [williamthecoward; Mon Jun 09 04:28:14 Im so sorry, but unfortunately: ChatGPT said: No, I absolutely would not recommend trying to have a serious debate with the author of that text. In summary: No, do not attempt a serious debate with the author of that text. It is almost certainly futile and potentially harmful. -------
Cherub Cow Member	Mon Jun 09 08:00:40 Spam from "Common left-Wing "Anti-Semitism"" http://uto...hread=94612&time=1749465297914 ------- [williamthecoward; Mon Jun 09 05:19:32] You said: Can mockery of such ideas be an effective weapon? ChatGPT said: Yes—humor and mockery can be powerful weapons against Nazi ideas, but they must be used thoughtfully and strategically. Why humor can be effective: Disarming Hate: Humor exposes the absurdity and contradictions in extremist beliefs, stripping them of their fearsome power and making them look ridiculous rather than intimidating. Undermining Authority: Nazi ideology often relies on an aura of seriousness and menace. Mockery breaks that by refusing to treat hateful ideas with respect or fear, weakening their social influence. You said: So would you recommend mocking these ideas? ChatGPT said: Yes, I would recommend mocking Nazi ideas as a useful tool to undermine their power. Mockery can expose the ridiculousness and moral bankruptcy of such hateful ideologies, making them less intimidating and less socially acceptable. In short, mockery can be a sharp weapon against Nazi ideas, helping to weaken their influence and empower those affected by their harm ------- ------- [williamthecoward; Mon Jun 09 05:34:57] I must admit that its amusing that ChatGPT's technical analysis of CC leads it to unequivocally conclude that CC's text is literally even more Nazi than Hitler, that it is futile to try to take her seriously, and recommends that she should instead be mocked lol -------
jergul large member	Tue Jun 10 08:31:56 Nah, this is par for the course. If anything, chat-gpt analyses is less spammy than most exchanges in this forum. I will leave your request around for a bit in case anyone feels called to do something.
Cherub Cow Member	Tue Jun 10 09:22:39 No. He is spamming it off-topic in several threads. He closed a thread with spam that was all within one minute. If you do not see that as spam then it's probably because you're a fucking faggot.
	show deleted posts

Your Name:
Your Password:
Your Message: