Utopia Talk / Politics / You idoits actually thought!!

Im better then you Member	Thu May 13 10:57:20 That two 10 year olds brutally raped an 8 year old girl!!! Goddamn you people are stupid. http://new...ews/england/london/8680370.stm Girl, eight, says 10-year-old boys 'did not rape her' An eight-year-old girl alleged to have been sexually assaulted by two 10-year-olds has told the Old Bailey that the boys did not rape her. She said she had lied to her mother about what happened because she had been "naughty" and was worried she would not get any sweets. The girl was allegedly attacked in a field in west London in October 2009. The boys, now aged 10 and 11, each deny two charges of rape and two charges of attempted rape of a child under 13. In cross-examination by defence counsel, the girl admitted that she had voluntarily been playing with the boys and had pulled her own underwear down while the boys exposed themselves to her. 'Secluded spot' Linda Strudwick, defending one of the boys, asked her: "Did you ever tell your mum it was not you but it was [the boys] who took your knickers down? You didn't want your mum to think you had been naughty?" The girl, giving evidence from behind a screen, replied: "Yeah." The judge, Mr Justice Saunders, asked what the girl had been worried about and she replied: "No sweets if it [sic] found out I had been naughty." The court has been told that the boys tried taking the girl to the third floor of a block of flats, then a nearby bin shed and into some bushes in order to find a "sufficiently secluded spot". They ended up at the field, where both boys carried out the assault, prosecutors say. None of the children involved in the trial can be named because of their age. When asked by the other boy's barrister, Chetna Patel, if she had played with him before, the girl replied that she had "sometimes". "My sister used to play with him and she kept wanting to kiss him, so my mum wanted me to watch over her," she told the court. Later, when she was asked whether the boy had pulled down her knickers, or carried out the sexual assault, she replied: "No." However, when Miss Patel asked whether the boy had picked her up at any time, the girl replied: "I can't remember." The trial continues.
Y2A Member	Thu May 13 11:00:24 they're cross examining an 8yr old wtf!
habebe Member	Thu May 13 11:00:32 habebe Member Wed May 12 12:39:52 Females make up rape stories ALL the time, almost more often than not. http://www...hread=34562&time=1273733136621 Pierre thought this, he (and I use that term loosely) is simpleton pussy.
habebe Member	Thu May 13 11:00:59 The mother probably put her up to this, lying cunt.
Paramount Member	Thu May 13 11:05:15 "Later, when she was asked whether the boy had pulled down her knickers, or carried out the sexual assault, she replied: "No."" She's probably too afraid to tell what they did, now that the police are asking questions and her mother is all upset and in a chock and all.
Alex Member	Thu May 13 12:20:11 THe mother should watch her fucking kids. How bout THAT shit?
Amadeus Member	Thu May 13 13:30:11 'i_do_its better then you' You for damn sure do.
The Guardian Member	Thu May 13 18:51:19 Women are all alike.
habebe Member	Thu May 13 19:01:04 "Bitches be scheming I kid you not, thats why I keep my windows locked and glock cocked"
The Guardian Member	Thu May 13 19:50:29 That's what I am doing wrong. I always keep my cock glocked.
habebe Member	Thu May 13 19:53:30 This is why it is important to listen to more biggie smalls.
Camaban Moderator	Thu May 13 19:55:23 >>they're cross examining an 8yr old wtf! << What's wrong with that?
Aeros Member	Thu May 13 19:57:15 She's the accuser. They have to cross examine her.
freaky boy Member	Fri May 14 00:44:07 yea, so buncha kids playing 'fuck-around-the-rosie" and the law decides to get involved. little jenny got her panties off, and little johny got a boner, she was sure impressed. the lawyers and cops who decided that this should end up in a court of law, are a bunch of fucking perverts, who shouldnt be allowed anywhere near kids. especialy kids who are dealing with their own sexual urges, and wrangling with their personal sense of identity.
freaky boy Member	Fri May 14 01:00:30 and while we're on the subject, Im even more pissed off that this is NEWS. for fuck sake, mainstream news is so full of this shit, like society as a whole should be outraged that ten year old kids are showing their hairless wieners and twats to each other??? this is NOT newsworthy. this is NOBODIES business but their own. about two years ago, an incident here in Brizvegas that got FRONT PAGE attention. "kids in a sex club" bunch of 8 year olds get caught in the toilets at school, wacking off, and sucking each other. THIS IS NOT NEWS - kids beating off is their OWN buisiness, and is NOT a fucking issue of concern for the general public. it goes to show firstly how perverse the media is, and or, how perverse their readers are that this should become a STORY!
Pierre Member	Mon May 24 20:07:24 They got a GUILTY verdict and are now sex offenders... in your face ibty and habebe..
habebe Member	Mon May 24 21:01:27 Wow, your glad they have a Fascist judge? Also not rape, they were found guilty of exposing themselves.From what I understand the girl did so as well and for some reason that is fine though. The girl is known liar.
Firestorm Phoenix Member	Mon May 24 21:03:03 So in summation, jury says they didn't commit the act but attempted, and the testimony is based on a witness with no credibility. This shit is so easy to appeal.
Pierre Member	Mon May 24 21:03:59 they were found guilty of attempted rape so they were not just being naked... and they have to register a sex offenders... so the judge and jury disagrees with you..
habebe Member	Mon May 24 21:08:36 Since the girl exposed herself why isn't she charged with attempted rape as well?
Pierre Member	Mon May 24 21:09:05 how can someone rape themself you silly boy...
habebe Member	Mon May 24 21:11:25 What? she exposed herself to two males, that sounds like two cases of attempted rape according to this judge.
Pierre Member	Mon May 24 21:12:28 yes she exposed herself by being raped... what a post really.. they forced her clothes off...
habebe Member	Mon May 24 21:14:01 That is a lie. " Later, when she was asked whether the boy had pulled down her knickers, or carried out the sexual assault, she replied: "No." " The little whore did so willingly apparently.
Pierre Member	Mon May 24 21:15:41 she was under huge pressure... they have medical evidence and stuff like that.. you cant invent that... "She had given a clear and compelling account to the police and her account was consistent with the medical evidence"
habebe Member	Mon May 24 21:17:08 " she was under huge pressure" Claims the girl who is a self admitted liar. " they have medical evidence and stuff like that" And what exactly is this medical evidence?
Pierre Member	Mon May 24 21:18:22 ask the judge and jury who found them guilty... unless you think there is a conspiracy theory and everyone is in on it..
habebe Member	Mon May 24 21:20:57 I never said that, if you claim that there is medical evidence that can not be "invented" then you should at least know what that is. I really can't even guess at what the medical evidence is that would some how PROVE an attempted** rape. What possible medical evidence would prove an ttempt at rape?
Pierre Member	Mon May 24 21:29:25 stuff like in a rape kit... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_kit * Routine blood collection is done (to check for pregnancy or sexually transmitted diseases). * The nurse documents any evidence of torn clothing or external injuries and takes photographs. * The victim's clothing is collected and new clothes are provided. * Any physical evidence from the rape scene (such as grass or leaves) is also collected. * Hairs are collected: the nurse collects any loose hairs or debris in the pelvic area (looking for pubic hairs of the assailant). In some cases, some of the victim's pubic hairs are needed and 15-20 of the victim's head hairs (to differentiate the victim's hairs from the assailant's). * Fingernail scrapings are collected for detection of blood or tissue. * The nurse then examines the victim's perineum, thighs, abdomen, buttocks and facial area for evidence of semen and, if detected, it is collected. * Several slides are made and swabs taken from the vaginal, anal, and oral areas to check for semen, sexually transmitted diseases, and infections. * The hospital provides the victim with any preventive medicine necessary (for tetanus, sexually transmitted diseases, pregnancy, etc.). * Medical personnel perform the pelvic exam. The victim may request to have the examination done by a person of the same gender. The sexual assault exam kit is then sealed in a box and secured at the hospital until given to the police for further laboratory analysis.
Camaban Moderator	Mon May 24 21:41:03 Which of those tests do you think applies to the current situation?
Im better then you Member	Thu May 27 12:24:45 ttt
	show deleted posts

Your Name:
Your Password:
Your Message: